Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Methagora
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
naturejobs
For Advertisers
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
Application notes
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Protocols
Nature Genetics
Nature Chemical Biology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Neuroscience
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Research Highlights
Nature Methods - 4, 10 (2007)
doi:10.1038/nmeth0107-10

Gene transfer

A prince for Sleeping Beauty

Nicole Rusk

A new transposon vector can deliver large DNA cargos to vertebrate cells, making it a useful tool for genetic applications.

It sounds like a modern fairy tale: Sleeping Beauty finds a companion—not one to kiss her awake, but one who perfectly complements her. Stephen Ekker from the University of Minnesota had a significant role in finding just such a companion for the transposon system Sleeping Beauty (SB). Transposons, mobile DNA elements flanked on either side by inverted repeats, are excised by a transposase at these terminal repeat sequences and inserted again almost at random elsewhere in the genome. SB was the first transposon vector developed with the ability to deliver cargo to any vertebrate cell, but it had its limitations. Ekker had been looking to find another transposon to expand the toolkit and to complement SB's shortcomings.

His team used the Tol2 transposon from the medaka fish as a basis for constructing a vector composed of the minimum sequences required for transposition and tested it in vitro and in vivo (Balciunas et al., 2006). One big advantage over SB became apparent right away: whereas SB is most effective in mobilizing DNA stretches of up to 2 kb, Tol2 does not lose efficacy with loads of 10 kb. A possible explanation for this difference in cargo capacity lies in the biochemistry of the transposases; whereas SB requires a tetramer to mobilize its DNA, Tol2 likely only needs a dimer.

At present, the Ekker team delivers the transposase via a second plasmid, but they are developing several other options. One is to administer RNA or protein to the cells, and another to use a cis vector with the transposase and the terminal repeats on the same plasmid. Ekker expects the design of such cis vectors for Tol2 to be easier than it was for SB because, unlike SB, Tol2 is not hampered by overexpression inhibition. When SB's transposase is expressed at too-high levels, DNA mobilization is inhibited, forcing scientists to hunt for a promoter that drives transposase expression at just the right levels. This difficulty limited vector design to researchers whom Ekker refers to as "transposon connoisseurs". Not so with Tol2; as Ekker predicts: "When you are making a cis vector with Tol2, you can say 'I am just going to take the most powerful promoter I know in the tissue I want to target' and park it upstream [of the terminal repeats] and you know it is going to work."

Ekker is convinced that the ease of design will disseminate the use of transposon vectors to a larger audience. The fact that transposons integrate at random makes them ideally suited for applications such as gene trapping and other genome-wide studies.

Ekker also sees a rosy future for Tol2 in gene therapy, as it can deliver larger DNA inserts than viral vectors that cap their cargo at 8 kb. As far as safety concerns with a transposon vector go, Ekker sees random integration as an advantage over viruses that clearly prefer transcriptional units. But he also says, "We don't really know what the safety concerns are going to be from a truly random vector. We know from our mouse studies that it is not an oncogenic scenario, unless you make the cargo oncogenic."

To test the Tol2 transposon in vivo, Ekker's team chose a mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1—a disease caused by the deficiency of an enzyme that hydrolyzes fumarylacetoacetate, the accumulation of which is toxic for hepatocytes. The researchers injected the mice with the Tol2 transposon encoding the enzyme and another plasmid carrying the Tol2 transposase and showed that this protocol corrected the metabolic deficiency in the animals.

In gene therapy, as in other genetic applications, SB and Tol2 can show their combined strength: they can deliver any two genes, each only activated by its own transposase, or one can carry a gene and the other the transposase under a tissue-specific promoter, giving researchers a precise targeting tool.

It looks like SB and Tol2 have a lot of work ahead of them—and a good shot at living happily ever after.

 Top
REFERENCES
  1. Balciunas, D. et al. Harnessing a high cargo-capacity transposon for genetic applications in vertebrates. PLoS Genetics 2, e169 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
 Top
FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
Save this linkSave this link
More articles like this
References
Export citation
Export references

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

ADVERTISEMENT

 
Nature Methods
ISSN: 1548-7091
EISSN: 1548-7105
Journal home | Current issue | Archive | Press releases |
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2007 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy