Abstract
How does the primate visual system encode three-dimensional motion? The macaque middle temporal area (MT) and the human MT complex (MT+) have well-established sensitivity to two-dimensional frontoparallel motion and static disparity. However, evidence for sensitivity to three-dimensional motion has remained elusive. We found that human MT+ encodes two binocular cues to three-dimensional motion: changing disparities over time and interocular comparisons of retinal velocities. By varying important properties of moving dot displays, we distinguished these three-dimensional motion signals from their constituents, instantaneous binocular disparity and monocular retinal motion. An adaptation experiment confirmed direction selectivity for three-dimensional motion. Our results indicate that MT+ carries critical binocular signals for three-dimensional motion processing, revealing an important and previously overlooked role for this well-studied brain area.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Born, R.T. & Bradley, D.C. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 157–189 (2005).
Cumming, B.G. & DeAngelis, G.C. The physiology of stereopsis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 203–238 (2001).
DeAngelis, G.C. & Newsome, W.T. Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT. J. Neurosci. 19, 1398–1415 (1999).
Huk, A.C., Dougherty, R.F. & Heeger, D.J. Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST. J. Neurosci. 22, 7195–7205 (2002).
Maunsell, J.H. & Van Essen, D.C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 1148–1167 (1983).
Albright, T.D. Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol. 52, 1106–1130 (1984).
DeAngelis, G.C. & Newsome, W.T. Perceptual “read-out” of conjoined direction and disparity maps in extrastriate area MT. PLoS Biol. 2, e77 (2004).
Nguyenkim, J.D. & DeAngelis, G.C. Disparity-based coding of three-dimensional surface orientation by macaque middle temporal neurons. J. Neurosci. 23, 7117–7128 (2003).
Smith, A.T. & Wall, M.B. Sensitivity of human visual cortical areas to the stereoscopic depth of a moving stimulus. J. Vis. 8, 1–12 (2008).
Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1971).
Cumming, B.G. & Parker, A.J. Binocular mechanisms for detecting motion-in-depth. Vision Res. 34, 483–495 (1994).
Brooks, K.R. Interocular velocity difference contributes to stereomotion speed perception. J. Vis. 2, 218–231 (2002).
Harris, J.M. & Rushton, S.K. Poor visibility of motion in depth is due to early motion averaging. Vision Res. 43, 385–392 (2003).
Rokers, B., Cormack, L.K. & Huk, A.C. Strong percepts of motion through depth without strong percepts of position in depth. J. Vis. 8, 1–10 (2008).
Fernandez, J.M. & Farell, B. Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect. Vision Res. 46, 1307–1317 (2006).
Beverley, K.I. & Regan, D. Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensitive to the direction of movement in space. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 235, 17–29 (1973).
Shioiri, S., Saisho, H., & Yaguchi, H. Motion in depth based on inter-ocular velocity differences. Vision Res. 40, 2565–2572 (2000).
Heeger, D.J., Boynton, G.M., Demb, J.B., Seidemann, E. & Newsome, W.T. Motion opponency in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 19, 7162–7174 (1999).
Qian, N., Andersen, R.A. & Adelson, E.H. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics. J. Neurosci. 14, 7357–7366 (1994).
Likova, L.T. & Tyler, C.W. Stereomotion processing in the human occipital cortex. Neuroimage 38, 293–305 (2007).
Norcia, A.M. & Tyler, C.W. Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes. Vision Res. 24, 395–401 (1984).
Cumming, B.G. & Parker, A.J. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature 389, 280–283 (1997).
Bridge, H. & Parker, A.J. Topographical representation of binocular depth in the human visual cortex using fMRI. J Vis 7, 1–14 (2007).
Bradley, D.C., Qian, N. & Andersen, R.A. Integration of motion and stereopsis in middle temporal cortical area of macaques. Nature 373, 609–611 (1995).
Dodd, J.V., Krug, K., Cumming, B.G. & Parker, A.J. Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT. J. Neurosci. 21, 4809–4821 (2001).
Akase, E., Inokawa, H. & Toyama, K. Neuronal responsiveness to three-dimensional motion in cat posteromedial lateral suprasylvian cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 122, 214–226 (1998).
Toyama, K., Komatsu, Y., Kasai, H., Fujii, K. & Umetani, K. Responsiveness of Clare-Bishop neurons to visual cues associated with motion of a visual stimulus in three-dimensional space. Vision Res. 25, 407–414 (1985).
Cynader, M. & Regan, D. Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: effect of positional disparity. Vision Res. 22, 967–982 (1982).
Zeki, S.M. Cells responding to changing image size and disparity in the cortex of the rhesus monkey. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 242, 827–841 (1974).
Poggio, G.F. & Talbot, W.H. Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 315, 469–492 (1981).
Regan, D. & Cynader, M. Neurons in cat visual cortex tuned to the direction of motion in depth: effect of stimulus speed. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 22, 535–550 (1982).
Nadler, J.W., Angelaki, D.E. & DeAngelis, G.C. A neural representation of depth from motion parallax in macaque visual cortex. Nature 452, 642–645 (2008).
Orban, G.A., Sunaert, S., Todd, J.T., Van Hecke, P. & Marchal, G. Human cortical regions involved in extracting depth from motion. Neuron 24, 929–940 (1999).
Ponce, C.R., Lomber, S.G. & Born, R.T. Integrating motion and depth via parallel pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 216–223 (2008).
Barlow, H.B., Blakemore, C. & Pettigrew, J.D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 193, 327–342 (1967).
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 195, 215–243 (1968).
Tsao, D.Y. et al. Stereopsis activates V3A and caudal intraparietal areas in macaques and humans. Neuron 39, 555–568 (2003).
Tailby, C., Majaj, N. & Movshon, T. Binocular integration of pattern motion signals by MT neurons and by human observers [Abstract]. J. Vis. 7, 95a (2007).
Majaj, N.J., Tailby, C. & Movshon, J.A. (2007). Motion opponency in area MT of the macaque is mostly monocular [Abstract]. J. Vis. 7, 96a (2007).
Rust, N.C., Mante, V., Simoncelli, E.P. & Movshon, J.A. How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1421–1431 (2006).
Perrone, J.A. & Thiele, A. A model of speed tuning in MT neurons. Vision Res. 42, 1035–1051 (2002).
Simoncelli, E.P. & Heeger, D.J. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vision Res. 38, 743–761 (1998).
Wandell, B.A., Chial, S. & Backus, B.T. Visualization and measurement of the cortical surface. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 739–752 (2000).
Nestares, O. & Heeger, D.J. Robust multiresolution alignment of MRI brain volumes. Magn. Reson. Med. 43, 705–715 (2000).
Glover, G.H. & Lai, S. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Magn. Reson. Med. 39, 361–368 (1998).
Engel, S.A. et al. fMRI of human visual cortex. Nature 369, 525 (1994).
Sereno, M.I. et al. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science 268, 889–893 (1995).
Larsson, J., Landy, M.S. & Heeger, D.J. Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 862–881 (2006).
Brainard, D.H. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997).
Huk, A.C., Ress, D. & Heeger, D.J. Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered. Neuron 32, 161–172 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Ress and T. Czuba for assistance with magnetic resonance imaging and comments on the manuscript and P. Neri for commenting on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by a National Science Foundation CAREER Award (BCS-0748413), a Mind Science Foundation Research Grant, and a pilot scanning grant from the University of Texas at Austin Imaging Research Center to A.C.H., and a Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research grant to B.R. (2006/11353/ALW).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors jointly conceived the project, conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript. B.R. programmed the visual displays and conducted the data analyses.
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–6 (PDF 1876 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rokers, B., Cormack, L. & Huk, A. Disparity- and velocity-based signals for three-dimensional motion perception in human MT+. Nat Neurosci 12, 1050–1055 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2343
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2343
This article is cited by
-
Neurophysiological considerations for visual implants
Brain Structure and Function (2022)
-
Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Binocular viewing geometry shapes the neural representation of the dynamic three-dimensional environment
Nature Neuroscience (2020)
-
Interocular contrast difference drives illusory 3D percept
Scientific Reports (2017)