Access
This article is part of Nature's premium content.
Published online 24 September 2008 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2008.1127
News
Competition for sex hampers endangered species' recovery
Study challenges conservation management methods.
The battles for reproductive supremacy between individuals of an endangered species can significantly hamper the population's recovery rate, according to a study that measured the effects of this competition on conservation. The research suggests that some aspects of conservation practice, such as supplementary feeding of threatened species, should be re-evaluated to take account of this effect.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Comments
Reader comments are usually moderated after posting. If you find something offensive or inappropriate, you can speed this process by clicking 'Report this comment' (or, if that doesn't work for you, email webadmin@nature.com). For more controversial topics, we reserve the right to moderate before comments are published.
I'm amused that Andrés is reported as being the leader of the team - in reality he was the student who had to do the work (including the fieldwork, poor soul) and Hanna Kokko was the leader. And Riverside wasn't involved, except to offer Andrés a job afterwards - he did the work at the University of Helsinki, and (for confusing historical reasons) was awarded his PhD by the University of Jyväskylä. Bob O'Hara (University of Helsinki)
The work confirms selection is differential reproduction and that (aggessive) individuals keen to reproducing are bad for the population as a whole. Where is Darwin?