A three-step MTOC fragmentation mechanism facilitates bipolar spindle assembly in mouse oocytes

Clift, Dean; Schuh, Melina

doi:10.1038/ncomms8217

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 06 July 2015

A three-step MTOC fragmentation mechanism facilitates bipolar spindle assembly in mouse oocytes

Dean Clift¹ &
Melina Schuh¹

Nature Communications volume 6, Article number: 7217 (2015) Cite this article

8553 Accesses
113 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Assembly of a bipolar microtubule spindle is essential for accurate chromosome segregation. In somatic cells, spindle bipolarity is determined by the presence of exactly two centrosomes. Remarkably, mammalian oocytes do not contain canonical centrosomes. This study reveals that mouse oocytes assemble a bipolar spindle by fragmenting multiple acentriolar microtubule-organizing centres (MTOCs) into a high number of small MTOCs to be able to then regroup and merge them into two equal spindle poles. We show that MTOCs are fragmented in a three-step process. First, PLK1 triggers a decondensation of the MTOC structure. Second, BicD2-anchored dynein stretches the MTOCs into fragmented ribbons along the nuclear envelope. Third, KIF11 further fragments the MTOCs following nuclear envelope breakdown so that they can be evenly distributed towards the two spindle poles. Failure to fragment MTOCs leads to defects in spindle assembly, which delay chromosome individualization and congression, putting the oocyte at risk of aneuploidy.

Prc1-rich kinetochores are required for error-free acentrosomal spindle bipolarization during meiosis I in mouse oocytes

Article Open access 27 May 2020

CENP-V is required for proper chromosome segregation through interaction with spindle microtubules in mouse oocytes

Article Open access 11 November 2021

Distinct dynein complexes defined by DYNLRB1 and DYNLRB2 regulate mitotic and male meiotic spindle bipolarity

Article Open access 27 March 2023

Introduction

Every time a cell divides, it needs to assemble a bipolar microtubule spindle to accurately segregate its chromosomes. In mammalian somatic cells, spindle bipolarity is determined by the presence of exactly two centrosomes. At the beginning of mitosis, the centrosomes are paired. To ensure that microtubules are nucleated from two distinct poles, the centrosomes start to migrate to opposite sides of the nucleus before nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD)¹. After NEBD, the centrosomes assemble a bipolar spindle, which captures the chromosomes and segregates them to opposite spindle poles. Extra centrosomes lead to the formation of multipolar spindles and chromosome segregation errors, and have been suggested to be a key cause of aneuploidy in cancer cells^2,3,4. Thus, the number of centrosomes needs to be strictly regulated to ensure that a bipolar spindle assembles. This is achieved by the centrosome cycle, which ensures that centrosomes duplicate only once every cell cycle during the S-phase⁵.

In contrast to somatic cells, mammalian oocytes lack canonical centriole-containing centrosomes⁶. Thus, bipolar spindle assembly needs to be achieved by a different mechanism. In mouse oocytes, spindle microtubules are nucleated by multiple acentriolar microtubule-organizing centres (MTOCs)⁷. These MTOCs contain many of the pericentriolar material components^8,9,10 of centrosomes; however, in contrast to centrosomes, they lack centriole pairs at their core¹¹. How meiotic spindle bipolarity is achieved with multiple MTOCs remains unknown.

In this study we used quantitative live cell microscopy to investigate how a bipolar spindle is assembled from multiple MTOCs in oocytes. Our data uncover a novel mechanism that facilitates spindle assembly in the absence of centrosomes: the MTOCs exhibit remarkable plasticity and undergo a three-step decondensation and fragmentation process, which facilitates the equal distribution of MTOC material between the two spindle poles. Failure to fragment MTOCs leads to the formation of transient monopolar and asymmetric spindles, resulting in delayed bipolar spindle formation and chromosome congression to the spindle equator. MTOC fragmentation is therefore essential for accurate spindle assembly in the absence of centrosomes in mouse oocytes.

Results

MTOCs are fragmented during spindle assembly

To address how spindle bipolarity is achieved from multiple MTOCs, we recorded high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) data sets of MTOCs during spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. MTOCs were visualized with a tagged version of the pericentriolar material component Cep192 (ref. 12), which we found to be a bona fide marker for MTOCs as judged by colocalization with known MTOC components γ-tubulin and Pericentrin (Supplementary Fig. 1). Oocytes assembled a bipolar spindle by first fragmenting the MTOCs into many smaller MTOCs before refocussing them to form the two poles of the meiotic spindle (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Movie 1). To quantify MTOC fragmentation, we reconstructed the MTOCs in proximity of the chromosomes in 3D and measured their number and volume over time (Fig. 1b–f). This revealed that MTOCs were fragmented in two distinct phases: a first phase before NEBD and a second phase after NEBD (Fig. 1c,e; Supplementary Movie 2). During these two phases, the number of MTOCs in proximity of the chromosomes increased from 3±2 to an average maximum of 26±11 (Fig. 1d). Consistent with fragmentation, the average MTOC volume dropped from 30±16 to 7±3 μm³ within the same time frame (Fig. 1f). Our quantitative live analysis of MTOCs is in line with an early ultrastructural study that reported an increase in the number of MTOCs between prophase arrest and the onset of meiotic maturation¹³, confirming that our live cell MTOC marker is representative of endogenous MTOC behaviour. As the two spindle poles assembled, the MTOCs merged again, leading to a decrease in MTOC number and an increase in MTOC volume (Fig. 1).

**Figure 1: MTOCs fragment in two phases during meiotic spindle assembly.**

Our data are consistent with MTOC fragmentation (Fig. 1a–f). However, the MTOC fragments we observe could also be generated as a result of the disassembly of large MTOCs and de novo formation of many smaller MTOCs. To distinguish between fragmentation and de novo formation, we performed a fluorescence pulse-chase experiment to monitor the fate of individual MTOCs during spindle assembly. Cep192 was tagged with the photoconvertible fluorescent protein tdEos, which undergoes irreversible conversion from green to red emission on irradiation with a 405-nm laser line¹⁴. Individual perinuclear MTOCs were photoconverted before spindle assembly, and both unconverted (green) and converted (magenta) MTOCs were imaged as the spindle assembled (Fig. 1g). We saw gradual recovery of unconverted Cep192 at MTOCs during spindle assembly. This is presumably due to Cep192 turnover and the merging with MTOCs recruited from the cytoplasm⁷, which contain unconverted Cep192. Nonetheless, the large majority of MTOCs detected during spindle assembly contained photoconverted Cep192 (Fig. 1g), suggesting that they arose from the fragmentation of MTOCs present before spindle assembly.

BicD2-anchored dynein stretches MTOCs on the nuclear surface

We next addressed the mechanism by which MTOCs were fragmented. In phase I, MTOCs were stretched into ribbons along the nuclear envelope (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). In the majority of oocytes (17/22), MTOC stretching proceeded to such an extent that MTOCs fragmented before NEBD. The stretched MTOCs colocalized with microtubules extending along the nuclear envelope (Supplementary Fig. 2). To test whether MTOC stretching is microtubule-dependent, we depolymerized microtubules with nocodazole. Indeed, we found that the MTOCs were no longer stretched along the nuclear envelope (Fig. 2a). This was quantitatively confirmed by measuring the speed of MTOC elongation in the presence and absence of nocodazole (Fig. 2b), and by quantifying the sphericity of the MTOCs: while the stretching reduced MTOC sphericity in control oocytes, MTOC sphericity stayed constant in nocodazole-treated oocytes (Fig. 2d). These results demonstrate that MTOC stretching depends on microtubules on the nuclear envelope, consistent with qualitative observations made in a previous study¹⁵.

**Figure 2: BicD2-anchored dynein stretches MTOCs along the nuclear envelope.**

Next, we investigated the molecular mechanism that mediates MTOC stretching. It seemed likely that motor proteins associated with microtubules on the nuclear envelope would drive MTOC stretching. One potential candidate was the plus-end-directed kinesin KIF11 (also known as Kinesin-5 or Eg5). KIF11 crosslinks and slides apart antiparallel microtubules and is essential to separate centrosomes from each other before NEBD^16,17. To test whether KIF11 drives MTOC stretching, we inhibited KIF11 with monastrol¹⁸. However, neither the speed of MTOC elongation nor the reduction of MTOC sphericity were perturbed (Fig. 2a,b,e). MTOC stretching did occur earlier with respect to NEBD in monastrol-treated oocytes (Fig. 2a,e), although this is likely due to a delay in NEBD onset caused by monastrol treatment (Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, KIF11 is dispensable for MTOC stretching along the nuclear envelope (Fig. 2a,b,e).

Another important motor protein on the nuclear envelope is dynein. Nuclear envelope-associated dynein is, for instance, involved in nuclear oscillations in neural progenitor cells¹⁹, positioning of nuclei in myotubes²⁰ and has also been implicated in centrosome separation^1,21. To test whether MTOC stretching is dynein-dependent, we inhibited dynein activity in oocytes by expressing P150-CC1, a dominant-negative fragment of dynactin²². Strikingly, dynein inhibition completely blocked the stretching of MTOCs along the nuclear envelope (Fig. 2a,c,f). This is in contrast to a previous study that reported MTOC stretching to be independent of dynein¹⁵. This discrepancy may be explained by insufficient inhibition of dynein by the inhibitor Ciliobrevin-D²³ that was used in the previous study (Supplementary Fig. 4). Since dynein takes over many functions in a cell²⁴, whose inhibition might affect MTOC stretching in an indirect way, we aimed to block dynein function specifically at the nuclear envelope. Dynein is recruited to the nuclear envelope by the adaptor protein BicD2 (refs 21, 25). We found that BicD2 transiently associated with the nuclear envelope while MTOCs were stretched (Fig. 2g,i; Supplementary Movie 3). Consistent with a role for BicD2-recruited dynein in MTOC stretching, BicD2 was enriched at invaginations on the nuclear envelope that contained stretched MTOCs (Fig. 2g). To test the role of nuclear envelope-associated dynein in MTOC stretching directly, we expressed a dominant-negative form of BicD2 (BicD2-CT) that can no longer bind dynein/dynactin²⁵. Similar to global dynein inhibition, BicD2-CT expression completely blocked MTOC stretching on the nuclear envelope (Fig. 2h,j,k; Supplementary Movie 3). BicD2-CT specifically inhibited dynein function at the nuclear envelope because the dynein-dependent movement of cytoplasmic MTOCs was unaffected (Supplementary Fig. 5). These data show that a nuclear envelope-associated pool of dynein that is anchored by BicD2 drives MTOC stretching.

KIF11 drives MTOC fragmentation after NEBD

Next, we investigated the second phase of MTOC fragmentation, which took place after NEBD. In this phase, MTOCs were further fragmented into smaller MTOCs, which were subsequently separated from each other and distributed evenly between two spindle poles (Fig. 1; Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). By imaging MTOCs with high temporal resolution, we were able to track individual fragmentation events occurring after NEBD. This revealed MTOC fragments rapidly separating from each other (Fig. 3a, arrowheads; Supplementary Movie 2). A likely candidate responsible for post-NEBD MTOC fragmentation was KIF11, as this motor protein can drive centrosome separation after NEBD²⁶. We first analysed KIF11 localization during MTOC fragmentation. KIF11 was absent from MTOCs before NEBD (Fig. 3b, arrowheads), which is consistent with our observation that KIF11 is dispensable for MTOC stretching along the nuclear envelope. Consistent with a role in the second phase of MTOC fragmentation, KIF11 was rapidly recruited to microtubules post NEBD and became enriched at the spindle poles during spindle assembly (Fig. 3b,c). To test directly whether post-NEBD MTOC fragmentation requires KIF11, we treated oocytes with monastrol. Consistent with our earlier results, KIF11 inhibition did not affect MTOC fragmentation before NEBD (Fig. 3d, time 0:00). However, MTOC fragmentation stopped immediately after NEBD. Instead, the MTOCs rapidly merged back together to form a single large MTOC at the centre of a monoaster (Fig. 3d,e). To quantify the contribution of KIF11 specifically to post-NEBD MTOC fragmentation, we prevented MTOC fragmentation before NEBD by expressing BicD2-CT. In oocytes expressing BicD2-CT alone, MTOC fragmentation initiated after NEBD, resulting in a sharp increase in MTOC number (Fig. 3f,g). However, addition of monastrol to BicD2-CT-expressing oocytes completely blocked post-NEBD MTOC fragmentation (Fig. 3f,g). The failure to fragment MTOCs after NEBD on KIF11 inhibition could represent a direct role for KIF11 in MTOC fragmentation, or an indirect consequence of monopolar spindle formation. To address this, we allowed bipolar spindles to assemble in the absence of KIF11 activity by simultaneous inhibition of KIF11 and dynein²⁷ (Supplementary Fig. 6). MTOCs failed to fully fragment and split between the two spindle poles in 85% of bipolar spindles that assembled without KIF11 activity (Fig. 3h–j; Supplementary Fig. 6). Together, these results demonstrate that KIF11 promotes MTOC fragmentation after NEBD. Fragmented MTOCs can then be sorted between spindle poles by Hurp-mediated reorganization of spindle microtubules²⁸.

**Figure 3: KIF11 fragments MTOCs after NEBD.**

PLK1-dependent decondensation of MTOC structure

Our results so far show that the sequential action of the two motor proteins, dynein (before NEBD) and KIF11 (after NEBD), drives MTOC fragmentation. Next, we investigated whether MTOC fragmentation is solely driven by the force of microtubule motor proteins or whether changes in MTOC structure facilitate their fragmentation. In mitosis, centrosomes are thought to be connected with each other through a subset of centrosomal proteins, which form a linker between the two mother centrioles. These centrosomal linker proteins dissociate at mitotic entry, which is thought to initiate centrosome separation²⁹. Consistent with previous findings³⁰, we found that the centrosomal linker protein C-Nap1 localized to unfragmented acentriolar MTOCs at the onset of oocyte maturation (Fig. 4a, time −80 min). This suggests that C-Nap1 binds to pericentriolar material independently of centrioles. Remarkably, we found that C-Nap1 dissociated from MTOCs as they fragmented (Fig. 4a,c), and the onset of C-Nap1 dissociation and MTOC fragmentation occurred with similar timing (Fig. 4d).

In mitosis, both C-Nap1 dissociation and centrosome separation are initiated by polo-like kinase PLK1 (ref. 31). To test whether PLK1 drives MTOC fragmentation, we blocked PLK1 activity with the small molecular inhibitor BI 2536 (ref. 32). Indeed, we found that MTOCs remained largely intact when PLK1 was inhibited (Fig. 4b,e), and C-Nap1 remained associated with MTOCs (Fig. 4b,c). This defect in MTOC fragmentation was not due to an inability to recruit or activate the microtubule motor proteins dynein and KIF11 that we identified to drive MTOC fragmentation (Supplementary Fig. 7). We therefore hypothesized that PLK1 is required to modify the structure of MTOCs so that they can be fragmented. To test this hypothesis, we imaged MTOCs with or without BI 2536 in the presence of nocodazole. In this experiment, microtubules are absent (Supplementary Fig. 8) and therefore any contribution from microtubules and motor proteins to MTOC morphology is eliminated, allowing us to specifically study changes in MTOC structure. Strikingly, we found that there was a PLK1-dependent decondensation of MTOC structure around the time when MTOC fragmentation would normally occur (Fig. 4f–j; Supplementary Movie 4). In control oocytes (nocodazole), the volume of MTOCs increased and their density decreased (Fig. 4f,h,i), coinciding with the dissociation of C-Nap1 from MTOCs (Fig. 4f,j). However, when PLK1 was inhibited (nocodazole+BI 2536), MTOC decondensation was completely blocked: MTOCs remained in a condensed state with C-Nap1-associated (Fig. 4g–j). MTOC decondensation was unaffected by persistent and increased levels of C-Nap1 on MTOCs (Supplementary Fig. 9), suggesting that C-Nap1 dissociation per se is not required for this process. Together, these results show that PLK1 is essential for the decondensation of the MTOC structure and MTOC fragmentation.

MTOC fragmentation facilitates bipolar spindle assembly

We next investigated the function of MTOC fragmentation in meiotic spindle assembly. If MTOC fragmentation plays a role in regulating spindle bipolarity, disrupting MTOC fragmentation should perturb spindle assembly. We first tested the role of pre-NEBD MTOC fragmentation in spindle assembly by expressing BicD2-CT to block MTOC stretching on the nuclear envelope. BicD2-CT expression caused an abnormal distribution of microtubules immediately after NEBD: instead of being homogeneously distributed throughout the volume of the former nucleus, microtubules were nucleated only locally, in the area of the unfragmented MTOCs (Supplementary Fig. 10a–c). Nonetheless, BicD2-CT-expressing oocytes quickly recovered and assembled normal bipolar spindles with timing similar to control oocytes (Supplementary Fig. 10a,d–g). Therefore, pre-NEBD MTOC fragmentation is not essential for bipolar spindle assembly, but may facilitate the spindle assembly process by ensuring that all chromosomes are rapidly in contact with microtubules on NEBD. These data also show that KIF11-dependent MTOC fragmentation after NEBD is sufficient to drive bipolar spindle assembly.

To address the role of MTOC fragmentation in spindle assembly, we inhibited PLK1, which we found to completely inhibit the fragmentation of MTOCs (Fig. 4). To analyse potential defects in spindle assembly after PLK1 inhibition, we imaged microtubules together with KIF11 as a reporter for the spindle poles (Fig. 5a). In control oocytes, spindle assembly followed a typical pattern: first, MTOCs nucleated a microtubule mass without well-defined poles (Fig. 5a,b, light grey boxes and bars); second, microtubules were progressively focused to form two equal spindle poles and the spindle elongated (Fig. 5a,b, dark grey boxes and bars). However, bipolar spindle assembly was severely compromised when MTOC fragmentation was blocked by inhibiting PLK1 (Supplementary Movie 5). In contrast to control oocytes, 95% of PLK1-inhibited oocytes assembled transient monopolar spindles (Fig. 5a,b, orange boxes and bars; Fig. 5c). Transient monopolar spindles were also assembled in PLK1-depleted oocytes, and this phenotype could be rescued by expression of human PLK1 (Supplementary Fig. 11), thus confirming the specificity of BI 2536 treatment for PLK1 inhibition in mouse oocytes. These monopolar spindles were nucleated from unfragmented MTOCs residing at the monopole (Fig. 5e; Supplementary Fig. 12b; Supplementary Movie 6). PLK1 inhibition did not significantly reduce the amount of microtubules at MTOCs (Supplementary Fig. 12a–c); however, the total amount of microtubules present during spindle assembly were reduced (Supplementary Fig. 12d). It is unlikely that the reduction in microtubules on PLK1 inhibition contributes to the formation of monopolar spindles because reducing the number of microtubules by other means, for instance, by inhibiting the small GTPase Ran or by low doses of nocodazole, does not lead to monopolar spindles^7,33. Strikingly, in the rare occasions that MTOC fragmentation was delayed well beyond NEBD in control oocytes, transient monopolar spindles identical to those seen on PLK1 inhibition were also assembled (Supplementary Movie 7). Altogether, these data suggest that the transient monopolar spindles seen following PLK1 inhibition are due to a failure in MTOC fragmentation. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that PLK1 additionally regulates bipolar spindle assembly through processes other than MTOC fragmentation. Following the prolonged monopolar spindle phase, the monopole split unequally and a second, smaller spindle pole formed (Fig. 5a,b blue boxes and bars; Supplementary Movies 5 and 6). The asymmetric spindles that were formed in this way persisted for an average of 1.6±1.1 h (Fig. 5a,b, blue boxes and bars). Such asymmetric spindles were also transiently seen on spindle bipolarization in control oocytes (Fig. 5b, blue bars). However, asymmetric spindles in control oocytes quickly equilibrated, possibly driven by the rapid redistribution of fragmented MTOCs (Fig. 1a)²⁸. Indeed, MTOCs were evenly distributed between both poles in the symmetric spindles in control oocytes, but unevenly distributed in the asymmetric spindles caused by PLK1 inhibition (Fig. 5f). The weaker spindle pole sometimes even lacked any detectable MTOCs, indicative of a failure in MTOC fragmentation (Fig. 5f; Supplementary Movie 6). PLK1-inhibited oocytes eventually formed symmetric bipolar spindles (Fig. 5a,b, dark grey boxes and bars); however, the formation of symmetric spindles was significantly delayed compared with control oocytes (Fig. 5d). A similar delay in bipolar spindle assembly was also observed in PLK1-depleted oocytes (Supplementary Fig. 11h,i). Altogether, these results indicate that the PLK1-driven fragmentation of MTOCs promotes the timely assembly of a symmetric bipolar spindle and prevents the formation of monopolar and asymmetric spindles.

**Figure 5: PLK1 activity is required for timely spindle assembly and chromosome congression.**

We next investigated whether the formation of monopolar and asymmetric spindle intermediates on PLK1 inhibition had any consequences for chromosomes in the spindle. Because PLK1 is required to establish kinetochore–microtubule attachments³², which are essential for chromosome alignment and segregation, we analysed earlier events, namely chromosome individualization and chromosome congression, which do not rely on kinetochore–microtubule attachments³⁴. In mouse oocytes, chromosomes are initially clustered around the nucleolus and in the nuclear periphery. Thus, they must be individualized on NEBD. In control oocytes, chromosomes were individualized within less than an hour after NEBD (Fig. 5g,h, time 0:50). However, when PLK1 was inhibited, chromosome individualization was significantly delayed (Fig. 5g,h). Instead, chromosomes remained clumped together towards the ends of microtubules emanating from a monopole (Fig. 5g, time 0:50). This indicates that the formation of an apolar microtubule mass, which depends on MTOC fragmentation, is necessary to ensure the timely individualization of chromosomes following NEBD. Next, we investigated whether chromosome congression was affected when MTOC fragmentation was blocked. In control oocytes, chromosomes began to congress into a prometaphase belt ∼2 h after NEBD (Fig. 5g,i). Inhibition of PLK1 significantly delayed chromosome congression (Fig. 5g,i). This is likely to be caused by the delay in assembling a symmetric spindle in these oocytes, although we cannot exclude the possibility that PLK1 plays a more direct role in chromosome congression. Together, these data show that inhibition of MTOC fragmentation leads to transient monopolar and asymmetric spindles, which delays chromosome individualization and congression in oocytes.

Discussion

In summary, mouse oocytes assemble a bipolar spindle by fragmenting their acentriolar MTOCs into a high number of small MTOCs to be able to then regroup and merge them into two equal spindle poles. This fragmentation of MTOCs is essential for timely assembly of a symmetric bipolar spindle. We show that MTOC fragmentation is achieved in a three-step process that is driven by PLK1 (Fig. 5j). In the first step, PLK1 triggers a decondensation of MTOC structure and the release of the centrosomal linker protein C-Nap1. In the second step, BicD2 recruits dynein to the nuclear envelope, which stretches the MTOCs into ribbons and starts to fragment them. In the third step, KIF11 further fragments the MTOCs so that they can be evenly distributed between two the spindle poles. Blocking MTOC fragmentation leads to defects in spindle assembly, which delay chromosome individualization and congression. It is crucial that oocytes prevent such delays because all chromosomes need to be correctly attached to the spindle by the time the oocyte progresses into anaphase. This is particularly important in oocytes as it takes several hours to correct erroneous kinetochore–microtubule attachments³⁵, and defects in this process are often missed by the spindle assembly checkpoint, which can lead to the production of an aneuploidy egg³⁶.

In addition to revealing how oocytes assemble a bipolar spindle from multiple MTOCs, this study also provides insights into centrosome separation in mitotic cells. Our data show that PLK1 facilitates MTOC fragmentation by triggering the decondensation of the structure of acentriolar MTOCs. PLK1 has also been reported to drive the separation of centrosomes in mitosis³¹. Our data raise the interesting possibility that PLK1 facilitates centrosome separation by decondensation of the pericentriolar material. An important challenge for the future will be to identify the substrate(s) of PLK1 responsible for regulating MTOC structure. Although C-Nap1 and other centrosomal linker proteins dissociate during centrosome separation and MTOC fragmentation, it is unclear whether their dissociation is of functional relevance to MTOC fragmentation and centrosome separation. Since MTOCs in mouse oocytes lack centrioles, C-Nap1 also cannot act as a centriolar linker. Its dissociation from MTOCs might instead be indicative of a PLK1-induced change in the MTOC structure that makes MTOCs nonpermissive for C-Nap1 binding and facilitates MTOC fragmentation in meiosis and centrosome separation in mitosis.

This study also provides new insights into the functional organization of MTOCs. We show that MTOCs exhibit remarkable plasticity: MTOCs can alter their density, be stretched into ribbon-like structures, fragment into many smaller functional units and also merge, all to facilitate different stages of spindle assembly in the oocyte. Interestingly, centrosome fragmentation has also been observed during anaphase of mitosis, which may facilitate the re-establishment of an interphase microtubule array³⁷. Thus, MTOC plasticity may be a general mechanism to rapidly adapt MTOC function to different cellular requirements.

Methods

Preparation and culture of oocytes

All mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment according to UK Home Office regulations. Oocytes were isolated from ovaries of 8-week-old FVBn female mice and cultured in M2 medium covered by mineral oil at 37 °C. Only large oocytes with a centrally located nucleus were used, as these are more likely to be meiotically competent. For experiments where chromosomes were imaged, only those oocytes that had a surround-nucleolar chromosome configuration were used. Isolated oocytes were maintained in a prophase arrest by addition of 250 μm dbcAMP, microinjected with mRNA as described previously⁷ and then released into a dbcAMP-free medium once proteins were expressed, typically 3 h after microinjection. In some experiments, oocytes were treated with 1 μM nocodazole (Sigma), 100 μM monastrol (Sigma), 250 nM BI 2536 (Selleckchem) or corresponding amounts of dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) in controls. We initially tried a range of concentrations of BI 2536 from 100 nM to 1 μM and saw the same phenotypes at all concentrations, which were also observed by PLK1 knockdown with short interfering RNA (siRNAs; Supplementary Fig. 11). We chose to use 250 nM BI 2536 because it is close to the concentrations previously used in cultured mitotic cells (100 nM³²)) and in mouse embryos (500 nM (ref. 38)). For knockdown of PLK1 using RNA interference (RNAi), a mix of the following siRNAs were used: 5′- CCUCUCAAAGUCCUCAAUATT -3′ and 5′- CCACUGUAUGAAUUGUAUATT -3′. For control, a scrambled negative control siRNA was used (Qiagen SI03650318). siRNAs were injected to a final concentration of 30 nM into follicle-enclosed oocytes from 11-day-old (C57BL × CBA) F1 females and then cultured for 9–10 days as described in ref. 39. Oocytes were then isolated from the follicles and cultured as described above. For live imaging of RNAi oocytes, 3D time-lapse images were acquired using Zeiss’s MultiTime Series macro. The entire oocyte (∼90 μm × 90 μm) in the x–y dimension, and a region of 24 μm (five confocal z-sections every 6.0 μm) surrounding the H2B-mRFP1 or mCherry-MAP4 signal in the z-dimension, was imaged every 12 min for a total of ∼12 h following release from dbcAMP, covering NEBD to MII. Under these conditions, 92% (n=51) of ctrl siRNA oocytes extruded a polar body.

RT–qPCR

mRNA was extracted from oocytes using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen) and cDNA was generated using the High-Capacity RNA-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems). Real-time PCR was performed with the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR green. Gapdh mRNA was used for normalization. The following primer sets were used: Gapdh, forward 5′- AGAGCTGAACGGGAAGCTCACT -3′, reverse 5′- TGCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGAT -3′; Plk1, forward 5′- TGTAGTTTTGGAGCTCTGTCG -3′, reverse 5′- TCCCTGTGAATGACCTGATTG -3′.

Expression constructs and mRNA synthesis

To generate the constructs for in vitro mRNA synthesis, we fused the previously published coding sequences with mEGFP (Clontech), mCherry⁴⁰ or tdEos¹⁴ to obtain tdEos-Cep192 (ref. 12), mCherry-BicD2 and mCherry-BicD2-CT²⁵, KIF11-mEGFP⁴¹, C-Nap1-mEGFP⁴², mCherry-MAP4 (ref. 43), mEGFP-H2B⁴⁴, EB3-mCherry⁴⁵, mEGFP-Pericentrin (PACT domain)⁴⁶, mEGFP-α-Tubulin⁴⁷ and mEGFP-PLK1 (ref. 48) and inserted these into pGEMHE for in vitro transcription. The Nek2-K37R construct was generated by inserting the Nek2-coding sequence⁴⁹ into pGEMHE followed by site-directed mutagenesis (Quikchange, Agilent) using the following primers: sense 5′- TGATGGCAAGATATTAGTTTGGAgAGAACTTGACTATGGCTC -3′; antisense 5′- GAGCCATAGTCAAGTTCTcTCCAAACTAATATCTTGCCATCA -3′. These constructs as well as pCR3.1-EGFP-Cep192 and pCR3.1-mCherry-Cep192 (ref. 12), pET28-P150-CC1-His⁵⁰ and pGEMHE-H2B-mRFP1 (ref. 7) were linearized, and capped mRNA was synthesized with T7 polymerase (Ambion mMessage mMachine kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions).

Confocal microscopy

Images were acquired with a Zeiss LSM710 or a Zeiss LSM780 microscope. Microscopes were equipped with a Zeiss environmental incubator box, which for live imaging maintained oocytes at 37 °C without CO₂. Oocytes were imaged with a × 40 C-Apochromat 1.2 NA water-immersion objective for live oocytes and a × 63 C-Apochromat 1.2 NA water-immersion objective for fixed oocytes as described previously⁷. In some images, shot noise was decreased with a Gaussian filter.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Oocytes were fixed for 30–60 min at 37 °C in 100 mM HEPES (pH 7; titrated with KOH), 50 mM EGTA (pH 7; titrated with KOH), 2% formaldehyde (methanol-free) and 0.2% Triton X-100, based on previously published methods⁵¹. Fixed oocytes were incubated in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 overnight at 4 °C. Antibody incubations were performed in PBS, 3% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100. Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-pericentrin (30, BD Biosciences 611815; 1:750), mouse anti-γ-tubulin (GTU88, Sigma T6557; 1:3,000), rat anti-tyrosinated-α-tubulin (YOL1/34, AbD Serotec MCA78G; 1:3,000) and mouse anti-PLK1 (35–206, Abcam Ab17056; 1:1,000). Secondary antibodies used were Alexa-Fluor-488-labelled anti-mouse (Molecular Probes A11029; 1:400) and Alexa-Fluor-647-labelled anti-rat (Molecular Probes A21247; 1:400). DNA was stained with 5 mg ml⁻¹ Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes H3570).

3D reconstruction of MTOCs

To label MTOCs, oocytes were microinjected with mRNAs encoding fluorescently labelled Cep192. 3D time-lapse images were acquired using Zeiss’s MultiTime Series macro. The entire oocyte (∼90 μm × 90 μm) in the x–y dimension, and a region of 37.5 μm (25 confocal z-sections every 1.5 μm) surrounding the H2B-mRFP1 signal in the z-dimension, was imaged every 10 min for a total of ∼12 h following release from dbcAMP, covering NEBD to MII. Under these conditions, 88% (n=90) of oocytes extruded a polar body, compared with 91% (n=109) of nonimaged oocytes. We segmented the MTOCs by applying a threshold using the isosurface function of Imaris (Bitplane) and manually removed MTOCs that were not incorporated into the spindle region. The threshold value used for 3D reconstruction of MTOCs was determined on an oocyte-to-oocyte basis depending on the MTOC signal to noise within each oocyte. Cep192 was chosen over other MTOC markers such as Pericentrin because of the high MTOC signal-to-noise ratio (Supplementary Fig. 1c), allowing small MTOCs to be visualized. Values for the number and volume of MTOCs were exported into Microsoft Excel.

Quantification of MTOC stretching

Oocytes were microinjected and imaged as described for 3D reconstruction of MTOCs. Values for MTOC sphericity were calculated as the ratio of the surface area of a sphere (with the same volume as the given MTOC) to the surface area of the MTOC. The speed of MTOC stretching was calculated by measuring the change in length of MTOCs in the direction of MTOC stretching over time and divided by two, to obtain the speed of MTOC elongation at the leading edge.

Fluorescence intensity measurements

To measure C-Nap1 intensity relative to MTOCs, oocytes expressing mEGFP-C-Nap1 and mCherry-Cep192 were imaged (25 z-confocal sections every 1.5 μm, 10-min intervals). MTOCs were segmented by applying a threshold in the Cep192 channel using the isosurface function of Imaris. The mean intensities for mEGFP-C-Nap1 and mCherry-Cep192 within the MTOC region were measured using Imaris and exported into Microsoft Excel. For background subtraction, the intensity in an area outside the oocyte was measured. The ratio of the mean C-Nap1 intensity to the mean Cep192 intensity was calculated and normalized to the initial value. To measure KIF11 intensity, oocytes expressing mEGFP-KIF11 and mCherry-MAP4 were imaged (seven z-confocal sections every 4 μm, 10-min intervals). The microtubules were segmented by applying a threshold in the mCherry-MAP4 channel using the isosurface function of Imaris. The mean intensity of KIF11-mEGFP in the microtubule region was measured, background-subtracted and normalized to the initial value. To measure total microtubule intensities, oocytes expressing mCherry-MAP4 or EB3-mCherry were imaged and the microtubule signal segmented by applying a threshold in the mCherry-MAP4 or EB3-mCherry channels using the isosurface function of Imaris. Total intensities (mean intensity × volume) were measured using Imaris and exported into Microsoft Excel.

Statistics

Average (mean), s.d. and statistical significance based on Student’s t-test (two-tailed) for absolute values or Fisher’s exact test (two-tailed) for category values were calculated in Microsoft Excel. All box plots show the median (line), mean (small square), 1st, 99th (crosses), 5th, 95th (whiskers) and 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes).

Additional information

How to cite this article: Clift, D. and Schuh, M. A three-step MTOC fragmentation mechanism facilitates bipolar spindle assembly in mouse oocytes. Nat. Commun. 6:7217 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8217 (2015).

References

Tanenbaum, M. E. & Medema, R. H. Mechanisms of centrosome separation and bipolar spindle assembly. Dev. Cell 19, 797–806 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ganem, N. J., Godinho, S. A. & Pellman, D. A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 460, 278–282 (2009).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Silkworth, W. T., Nardi, I. K., Scholl, L. M. & Cimini, D. Multipolar spindle pole coalescence is a major source of kinetochore mis-attachment and chromosome mis-segregation in cancer cells. PLoS ONE 4, e6564 (2009).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Holland, A. J. & Cleveland, D. W. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 478–487 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bettencourt-Dias, M. & Glover, D. M. Centrosome biogenesis and function: centrosomics brings new understanding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 451–463 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Manandhar, G., Schatten, H. & Sutovsky, P. Centrosome reduction during gametogenesis and its significance. Biol. Reprod. 72, 2–13 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Schuh, M. & Ellenberg, J. Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell 130, 484–498 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Palacios, M. J., Joshi, H. C., Simerly, C. & Schatten, G. Gamma-tubulin reorganization during mouse fertilization and early development. J. Cell Sci. 104, 383–389 (1993).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gueth-Hallonet, C. et al. gamma-Tubulin is present in acentriolar MTOCs during early mouse development. J. Cell Sci. 105, 157–166 (1993).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carabatsos, M. J., Combelles, C. M., Messinger, S. M. & Albertini, D. F. Sorting and reorganization of centrosomes during oocyte maturation in the mouse. Microsc. Res. Tech. 49, 435–444 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Szollosi, D., Calarco, P. & Donahue, R. P. Absence of centrioles in the first and second meiotic spindles of mouse oocytes. J. Cell Sci. 11, 521–541 (1972).
CAS Google Scholar
Gomez-Ferreria, M. A. et al. Human Cep192 is required for mitotic centrosome and spindle assembly. Curr. Biol. 17, 1960–1966 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Calarco, P. G. Centrosome precursors in the acentriolar mouse oocyte. Microsc. Res. Tech. 49, 428–434 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nienhaus, G. U. et al. Photoconvertible fluorescent protein EosFP: biophysical properties and cell biology applications. Photochem. Photobiol. 82, 351–358 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Łuksza, M., Queguigner, I., Verlhac, M.-H. & Brunet, S. Rebuilding MTOCs upon centriole loss during mouse oogenesis. Dev. Biol. 382, 48–56 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
Cross, R. A. & McAinsh, A. Prime movers: the mechanochemistry of mitotic kinesins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 257–271 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kapoor, T. M., Mayer, T. U., Coughlin, M. L. & Mitchison, T. J. Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5. J. Cell Biol. 150, 975–988 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mayer, T. U. et al. Small molecule inhibitor of mitotic spindle bipolarity identified in a phenotype-based screen. Science 286, 971–974 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hu, D. J. et al. Dynein recruitment to nuclear pores activates apical nuclear migration and mitotic entry in brain progenitor cells. Cell 154, 1300–1313 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cadot, B. et al. Nuclear movement during myotube formation is microtubule and dynein dependent and is regulated by Cdc42, Par6 and Par3. EMBO Rep. 13, 741–749 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, J. A. et al. Nuclear envelope-associated dynein drives prophase centrosome separation and enables Eg5-independent bipolar spindle formation. EMBO J. 31, 4179–4190 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Quintyne, N. J. et al. Dynactin is required for microtubule anchoring at centrosomes. J. Cell Biol. 147, 321–334 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Firestone, A. J. et al. Small-molecule inhibitors of the AAA+ ATPase motor cytoplasmic dynein. Nature 484, 125–129 (2012).
Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
Kardon, J. R. & Vale, R. D. Regulators of the cytoplasmic dynein motor. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 854–865 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Splinter, D. et al. Bicaudal D2, Dynein, and Kinesin-1 associate with nuclear pore complexes and regulate centrosome and nuclear positioning during mitotic entry. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000350 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Whitehead, C. M. & Rattner, J. B. Expanding the role of HsEg5 within the mitotic and post-mitotic phases of the cell cycle. J. Cell Sci. 111, 2551–2561 (1998).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mitchison, T. J. et al. Roles of polymerization dynamics, opposed motors, and a tensile element in governing the length of Xenopus extract meiotic spindles. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 3064–3076 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Breuer, M. et al. HURP permits MTOC sorting for robust meiotic spindle bipolarity, similar to extra centrosome clustering in cancer cells. J. Cell Biol. 191, 1251–1260 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mardin, B. R. & Schiebel, E. Breaking the ties that bind: new advances in centrosome biology. J. Cell Biol. 197, 11–18 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sonn, S., Oh, G. T. & Rhee, K. Nek2 and its substrate, centrobin/Nip2, are required for proper meiotic spindle formation of the mouse oocytes. Zygote 19, 15–20 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mardin, B. R., Agircan, F. G., Lange, C. & Schiebel, E. Plk1 controls the Nek2A-PP1γ antagonism in centrosome disjunction. Curr. Biol. 21, 1145–1151 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lénárt, P. et al. The small-molecule inhibitor BI 2536 reveals novel insights into mitotic roles of polo-like kinase 1. Curr. Biol. 17, 304–315 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Dumont, J. et al. A centriole- and RanGTP-independent spindle assembly pathway in meiosis I of vertebrate oocytes. J. Cell Biol. 176, 295–305 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Brunet, S. et al. Kinetochore fibers are not involved in the formation of the first meiotic spindle in mouse oocytes, but control the exit from the first meiotic M phase. J. Cell Biol. 146, 1–12 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kitajima, T. S., Ohsugi, M. & Ellenberg, J. Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes. Cell 146, 568–581 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jones, K. T. & Lane, S. I. R. Molecular causes of aneuploidy in mammalian eggs. Development 140, 3719–3730 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rusan, N. M. & Wadsworth, P. Centrosome fragments and microtubules are transported asymmetrically away from division plane in anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 168, 21–28 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Baran, V., Solc, P., Kovarikova, V., Rehak, P. & Sutovsky, P. Polo-like kinase 1 is essential for the first mitotic division in the mouse embryo. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 80, 522–534 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pfender, S. et al. Live imaging RNAi screen reveals genes essential for meiosis in mammalian oocytes. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14568 (2015).
Shaner, N. C. et al. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1567–1572 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kaseda, K., McAinsh, A. D. & Cross, R. A. Dual pathway spindle assembly increases both the speed and the fidelity of mitosis. Biol. Open 1, 12–18 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Mayor, T., Hacker, U., Stierhof, Y. D. & Nigg, E. A. The mechanism regulating the dissociation of the centrosomal protein C-Nap1 from mitotic spindle poles. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3275–3284 (2002).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Olson, K. R. & Olmsted, J. B. in Methods in Enzymology Vol. 302, ed. Conn P. M. 103–120Academic Press (1999).
Article Google Scholar
Kanda, T., Sullivan, K. F. & Wahl, G. M. Histone–GFP fusion protein enables sensitive analysis of chromosome dynamics in living mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 8, 377–385 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stepanova, T. et al. Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use of EB3-GFP (End-Binding Protein 3-Green Fluorescent Protein). J. Neurosci. 23, 2655–2664 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gillingham, A. K. & Munro, S. The PACT domain, a conserved centrosomal targeting motif in the coiled‐coil proteins AKAP450 and pericentrin, Vol. 1 EMBO Rep. 1, 524–529 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mora-Bermudez, F., Gerlich, D. & Ellenberg, J. Maximal chromosome compaction occurs by axial shortening in anaphase and depends on Aurora kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 822–831 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lindon, C. & Pines, J. Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 164, 233–241 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hames, R. S. & Fry, A. M. Alternative splice variants of the human centrosome kinase Nek2 exhibit distinct patterns of expression in mitosis. Biochem. J. 361, 77–85 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Courtois, A., Schuh, M., Ellenberg, J. & Hiiragi, T. The transition from meiotic to mitotic spindle assembly is gradual during early mammalian development. J. Cell Biol. 198, 357–370 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Strickland, L. et al. Light microscopy of echinoderm embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 74, 371–409 (2004).
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank David Sharp for the pCR3.1-EGFP-Cep192 construct; Anna Akhmanova for the Bicd2 and Bicd2-CT cDNAs; Andrew McAinsh for the KIF11 cDNA; Erich Nigg for the C-NAP1 cDNA; Sean Munro for the Pericentrin PACT domain cDNA; Andrew Fry for the NEK2 cDNA; Jonathon Pines for the PLK1 cDNA; Takashi Hiragii for the pET28-P150-CC1-His construct; and members of the Schuh laboratory for helpful discussions. The research leading to these results has received financial support from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 241548 and from European Research Council (ERC) Starting grant no. 337415.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Medical Research Council, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK
Dean Clift & Melina Schuh

Authors

Dean Clift
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Melina Schuh
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.C. and M.S. designed the study and analysed data. D.C. carried out all experiments. D.C and M.S. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melina Schuh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-12. (PDF 1579 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

MTOCs fragment and merge during meiotic spindle assembly. (Left) 3D time-lapse imaging of MTOCs from an oocyte expressing EGFPCep192 (green, MTOCs) and H2B-mRFP1 (magenta, chromosomes). Zprojection, 25 sections, every 1.5 μm. (Right) 3D reconstruction of MTOCs from same oocyte. Time, h:min from NEBD. Same oocyte as shown in Fig. 1a,b. (MOV 675 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

MTOCs fragment in two phases. 3D time-lapse imaging of MTOCs from an oocyte expressing EGFP-Cep192 (green, MTOCs) and H2B-mRFP1 (magenta, chromosomes). Z-projection, 25 sections, every 1.5 μm. Time, h:min from NEBD. Supplementary movie 3 MTOC stretching coincid (MOV 574 kb)

Supplementary Movie 3

MTOC stretching coincides with BicD2 recruitment to the nuclear envelope and requires BicD2-dynein interaction. 3D time-lapse imaging of oocytes expressing EGFP-Cep192 (green, MTOCs) and mCherry-BicD2 (magenta, left) or mCherry-BicD2-CT (magenta, right). Zprojection, 25 sections, every 1.5 μm. Time, minutes from NEBD. Same oocytes as shown in Fig. 2g,h. (MOV 224 kb)

Supplementary Movie 4

PLK1-dependenent decondensation of MTOC structure. 3D time-lapse imaging of MTOCs from oocytes expressing EGFP-Cep192 treated with nocodazole or nocodazole + BI 2536. Z-projection, 17 sections, every 1.5 μm. Time, h:min from NEBD. Same oocytes as shown in Fig. 4f,g. (MOV 40 kb)

Supplementary Movie 5

PLK1 inhibition causes transient monopolar spindles. 3D Time-lapse imaging in control and BI 2536 treated live mouse oocytes expressing KIF11-mEGFP (green, spindle poles) and mCherry-MAP4 (magenta, microtubules). Z-projection, 7 sections, every 4 μm. Time, h:min from NEBD. Same oocytes as shown in Fig. 5a. (MOV 1905 kb)

Supplementary Movie 6

MTOC dynamics and spindle assembly upon PLK1 inhibition D Time-lapse imaging of a BI 2536-treated live mouse oocyte expressing EGFPCep192 (green, MTOCs) and mCherry-MAP4 (magenta, microtubules). Zprojection, 25 sections, every 1.5 μm. Time, h:min from NEBD (MOV 928 kb)

Supplementary Movie 7

Delayed MTOC fragmentation in control oocytes causes transient monopolar spindles 3D Time-lapse imaging of a live mouse oocyte expressing EGFP-Cep192 (green, MTOCs) and mCherry-MAP4 (magenta, microtubules). Z-projection, 25 sections, every 1.5 μm. Time, h:min from NEBD. (MOV 426 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clift, D., Schuh, M. A three-step MTOC fragmentation mechanism facilitates bipolar spindle assembly in mouse oocytes. Nat Commun 6, 7217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8217

Download citation

Received: 12 September 2014
Accepted: 20 April 2015
Published: 06 July 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8217

This article is cited by

Male meiotic spindle poles are stabilized by TACC3 and cKAP5/chTOG differently from female meiotic or somatic mitotic spindles in mice
- Calvin Simerly
- Emily Robertson
- Gerald Schatten
Scientific Reports (2024)
Actin-driven chromosome clustering facilitates fast and complete chromosome capture in mammalian oocytes
- Katarina Harasimov
- Julia Uraji
- Melina Schuh
Nature Cell Biology (2023)
A monoastral mitotic spindle determines lineage fate and position in the mouse embryo
- Oz Pomp
- Hui Yi Grace Lim
- Nicolas Plachta
Nature Cell Biology (2022)
MDC1 is essential for G2/M transition and spindle assembly in mouse oocytes
- Jiyeon Leem
- Jeong Su Oh
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2022)
Two mechanisms drive pronuclear migration in mouse zygotes
- Kathleen Scheffler
- Julia Uraji
- Melina Schuh
Nature Communications (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.