Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 4 Issue 2, February 2009

Research into public perceptions of nanotechnology is becoming more rigorous with social scientists developing and testing increasingly complex theoretical models, as demonstrated by three papers in this issue. Dan Kahan and coworkers investigated the influence of cultural factors - in particular, whether individuals were pro- or anti-commerce - on attitudes towards the risks and benefits associated with nanotechnology; Dietram Scheufele and colleagues combined the results of public surveys in the US and Europe to explore the influence of religious beliefs on public perceptions of nanotechnology. In the third study Nick Pidgeon and co-workers found that energy applications of nanotechnology were viewed more positively than health applications in workshops organized in the UK and the US. (Image credit: Dariusz Miszkiel/123RF.)

Cover design by Karen Moore

Letters p87, 91 and 95; News & Views p79; Editorial p71

Editorial

  • As research into the public perception of nanotechnology becomes more complex and rigorous, it is increasingly clear that greater public awareness of nanotechnology will not, on its own, automatically lead to widespread public acceptance.

    Editorial

    Advertisement

Top of page ⤴

Correspondence

Top of page ⤴

Thesis

  • From solar power to supercapacitors, nanoscience and technology have the potential to help solve a number of pressing energy problems but, as Richard Jones reports, the credit crunch and wild swings in the price of oil could get in the way of these solutions.

    • Richard Jones
    Thesis
Top of page ⤴

Research Highlights

Top of page ⤴

News & Views

  • Research into public perceptions of nanotechnology is becoming more rigorous as increasingly complex theoretical models are developed and tested by social scientists.

    • Steven C. Currall
    News & Views
  • Theorists have shown that the forces between atoms in an atomic-scale contact can do work when an electronic current is passed through it, opening up the possibility that current could be used to drive atomic-scale motors.

    • Mads Brandbyge
    News & Views
  • New insights are emerging about the interactions between brain cells and carbon nanotubes, which could eventually lead to the development of nanoengineered neural devices.

    • Gabriel A. Silva
    News & Views
  • Charged nanoparticles can alter the local physical properties of lipid membranes, which could shed new light on the interactions between living cells and nanomaterials.

    • Kenneth A. Dawson
    • Anna Salvati
    • Iseult Lynch
    News & Views
  • By measuring changes in the photoluminescence of single-walled carbon nanotubes caused by the presence of molecules that damage DNA, it could be possible to build a biosensor that can identify multiple analytes in real time.

    • Todd D. Krauss
    News & Views
Top of page ⤴

Letter

  • A sample of 1,862 adults was presented with balanced information on the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Subjects did not react in a uniform manner, but polarized along lines consistent with cultural predispositions towards technological risk generally.

    • Dan M. Kahan
    • Donald Braman
    • Geoffrey Cohen
    Letter
  • Research suggests that citizens use 'religious filters' as an important cognitive shortcut for many scientific issues, including nanotechnology. Combining the results of surveys in the United States and Europe, it has been found that US respondents were significantly less likely to agree that nanotechnology is morally acceptable than respondents in many European countries. These moral views correlated directly with aggregate levels of religiosity in each country.

    • Dietram A. Scheufele
    • Elizabeth A. Corley
    • Shirley S. Ho
    Letter
  • Public surveys provide valuable information on how people view nanotechnology, but cannot easily uncover more detailed responses to the complexities of any new technology. Four concurrent workshops debating energy and health nanotechnologies in the US and UK found that energy applications were viewed more positively than those for health in both countries.

    • Nick Pidgeon
    • Barbara Herr Harthorn
    • Tee Rogers-Hayden
    Letter
  • Current-induced forces in atomic wires are shown to be non-conservative, which means that they are able to do net work and to drive atomic-scale motors. Numerical simulations are presented of a motor that turns like a waterwheel when current runs through it

    • Daniel Dundas
    • Eunan J. McEniry
    • Tchavdar N. Todorov
    Letter
  • Electronic devices based on semiconductor nanowires will rely on the location and number of dopant atoms in the host semiconductor being controlled during the fabrication process. It has now been shown that the properties of dopant atoms — in particular, their ionization energies — change with nanowire radius more markedly than previously predicted.

    • Mikael T. Björk
    • Heinz Schmid
    • Walter Riess
    Letter
  • The photoluminescence properties of carbon nanotubes are sensitive to molecular adsorption. By studying the response of a pair of single-wall carbon nanotubes, researchers have now shown that analytes of biological interest can be identified and measured in real-time within living cells.

    • Daniel A. Heller
    • Hong Jin
    • Michael S. Strano
    Letter
  • Colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals are widely used in biological imaging, but existing synthesis techniques are difficult and require specialized expertise. Here it is shown that the use of DNA as a ligand allows a simpler synthetic protocol to be used, producing biofunctionalized nanocrystals that exhibit strong optical emission in the visible spectrum, minimal toxicity and small hydrodynamic diameter.

    • Nan Ma
    • Edward H. Sargent
    • Shana O. Kelley
    Letter
Top of page ⤴

Article

Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links