Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Free Association (blog)
Supplements
Focuses
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
Reprints and permissions
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Biotechnology
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Medicine
Nature Methods
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
news@nature.com
Nature Conferences
RNAi Gateway
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Letter
Nature Genetics  37, 429 - 434 (2005)
Published online: 18 February 2005; | doi:10.1038/ng1529

Fine-scale recombination patterns differ between chimpanzees and humans

Susan E Ptak1, David A Hinds2, Kathrin Koehler1, Birgit Nickel1, Nila Patil2, Dennis G Ballinger2, Molly Przeworski3, 4, Kelly A Frazer2, 4 & Svante Pääbo1, 4

1  Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

2  Perlegen Sciences, Inc., 2021 Stierlin Court, Mountain View, California 94043, USA.

3  Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, 80 Waterman Street, Box G-W, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.

4  These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence should be addressed to Susan E Ptak ptak@email.eva.mpg.de
Recombination rates seem to vary extensively along the human genome. Pedigree analysis suggests that rates vary by an order of magnitude when measured at the megabase scale1, and at a finer scale, sperm typing studies point to the existence of recombination hotspots2. These are short regions (1−2 kb) in which recombination rates are 10−1,000 times higher than the background rate. Less is known about how recombination rates change over time. Here we determined to what degree recombination rates are conserved among closely related species by estimating recombination rates from 14 Mb of linkage disequilibrium data in central chimpanzee and human populations. The results suggest that recombination hotspots are not conserved between the two species and that recombination rates in larger (50 kb) genomic regions are only weakly conserved. Therefore, the recombination landscape has changed markedly between the two species.


MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Hot spots unglued

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Jun 2005)

New insights into the biological basis of genomic disorders

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Dec 2006)

See all 3 matches for News And Views
 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
Export citation
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Genetics
ISSN: 1061-4036
EISSN: 1546-1718
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2005 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy