Letter abstract


Nature Materials 6, 418 - 423 (2007)
Published online: 21 May 2007 | doi:10.1038/nmat1913

Subject Categories: Nanoscale materials | Porous materials

Modulus–density scaling behaviour and framework architecture of nanoporous self-assembled silicas

Hongyou Fan1,2, Christopher Hartshorn2, Thomas Buchheit1, David Tallant1, Roger Assink1, Regina Simpson1, Dave J. Kissel2, Daniel J. Lacks3, Salvatore Torquato4 & C. Jeffrey Brinker1,2

Top

Natural porous materials such as bone, wood and pith evolved to maximize modulus for a given density1. For these three-dimensional cellular solids, modulus scales quadratically with relative density2, 3. But can nanostructuring improve on Nature's designs? Here, we report modulus–density scaling relationships for cubic (C), hexagonal (H) and worm-like disordered (D) nanoporous silicas prepared by surfactant-directed self-assembly. Over the relative density range, 0.5 to 0.65, Young's modulus scales as (density)n where n(C)<n(H)<n(D)<2, indicating that nanostructured porous silicas exhibit a structure-specific hierarchy of modulus values D<H<C. Scaling exponents less than 2 emphasize that the moduli are less sensitive to porosity than those of natural cellular solids, which possess extremal moduli based on linear elasticity theory4. Using molecular modelling and Raman and NMR spectroscopy, we show that uniform nanoscale confinement causes the silica framework of self-assembled silica to contain a higher portion of small, stiff rings than found in other forms of amorphous silica. The nanostructure-specific hierarchy and systematic increase in framework modulus we observe, when decreasing the silica framework thickness below 2 nm, provides a new ability to maximize mechanical properties at a given density needed for nanoporous materials integration5.

Top
  1. Sandia National Laboratories, Advanced Materials Laboratory, 1001 University Blvd SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA
  2. The University of New Mexico/NSF Center for Micro-Engineered Materials and Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA
  3. Case Western Reserve University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA
  4. Princeton University, Department of Chemistry and Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

Correspondence to: C. Jeffrey Brinker1,2 e-mail: cjbrink@sandia.gov

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Materials science Organosilica the conciliator

Nature News and Views (10 Aug 2006)

Materials science Germanium takes holey orders

Nature News and Views (29 Jun 2006)


Extra navigation

Subscribe to Nature Materials

Subscribe

naturejobs

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT