Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

In vivo immunogold labeling confirms large-scale chromatin folding motifs

Abstract

The difficulty in localizing specific cellular proteins by immuno-electron microscopy techniques limits applications of electron microscopy to cell biology. We found that in vivo immunogold labeling improves epitope accessibility, ultrastructural preservation and three-dimensional visualization, and allows correlated light and electron microscopy. We detected large-scale chromatin folding motifs within intact interphase nuclei of CHO cells and visualized the ultrastructure of DNA replication 'factories' labeled with GFP–proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Demonstration of in vivo immunogold labeling using A03 cells.
Figure 2: In vivo conformation of large-scale chromatin fibers.
Figure 3: In vivo labeling of DNA replication foci reveals GFP-PCNA within condensed, large-scale chromatin domains.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gaietta, G. et al. Science 296, 503–507 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grabenbauer, M. et al. Nat. Methods 2, 857–862 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, G., Sudlow, G. & Belmont, A.S. J. Cell Biol. 140, 975–989 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hainfeld, J.F. & Furuya, F.R. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40, 177–184 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Biggiogera, M. et al. Biol. Cell 87, 121–132 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Testillano, P.S. et al. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39, 1427–1438 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Derenzini, M., Farabegoli, F. & Trere, D. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 41, 829–836 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Belmont, A.S., Braunfeld, M.B., Sedat, J.W. & Agard, D.A. Chromosoma 98, 129–143 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinett, C.C. et al. J. Cell Biol. 135, 1685–1700 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kireeva, N., Lakonishok, M., Kireev, I., Hirano, T. & Belmont, A.S. J. Cell Biol. 166, 775–785 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leonhardt, H. et al. J. Cell Biol. 149, 271–280 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, H. et al. J. Cell Biol. 143, 1415–1425 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Keefe, R.T., Henderson, S.C. & Spector, D.L. J. Cell Biol. 116, 1095–1110 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaunin, F., Visser, A.E., Cmarko, D., Aten, J.A. & Fakan, S. Exp. Cell Res. 260, 313–323 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hozak, P., Hassan, A.B., Jackson, D.A. & Cook, P.R. Cell 73, 361–373 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences. (grant GM42516 to A.S.B.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.K. performed in vivo labeling and electron microscopy analysis; M.L. developed the monoclonal antibodies, purified these antibodies and prepared Fab′ fragments, and carried out initial in vivo labeling feasibility experiments; R.P., W.L. and V.N.J. optimized and conducted the Nanogold antibody labeling, in conjunction with M.L.; A.S.B. supervised the overall project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew S Belmont.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

W.L., V.N.J. and R.P. are employees of Nanoprobes, Inc.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary Methods (PDF 1764 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Tilted projections showing gene amplified region from PDC cell labeled in vivo with anti-GFP Nanogold antibodies. Large-scale chromatin fibers of 120-170 nm diameter can be visualized corresponding to the GFP-lac repressor staining of the lac operator containing, amplified transgene array. Projection step size 5 degrees. Scale bar, 500 nm. (MOV 1820 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

Rocking projections of a mid-S phase, DNA replication focus, as identified by GFP-PCNA labeled in vivo with anti-GFP Nanogold antibodies. Note the appearance of a uniform distribution of label through the replication focus. Projection step size 5 degrees. Cell was permeabilized prior to fixation to reveal surrounding chromatin (darkly stained material). (MOV 1281 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kireev, I., Lakonishok, M., Liu, W. et al. In vivo immunogold labeling confirms large-scale chromatin folding motifs. Nat Methods 5, 311–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1196

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1196

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing