Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Methagora
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
naturejobs
For Advertisers
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
Application notes
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Protocols
Nature Genetics
Nature Chemical Biology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Neuroscience
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Correspondence
Nature Methods - 4, 379 (2007)
doi:10.1038/nmeth0507-379a

Suitability of hCMV for viral gene expression in the brain

Sergey Kasparov

University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK. sergey.kasparov@bristol.ac.uk

To the editor:

Viral gene delivery is a powerful tool that is rapidly gaining popularity in experimental neuroscience. I believe that the near future will see rapid expansion of this remarkably versatile and adaptable method. Recent communication by Wickersham et al.1 describes yet another interesting implementation of this technology for retrograde tracing of neurons from their target areas. The key point of the paper is demonstration of a high level of enhanced GFP (EGFP) expression using a rabies virus mutant with glycoprotein gene substituted by EGFP. After injecting the vector into the thalamus, the authors showed many bright EGFP-expressing cortical pyramidal neurons. As a reference, they used a lentivirus with rabies virus envelope glycoprotein in which EGFP expression was driven by human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) promoter and found a very low level of EGFP expression with it.

I would like to draw the attention of Nature Methods' readers to the issue of suitability of hCMV-driven constructs for targeting brain neurons. According to the experience of our laboratory, hCMV expression in brain is only stable in some neuronal phenotypes, for example, cholinergic neurons such as those found in the nucleus of the hypoglossal nerve or vagal motor neurons. Other neurons, for example, in the adjacent nucleus of the solitary tract (which are glutamate, GABA and noradrenergic neurons) yield extremely poor expression with hCMV-containing adeno- and lentiviruses2. Hence, the assumption that hCMV-driven viral constructs are guaranteed to express in all neurons is incorrect. Such constructs are, however, very active in glia, sometimes creating a confusing impression of high level of expression (see Supplementary Fig. 1 online). A striking example of a lack of hCMV activity in medullary neurons was recently given3. Therefore, for the comparison to be fair, it is critical that stable and high-level EGFP expression in pyramidal neurons be demonstrated using the same lentivirus (presumably this would require using viruses coated with vesicular stomatitis glycoprotein rather than rabies virus glycoprotein). Incidentally, we also had demonstrated bright unstained EGFP-expressing noradrenergic neurons targeted using conventional adenoviral vectors injected into spinal cord2. Such cells are easily identifiable in acute slices prepared from pretransfected animals and can be studied using patch clamp. Curiously, it seems that the phenotype of neurons affects their suitability for retrograde transduction, as we never succeeded in achieving the same with glutamatergic neurons, such as cortical pyramidals, which were the target in the study by Wickersham et al.1. Finally, it is likely that the expression profile of hCMV-containing vectors based on adeno-associated virus may obey different rules owing to the effects of the viral inverted terminal repeats4.

Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Methods website.

Please visit methagora to view and post comments on this article

 Top
REFERENCES
  1. Wickersham, I.R., Finke, S., Conzelmann, K.K. & Callaway, E.M. Nat. Methods 4, 47–49 (2007). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  2. Lonergan, T., Teschemacher, A.G., Hwang, D.-Y., Kim, K.-S. & Kasparov, S. Physiol. Genom. 20, 165–172 (2005). | ChemPort |
  3. Allen, A.M. et al. Hypertension 47, 1054–1061 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Wang, C.Y. & Wang, S. Gene Ther. 13, 1447–1456 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
 Top

Competing interests statement:  The author declares no competing financial interests.

FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 1 article citing this articleCrossRef lists 1 article citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
More articles like this
References
Supplementary info
Export citation
Export references

Open Innovation Challenges

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Nature Methods
ISSN: 1548-7091
EISSN: 1548-7105
Journal home | Current issue | Archive | Press releases |
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2007 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy