Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Neutralization of staphylococcal enterotoxin B by soluble, high-affinity receptor antagonists

Abstract

Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus belong to a family of bacterial proteins that act as superantigens by activating a large subset of the T-cell population, causing massive release of inflammatory cytokines. This cascade can ultimately result in toxic shock syndrome and death. Therapeutics targeting the early stage of the pathogenic process, when the superantigen binds to its receptor, could limit the severity of disease. We engineered picomolar binding affinity agents to neutralize the potent toxin staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB). A single immunoglobulin-like domain of the T-cell receptor (variable region, Vβ) was subjected to multiple rounds of directed evolution using yeast display. Soluble forms of the engineered Vβ proteins produced in Escherichia coli were effective inhibitors of SEB-mediated T-cell activation and completely neutralized the lethal activity of SEB in animal models. These Vβ proteins represent an easily produced potential treatment for diseases mediated by bacterial superantigens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Vβ8 mutants engineered for high-affinity SEB binding.
Figure 2: In vitro inhibitory activity of soluble, high-affinity Vβ mutants.
Figure 3: Soluble Vβ blocks the activity and lethality of SEB in rabbits.
Figure 4: Soluble Vβ rescues rabbits exposed to SEB in the endotoxin enhancement and osmotic pump models.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. McCormick, J.K., Yarwood, J.M. & Schlievert, P.M. Toxic shock syndrome and bacterial superantigens: an update. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 77–104 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marrack, P. & Kappler, J. The staphylococcal entertoxins and their relatives. Science 248, 705–711 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett, J.C., Henchal, E.A., Schmaljohn, A.L. & Bavari, S. The evolving field of biodefence: therapeutic developments and diagnostics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 281–297 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Crass, B.A. & Bergdoll, M.S. Involvement of staphylococcal enterotoxins in nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23, 1138–1139 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, V.T., Chang, A.H. & Chow, A.W. Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B among toxic shock syndrome (TSS)- and non-TSS-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 166, 911–915 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews, M.M., Parent, E.M., Barry, M. & Parsonnet, J. Recurrent nonmenstrual toxic shock syndrome: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32, 1470–1479 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, H., Llera, A., Malchiodi, E.L. & Mariuzza, R.A. The structural basis of T cell activation by superantigens. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17, 435–466 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kieke, M.C. et al. High affinity T cell receptors from yeast display libraries block T cell activation by superantigens. J. Mol. Biol. 307, 1305–1315 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buonpane, R.A., Moza, B., Sundberg, E.J. & Kranz, D.M. Characterization of T cell receptors engineered for high affinity against toxic shock syndrome toxin-1. J. Mol. Biol. 353, 308–321 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boder, E.T. & Wittrup, K.D. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 553–557 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maynard, J.A. et al. Protection against anthrax toxin by recombinant antibody fragments correlates with antigen affinity. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 597–601 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Razai, A. et al. Molecular evolution of antibody affinity for sensitive detection of botulinum neurotoxin type A. J. Mol. Biol. 351, 158–169 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scobie, H.M. et al. A soluble receptor decoy protects rats against anthrax lethal toxin challenge. J. Infect. Dis. 192, 1047–1051 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone, R.L. & Schlievert, P.M. Evidence for the involvement of endotoxin in toxic shock syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 155, 682–689 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Horn, D.L. et al. What are the microbial components implicated in the pathogenesis of sepsis? Report on a symposium. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31, 851–858 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schlievert, P.M. Enhancement of host susceptibility to lethal endotoxin shock by staphylococcal pyrogenic exotoxin type C. Infect. Immun. 36, 123–128 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Holt, L.J., Herring, C., Jespers, L.S., Woolven, B.P. & Tomlinson, I.M. Domain antibodies: proteins for therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 484–490 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Olafsen, T. et al. Optimizing radiolabeled engineered anti-p185HER2 antibody fragments for in vivo imaging. Cancer Res. 65, 5907–5916 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, A.M. & Senter, P.D. Arming antibodies: prospects and challenges for immunoconjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1137–1146 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoogenboom, H.R. Selecting and screening recombinant antibody libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1105–1116 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Holliger, P. & Hudson, P.J. Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1126–1136 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaneko, Y., Nimmerjahn, F. & Ravetch, J.V. Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from Fc sialylation. Science 313, 670–673 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Soo Hoo, W. & Kranz, D.M. Role of CD8 in staphylococcal enterotoxin B-mediated lysis by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 150, 4331–4337 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reed, L.J. & Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 27, 493–497 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parsonnet, J., Gillis, Z.A., Richter, A.G. & Pier, G.B. A rabbit model of toxic shock syndrome that uses a constant, subcutaneous infusion of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1. Infect. Immun. 55, 1070–1076 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Roggiani, M., Stoehr, J.A., Leonard, B.A. & Schlievert, P.M. Analysis of toxicity of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A mutants. Infect. Immun. 65, 2868–2875 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Levitt for advice on the pharmacokinetic studies, R. Mariuzza for discussions regarding SAgs and S. Bavari for discussions regarding animal models of toxic shock syndrome. These studies were supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grant AI064611 to D.M.K.). B.M. is a recipient of the Boston Biomedical Research Institute Scholar Award. R.A.B. was partially supported by a US National Institutes of Health training grant (T32 GM 07283).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.A.B. engineered the final generation of Vβ clones, expressed the Vβ proteins in E. coli, conducted the in vitro neutralization experiments, and helped to draft the manuscript. H.R.O.C. engineered the initial generations of Vβ clones and conducted yeast display experiments. B.M. and E.J.S. conducted the surface plasmon resonance experiments and drafted some sections of the manuscript. M.L.P. conducted the pharmacokinetic studies and evaluated the data. P.M.S. conducted the rabbit experiments, evaluated the data and drafted some sections of the manuscript. D.M.K. helped to design the experiments by R.A.B. and H.R.O.C., evaluated data and drafted the manuscript. All authors provided comments on the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M Kranz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Analysis of Vβ8 mutants for SEB binding at different stages of affinity maturation. (PDF 103 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Equilibrium SEB binding titration of clones at different stages of affinity maturation. (PDF 139 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Surface plasmon resonance analysis of affinity matured Vβ8.2 clones. (PDF 164 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 4

Serum clearance of 125I-Vβ in the presence or absence of SEB. (PDF 54 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Yeast display library sizes. (PDF 59 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

SEB binding and in vitro inhibitory properties of Vβ8 affinity matured variants. (PDF 96 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Biodistribution of 125I-labeled Vβ in rabbits three hours after injection. (PDF 57 kb)

Supplementary Note (PDF 336 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buonpane, R., Churchill, H., Moza, B. et al. Neutralization of staphylococcal enterotoxin B by soluble, high-affinity receptor antagonists. Nat Med 13, 725–729 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1584

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1584

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing