News home
 Archive
Specials
Opinion
Features
News blog
Events blog
Nature Journal
 
specials

OSCARS 2006

While Hollywood celebrates the best in movie making from 2005, Nature news has decided to delve into the world of science and cinema. Find out about this year's technical awards, read our reviews of some films, and join the discussion about what movies people ought to be making.

NEWS
DISCUSS
REVIEWS
ARCHIVE

NEWS
Movie technologies get red-carpet treatment
Stunt crash pads and high-tech cameras steal the show.
3 March 2006
Grizzlies, dodos and Gore put science on film
Ex-vice-president taps into trend towards movies with a message.
22 February 2006
DISCUSS
It oughta be a film
Tell us which science stories make you want to see the movie.
3 March 2006
REVIEWS

Nature's staff take a quick look at the science (and the fiction) behind some of the films we saw in 2005.

The Constant Gardener

Grizzly Man

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

The Island

King Kong

 

Proof

Wallace & Gromit

War of the Worlds

What the Bleep Do We Know!?

 
What the Bleep Do We Know!?

Plot summary: Ok, I know this film was released in the United States in 2004, but it so raised hackles when it debuted in the United Kingdom in 2005 we thought it deserved a mention. Half documentary and half drama, the film features a deaf photographer who discovers that 'quantum physics' can (miraculously) liberate her from anxiety attacks and low self-esteem, interspersed with interviews from scientists and "mystics".

Science review: Quantum physics does highlight a bunch of odd stuff, mysterious things do happen at the quantum level, and yes, it probably is the weirdest part of science. But What the Bleep makes some leaps of faith that we think squarely put it in the bonkers category. In reality, quantum effects are extremely small at large scales and the macro world is almost perfectly described by classical physics.

There have been some worthy conjectures about the link between quantum effects and macro systems. Take the 'Orchestrated Objective Reduction', or Orch OR, theory proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff (who features in the film) that consciousness involes a specific form of quantum computation.

But we give no award for worthy conjectures for this film: quantum mumbo jumbo will not defeat modern medicine. And the intricate mesh of science and pseudo-science that the film foists on its unsuspecting audience is a 'bleep' to unravel.

Award: Biggest quantum leap in the application of quantum physics.

Image: © Revolver Entertainment

Back to Reviews
ARCHIVE

Science in culture: A bigger picture of apes

Blog: Flock of Dodos

Evolution debates hit the big screen

Book review: The Science of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Science in the movies: Hollywood or bust

Science at the movies: The fabulous fish guy

muse@nature.com: Monster or machine?

Disaster movie makes waves

Disaster movie highlights transatlantic divide

Film review: The Day After Tomorrow

Real experiment stars in Hulk movie

Superheroes make physics fun

ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works © 2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy