Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

To be nano or not to be nano?

Abstract

Nanomaterials, nanostructures, nanostructured materials, nanoimprint, nanobiotechnology, nanophysics, nanochemistry, radical nanotechnology, nanosciences, nanooptics, nanoelectronics, nanorobotics, nanosoldiers, nanomedecine, nanoeconomy, nanobusiness, nanolawyer, nanoethics to name a few of the nanos. We need a clear definition of all these burgeoning fields for the sake of the grant attribution, for the sake of research program definition, and to avoid everyone being lost in so many nanos.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Artificial 'device' at the nanoscale: the scanning tunnelling microscope image of a single Lander molecule, which is creating a circular electronic wave modulation, 0.008 nm in amplitude, on the Cu(111) surface. Reprinted with permission from ref. 12.
Figure 2: Artificial and natural 'devices' at the mesoscale.
Figure 3: Galatée aux Sphères (Salvador Dali, 1952).

References

  1. Nanoscience, and Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Uncertainties Document 19/04 (The Royal Society, London, 2004); http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm

  2. Nanoscience, Nanotechnologies RST no. 18 (Académie des Sciences & Académie des Technologies, Lavoisier, Paris, 2004); http://www.academie-sciences.fr/publications/rapports/rapports_html/RST18.htm

  3. Eigler, D. & Schweizer, R. Nature 344, 524–527 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melmed, A. J. & Müller, E. W. J. Chem. Phys. 29, 1037–1041 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Möllenstedt, G. & Speidel, R. Phys. Blätter 16, 192–198 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lohmann, H. Wiss. Meeresunters Kiel 10, 129–370 (1908).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kajander O. & Ciftcioglu, N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8274–8279 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Procès-verbaux des Séances Vol. XXV, 119 (Comité International des Poids et Mesure, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1957)

  9. Aviram, A. & Ratner, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 29, 277–283 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Taniguchi, N. Proc. Int. Congress Prod. Eng. Part 2, 18 (JSPE, Tokyo, 1974).

  11. de Broglie, L. Recherche d'un Demi-siecle 14 (Albin-Michel, Paris, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moresco, F. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 036601 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Riebesell, U. et al. Nature 407, 364–367 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cleland, A. N. & Roukes, M. L. Nature 392, 160–162 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to V. Ondarçuhu, P. Hawkes and X. Bouju for their critical reading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joachim, C. To be nano or not to be nano?. Nature Mater 4, 107–109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1319

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1319

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing