Abstract
How the vast majority of B cells express only one of the two alleles at their immunoglobulin loci remains a biological puzzle. Here, in mice reconstituted with a single haematopoietic stem cell, we demonstrate that each of the two immunoglobulin heavy chain (Igh) alleles has a similar probability to be the first to undergo VH to DJH rearrangement. We also observe this similar probability in clones from multipotent and common lymphoid precursors. The extreme biases in the expression of the alleles that we find in more differentiated subsets are mostly due to constraints imposed by early rearrangements. Our data demonstrate that each of the two Igh alleles in a B cell behaves independently of the other, up to the moment when a successful rearrangement in one allele triggers a feedback mechanism that prevents further recombination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Each B cell expresses immunoglobulin heavy chains at its surface, typically encoded by only one of the two alleles1. The question of why this phenomenon of allelic exclusion occurs has generated a number of non-exclusive and untested answers. For instance, it could be a solution to produce one or a limited set of antigen receptors per cell, as postulated by the clonal selection theory2, or a safety mechanism to decrease the chances of detrimental translocations3, since antigen receptor genes undergo somatic recombination4. How allelic exclusion arises would seem to be more tractable; however, this is an ongoing question since the 1960s. Mostly because of the imprecise junction of the VH, DH and JH gene segments that are found in the immunoglobulin heavy chain (Igh) locus, only a minor proportion of the rearrangements will be ‘productive’ or VHDJH+ (encoding a full-length chain), which intrinsically ensures some level of allelic exclusion. However, for the murine Igh locus, a minimal stochastic model of allelic exclusion based exclusively on the outcome of the rearrangement process5 is insufficient to account for the degree of exclusion observed at the surface of the cells6.
The DH to JH rearrangement step occurs in both Igh alleles7. This event has recently been proposed to mark the DJH junction for secondary rearrangement, that is, the VH to DJH stage8, and once a productive secondary rearrangement takes place in one of the alleles of the pro-B cell, expression of the pre-B-cell receptor (pre-BCR) at the surface signals a series of events leading to the shutdown of recombination at the second allele. This feedback mechanism, first suggested for the immunoglobulin kappa locus9, and subsequently elaborated for the Igh locus10, has been independently confirmed in a number of ways. Notably, a μH chain encoded by a transgene or a knocked-in allele inhibits VH to DJH rearrangement at the endogenous Igh locus only if expressed at the surface, as part of the pre-BCR11,12,13. In addition, in cells with genotypic inclusion (with both alleles rearranged productively) only one of the chains pairs efficiently with the surrogate light chain14 that also forms the pre-BCR and the frequency of cells with genotypic inclusion (VHDJH+/VHDJH+) increases in the absence of the surrogate light chain15 or when the signalling from an intact pre-BCR is perturbed by mutations in one of its downstream targets16. More recently, two additional feedback mechanisms have been proposed, one triggered by an Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM)-dependent sensing of the rearrangement at the first Igh allele3 and the other by a stable μH mRNA with a premature stop codon that cannot be translated into a μH chain17. Overall, feedback inhibition and the rearrangement of the second allele in its absence largely explain the proportion of VHDJH+/DJH and VHDJH+/VHDJH+/− IgM+ B cells18.
The events initially leading to VH to DJH rearrangement that render the VH regions ‘accessible’ for rearrangement include the relocalization of the Igh locus away from the nuclear periphery in pro-B cells19 and long-range interactions mediated by looping of the Igh domains20,21 that depend on regulatory regions, namely the one located in the VH to DH intergenic region22. However, it is unclear whether a specific mechanism ensures that each cell only tests one VH to DJH rearrangement at a time. The acquisition of competence to undergo rearrangement by the Igh locus in the course of B-cell differentiation has been described at the molecular level (for example, ref. 23); however, typically these studies are carried out in bulk cultures, averaging out any existing differences between the alleles at the single-cell level. In turn, imaging-assisted studies (for example, refs 19, 20, 21, 24) can discriminate between the alleles at the single-cell level, but measure features that are only correlates of VH(DH)JH accessibility, which are not always confirmed by different techniques25, and provide mere snapshots of a process that is essentially dynamic.
Here we performed a clonal analysis of Igh allelic exclusion, and provide conclusive evidence that the allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin receptor loci differs from X-chromosome inactivation, as no stable epigenetic mark is propagated until pro-B cells start rearranging. More importantly, we also show that the Igh alleles rearrange independently from each other in the majority of clones derived from common lymphoid precursors.
Results
Clonal analysis tracks V(D)J recombination
Clonal analysis is typically used to investigate the commitment of precursor cells to a given lineage or set of lineages. We have adapted this technique to test whether an Igh allele from a precursor cell is committed to recombine a VH segment before the other allele as the cell divides and enters the lymphoid lineage. As shown in Fig. 1, although in a bulk culture it is not possible to conclude whether the alleles from cells heterozygous for the Igh locus (Igha/b) are differently committed for rearrangement, in isolated clones the commitment and non-commitment scenarios produce sharply different outcomes. In the case of commitment, all the cells expressing the μ chain from the first allele to rearrange (in Fig. 1a, IgMa) would have the second allele in the non-VH-rearranged DJH configuration and the remaining IgM+ cells (in Fig. 1a, IgMb) would have the second allele in the VHDJH configuration. In contrast, if commitment does not occur (Fig. 1b), the IgMa and IgMb pools of cells would not differ in the status of rearrangement of the silenced allele, since each pool would have the same proportion of IgM+ cells with a unique VH to DJH rearrangement versus cells that were rescued by the second VH to DJH rearrangement. Thus, DH to JH and VH to DJH junctions function as a natural reporter system, since the signature junction sequences somatically introduced in the Igh locus help to ascertain when rearrangement occurred in each clone as the cells divide.
Both Igh alleles can rearrange first in clones derived from HSC
The main feature of the Igh locus and other antigen receptor loci is V(D)J recombination; however, these genes are frequently included in a growing group of autosomal genes displaying what has been called random monoallelic expression26. Unlike loci under parental origin-specific imprinting, in these genes roughly 50% of the cells express the maternal allele and the remaining 50% express the paternal allele. Since the parallel with X-chromosome inactivation has been made in several reports27,28,29 and haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) show X-chromosome inactivation, we first asked whether in mice with single-HSC-derived haematopoietic systems, the emerging IgMa and IgMb populations would also show signs of a commitment that is already present in the HSC and that is then stably propagated.
Cells heterozygous for a pan-leukocitary marker polymorphism (CD45.1/45.2), the Igh allotypes (Igha/b) and the X-linked gene Foxp3 and its gfp-fused knock-in (Foxp3gfp/wt) were single-cell-sorted from the HSC-long-term repopulation potential-enriched Lin−Rho−CD45intHoe− side population (SP) pool of C57BL/6J female bone marrows (BMs; see Methods; Supplementary Fig. 1). Sublethally irradiated B6-Rag2−/− was then single-cell-reconstituted and monitored over time to detect animals showing chimerism in the blood. The percentage of reconstituted animals was 4.8–22.9%. This low efficiency is in the range of what has been described30, and further increases the likelihood of obtaining a collection mainly composed of animals with monoclonal haematopoietic systems. Animals with chimerism (N=15) were euthanized within 8–18 weeks from the single-cell transplant, analysed by flow cytometry for the presence of lymphoid and myeloid cells and in some cases used to produce secondary recipients, attesting to their long-term repopulation potential (Table 1). The collection analysed for allelic exclusion comprised animals that were long-term and short-term reconstituted.
Female donor cells heterozygous both for the X-linked Foxp3 and Igh loci were used to compare in the same experiment X-chromosome inactivation with Igh allelic exclusion. FOXP3 is a transcription factor expressed by regulatory T cells (Tregs). Owing to X-chromosome inactivation, in heterozygous animals for a knock-in green fluorescent protein (GFP fusion protein; Foxp3gfp/wt)31 only 50% of Tregs are green (Fig. 2a). Control animals reconstituted with 1,000 HSC-enriched SP cells reproduced this balanced bimodal distribution of the GFP signal in Tregs (Fig. 2a, Table 1), which became biased when less cells were used in the reconstitution and strictly unimodal (0% GFP or 100% GFP) in monoclonal haematopoietic systems. We confirmed that each individual HSC has one inactivated X-chromosome and that inactivation is a stable epigenetic property, functioning here as an internal control for the monoclonality of the reconstitutions.
We then analysed Igh allelic exclusion in the single HSC-reconstituted animals. We consistently found roughly equal numbers of IgMa and IgMb B cells per animal (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 2), similar to what is found in polyclonal haematopoietic systems6. This observation is in sharp contrast to the X-chromosome inactivation data and suggests the lack of stable allelic commitment in the Igh; however, as explained above, the definitive read-out relies on the examination of the rearrangement status of the non-expressed allele. Thus, a quantitative PCR assay was designed to measure the fraction of alleles that retain the VH–DH intergenic region, which is excised as an episome during VH to DJH recombination and is diluted out as the pre-BCR-expressing cell divides and progresses in development (Fig. 2b). The assay reports the expected differences in the retention of the VH–DH intergenic fragment in Rag2−/− pro-B cells (100%) and splenic B cells from wild-type (WT) animals (roughly 60% of cells in VHDJH/DJH configuration and 40% in the VHDJH/VHDJH configuration32, which equals 30% of retention), Jht+/− IgM+ cells (the knockout allele cannot rearrange and therefore all IgM+ cells are in the VHDJH/germline configuration33, which equals 50% intergenic fragment retention) and Atm−/− (which have an intergenic fragment retention below that of WT animals3). If allelic commitment exists before rearrangement, then the isolated IgMa and IgMb subpopulations of a given clone must differ drastically in the amount of the VH–DH intergenic fragment retained (50 versus 0%); however, we did not detect any difference in the four animals analysed (Fig. 2c). Similarly, if allelic pre-commitment exists, the cells would carry a productive rearrangement in the pre-committed allele (either IgMa or IgMb) together with no VH rearrangement in the other, while the cells expressing the other allele would have roughly the same number of productive and non-productive rearrangements. Since the VHDJH+/VHDJH− ratio may change depending on the VH family, we matched the type of families selected for analysis per isolated fraction, focusing on the most prominent families: J558 and 7183. We did not find any striking difference in the frequency of VHDJH+ and VHDJH− rearrangements of IgMa and IgMb-isolated splenic B cells from the monoclonally reconstituted animals (Fig. 2d). Taken together, these data conclusively show that, contrary to X-chromosome inactivation, there is no stable propagation of an allelic commitment to rearrange first the VH segment in the clones that emerge from a single HSC and differentiate in vivo into pro-B cells.
IgMa/b expression becomes skewed in clones derived from CLP
We next asked whether Igh allelic commitment for VH to DJH rearrangement would emerge at some stage during the lineage differentiation to pro-B cells, by applying the previous clonal approach to progressively more differentiated precursor cells. Given the low expansion potential of more differentiated precursors compared with the HSC, we did not reconstitute mice with single B-cell precursors, and used instead a cell culture system. Single cells from pools enriched for HSCs, multipotent progenitors (MPPs), common lymphoid precursors (CLPs) or Pro-B cells were plated under stimulation conditions that are routinely used to mimic the development that occurs in the BM34. As expected, the B-cell-plating efficiency increased from HSCs to CLPs (see Methods; Supplementary Fig. 4), while the time required to detect surface IgM expression decreased. In Fig. 3a, we plot the percentage of IgMa-expressing cells (relative to total IgM+) per clone growing from seeded HSCs, MPPs and CLPs. As expected, within each group the distribution of IgMa- and IgMb-expressing cells is similar. However, the dispersion of each of these percentages is much more pronounced in the clones emerging from CLPs than in the clones resulting from the HSCs and the MMP progenitors (CLP versus MPP, P=4.5 × 10−12 by F-test; CLP versus HSC, P=1.1 × 10−5 by F-test). Notably, the collection of the CLP-derived clones includes examples of clones completely skewed to IgMa or IgMb (Fig. 3b). Given the heterogeneous nature of the CLP populations, we decided to further dissect them to identify the earliest population containing progenitors with potential for the highly biased expression of IgMa or IgMb. The surface marker Ly6d (Fig. 3c) identifies one population (Ly6d−) that conserves the full lymphoid potential and one population (Ly6d+) that is to date the earliest B-cell progenitor35. We could confirm that, under conditions promoting B-cell differentiation, the B-cell-plating efficiency of the Lyd6− CLP-derived clones was at least 10 × lower than in Ly6d+ CLP-derived clones (in one experiment, 15 wells presented colonies out of 960 single-cell Lyd6− CLP-plated cells, while 68 wells presented colonies out of 384 single-cell-plated Lyd6+ CLP-plated cells). We observed that the highly skewed clones are more frequent in the Ly6d+ pool (Fig. 3d), although the difference is not statistically significant. We have further differentiated B-cell clones from whole B220+CD43+ pro-B cells and from the fraction B and found that, although the lower expansion potential of pro-B cells originated smaller clones, CLP- and B220+CD43+-derived clones have a similar frequency of skewed clones (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Fraction B presented an even lower expansion potential, which precluded further molecular analysis. We have also compared Igh and Igκ loci with respect to the allelic bias observed in in vitro CLP-derived clones from mice heterozygous for both Igh and light chain immunoglobulin loci (B6.Cg-Igha/b, hCκ/mCκ). The Igh locus typically rearranges before the kappa light chain and usually four to six cell divisions occur between the rearrangement of these immunoglobulin genes36,37. As observed in Fig. 3e,f, the bias observed for the Igh is not reproduced for the Igκ (P=0.00046 by F-test) presumably because the number of cells rearranging the Igκ alleles independently is much higher than the number of cells rearranging the Igh alleles within the clone. The balanced ratio of the Igκ-expressing cells also suggests that the Igκ locus is not pre-committed in the CLP stage of B-cell development. Taken together, these data show that both the probability of finding clones with allelic bias and the degree of bias increase as the stage at which the cells are seeded gets closer to the time of V(D)J rearrangement.
Independent recruitment of Igh alleles in CLP-derived clones
Different scenarios could explain the distribution of the IgMa and IgMb percentages in CLP-derived clones (Fig. 3a). In the first scenario, the clones would be synchronized for V(D)J rearrangement and in each clone there would be a wave of IgMa (or IgMb)-expressing cells followed by a partially overlapping second wave of IgMb (or IgMa) cells. In this scenario, consistent with an asymmetric allele choice for rearrangement within each clone, the time point at which the clones were analysed would only be a snapshot, failing to capture the ongoing dynamics in the cultures. We have sampled the cultures at different time points and found no clear evidence for the existence of such waves in the majority of clones (Supplementary Fig. 5). The remaining scenarios can be distinguished by the status of rearrangement of the silent allele in the IgMa and IgMb populations of each clone. This status was estimated with the real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) of the VH–DH intergenic fragment and also by sequencing VHDJH and DJH rearrangements from the sorted populations, taking into account polymorphisms downstream of JH1, JH2 and JH3 segments that enable us to assign rearrangements to the BALB/c (Igha) or C57BL/6 (Ighb) allotypes. We first examined the CLP-derived clones with both the IgMa and IgMb pools clearly discernible and balanced with the help of flow cytometry (Fig. 4a,b). In the genome of these IgM+ populations, the percentage of VH–DH intergenic fragment retention when compared with the Rag2−/− genome was typically between 40% (similar to the mean retention observed in non-clonal in vitro-derived IgM+ cells, Fig. 4a) and 50% (the percentage in the genome of non-clonal in vitro-derived IgM+ cells of Jht+/− mice). More importantly, within the same clone, the IgMa and IgMb genomes retain approximately the same percentage of the VH–DH intergenic fragment, which means that each allele can undergo VH to DJH rearrangement first (Figs 1 and 4a). Furthermore, we sequenced DJH and VHDJH rearrangements and found diverse VH–DJH junctions as well as diverse DH–JH junctions, and a limited number of these DH–JH junctions contributing to the diverse VHDJH rearrangements per clone. This shows that the Ly6d+ single-cell-sorted cells are devoid of DH–JH rearrangements before culture, and suggests that in some clones we are testing subclonal expansions and tracking the choice to rearrange shortly before the decision to undergo VH to DJH rearrangement. Representatively, in clone Xp40, the same two DJH junctions (one originating from the Ighb allele and the other from the Igha allele) prevail in the genome of the IgMa, IgMb and IgM− pools (Table 2). The Ighb DJH junction is shown to be predominantly contributing to the diverse VHDJH+ rearrangements of the IgMb+ pool and in IgMa pool the same DJH junction is part of non-productive (VHDJH−) and the same junction was detected in the germline-DJH configuration, while the dominant Igha DJH junction was detected as part of productive (VHDJH+) rearrangements in the IgMa cell pool and in non-productive and DJH rearrangements in the IgMb pool. Different DJH junctions are detected in all three fractions of the clone but were not detected as part of VHDJH rearrangements. From the analysis of rearrangements we conclude that the culture system mimics the features of V(D)J recombination in vivo and that considerable intraclonal diversity is generated in our clones, extending previous observations made in human B-cell lines38. More importantly, we observed that any of the alleles can undergo VH to DJH rearrangement first within each clone.
Founder effects in highly skewed clones
The most striking behaviour of the CLP-derived clones is the extreme bias displayed by some clones (Figs 3a,b and 5). This pattern could emerge from a pre-determined choice to rearrange a given allele first, if the culture conditions do not favour the second attempt to rearrange VH to DJH. The comparison between the amount of VH–DH intergenic fragment in IgM+ non-clonal cell populations differentiated in vivo and in vitro shows that in culture conditions there is indeed a minor increase in the retention of the VH–DH intergenic fragment (41.6±5.8% versus 34.1±4.9%), but a sizable proportion of cells have two rearrangements (Supplementary Fig. 5). Thus, it is difficult to explain the extreme skewing observed in these clones solely by attributing a fixed choice in the allele to undergo VH to DJH rearrangement. Next, the status of rearrangement of the expressed and silent alleles in the clones was investigated. In the 18 IgM+ populations of the CLP-derived clones with both IgMa and IgMb clearly distinguishable (Fig. 4a), no example was found of a population with a VH–DH intergenic fragment below 30%. However, in the 10 IgM+ populations from CLP-derived clones with extreme biases, three populations have a percentage of VH–DH intergenic fragment below 30% (P=0.037, Fisher’s exact test). Interestingly, two of those clones were essentially depleted of the VH–DH intergenic fragment (Fig. 5a), showing that these populations are mostly composed of cells that also have the silenced allele in the VHDJH configuration. This observation suggests that the extreme bias in this subset of clones results from a rearrangement occurring early on in the culture, that supposedly is non-productive and permanently silences the allele. In the case of the populations without a VH–DH intergenic fragment, such rearrangement could be a VHDJH− or a VHDJH+ encoding a μ chain that cannot form the pre-BCR14; in the case of the populations with a sizable VH–DH intergenic fragment, such rearrangements could be DJH junctions using the reading frame 3 that frequently contains premature stop codons39. For the CLP-derived B-cell clone Xp29, which does not retain the VH–DH intergenic fragment (Fig. 5a), sequencing data support the hypothesis of a non-productive rearrangement-imposed founder effect: the VHDJH rearrangements detected are diverse for the productive VH to DJH junctions, but limited concerning both the DH to JH junctions (N=2 detected), and the VH to DJH non-productive junction (unique sequence detected, several times; Fig. 5c and Supplementary Table 3). Thus, this clone appears to have made a first or very few non-productive VH to DJH rearrangements early on in the culture, by chance in the same allele, which was followed by a number of cell divisions and then an extensive rearrangement of the second allele. Clones 13–33, Xp39, no. 5.3 and no. 4.2, which also show absolute biases (Fig. 5b) retain an intermediate amount of VH–DH intergenic fragment (Fig. 5a). Sequencing data for clone no. 5.3 (showing a stop codon in the DJH joint of one of the alleles) and no. 4.2 (with a DJH joint that lacks a highly conserved codon) also confirm the founder effects imposed by rearrangement (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Tables 4 and 5). In clones 13-2, 13–18 Yp62 and Yp4, the silent allele is mostly in the DJH configuration (Fig. 5a), which suggests that one of the alleles may have a lower probability to rearrange. Sequencing analysis of the IgMb-skewed clone 13–18 indeed shows that the IgM+ population is composed of cells that have rearranged VH to DJH only in the Ighb allele, leaving Igha in the DJH configuration (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Table 6). Interestingly, the IgM− population sequencing analysis shows VHDJH rearrangements in both alleles, with Igha rearrangements that are more frequently non-productive (seven non-productive with frequent stop codons out of eight sequences) than the Ighb ones (one non-productive out of 10 sequences). These results do not exclude that, for a few subclonal expansions, one of the alleles acquires an increased probability of rearrangement. Overall, we conclude that a minority of the CLP-derived clones with extreme skewing may have a relative bias to rearrange predominantly one of the alleles and that the majority of CLP-derived clones with extreme biases is explained by founder effects imposed by rearrangement that introduce a genetic constraint in the ability to rearrange a given allele in the precursor cells from which the IgM+ cells emerge.
Discussion
Here we provide the first conclusive evidence that the allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin receptor loci differs from X-chromosome inactivation, as no stable epigenetic mark is propagated until pro-B cells start rearranging. More importantly, we also show that the Igh alleles rearrange independently from each other in the majority of clones derived from common lymphoid precursors.
Roughly, the number of cells expressing the maternal or the paternal Igh allele is the same. Similarly, in female mammals each cell inactivates the paternal or the maternal X-chromosome with identical probability. This common feature is frequently emphasized, and it has been hypothesized that autosomal genes under monoallelic expression of one or the other allele are flanked by regions with a high density of long interspersed nuclear elements40, the same elements that play a key role in the generation and propagation of the silencing epigenetic marks along the X-chromosome41. Furthermore, it is known that the alleles replicate asynchronously in parent-of-origin imprinting42, other cases of monoallelic expression28,43 and X-linked inactivation44. In particular, antigen receptor loci were found to establish this pattern early in development, around the time X-inactivation is also established, and then proceed to maintain it28. This led to the proposal that the allele to replicate first retains its epigenetic mark as the cell divides and undergoes differentiation, so that in clonally related developing B cells, it is always the same allele that undergoes VH to DJH rearrangement first28. The analysis of haematopoietic systems resulting from a single female HSC is a direct test of this hypothesis because the HSC population is heterogeneous for the inactivated X-chromosome, and if the Igh locus carries an epigenetic mark that is transmitted to the progeny as stably as the X-chromosome marks, VH to DJH rearrangement would occur first in the same allele in all, or the vast majority, of the pro-B cells. As expected45, X-chromosome inactivation is stably transmitted during all cell divisions that occur as a HSC differentiates into a regulatory T cell; in contrast, from the status of rearrangement of the silent allele in IgMa- and IgMb-sorted populations we have found that in cells clonally related to a single HSC, either the maternal or the paternal alleles can rearrange the VH first with similar frequency, thus showing that there is no stable epigenetic mark established early in development that defines a temporal allelic hierarchy for VH to DJH rearrangement. Farago et al.46 have reported the same conclusion for the Igκ locus. In their study, multiple HSCs carrying distinguishable Igκ alleles (hCκ/mCκ) were transduced with lentiviruses (that integrate the genome of each cell in a unique manner, thus identifying its clonal progeny), and then used in bulk to reconstitute mice. This technique was instrumental in the past to establish whether cell lineages share a precursor cell47; however, we argue that it provides inconclusive results for allelic commitment. Since it is well established that 40–50% of B cells rearrange both Igκ alleles48, the progeny of each precursor cell is inevitably present in both the hCκ+ and mCκ+ populations and it follows that the pattern of lentiviral integrations in the isolated hCκ+ and mCκ+ populations is expected to be roughly the same, with or without commitment. Instead, from the in vivo clonal analysis here described based on the analysis of the status of rearrangement of the silent allele, we conclude that the parallel between the allelic exclusion of Igh and X-chromosome inactivation is misleading. It thus appears that either allele from the daughter pro-B cells of a given HSC can undergo VH to DJH first, and that asynchronous replication is not a good predictor of the fate of the alleles, in V(D)J recombination and other contexts. Indeed, it has been shown that replication timing is stable after X-inactivation but switches between alleles before the onset of the inactivation and is independent from the subsequent choice to inactivate the X-chromosome49.
The data from CLP-derived clones revealed that both Igh alleles have the potential to undergo VH to DJH first, until shortly before the onset of rearrangement. It cannot be completely excluded that the accessibility of the Igh locus in culture may differ from the in vivo conditions, particularly at the level of the initiation of the Igh locus accessibility, nuclear localization of the alleles and overall rearrangement kinetics. However, our culture conditions are consensually accepted as mimicking the B-cell development that occurs in vivo in the bone marrow34, allelic exclusion was observed in the flow cytometric profiles of the clones, in vitro experiments performed months apart in different laboratories with cytokine supernatants from different batches produced similar results and a direct comparison of rearrangement efficiencies in vitro and in vivo did not reveal statistically significant differences (Supplementary Fig. 6). Strikingly, most of the clones with an extreme bias in the expression of IgMa or IgMb could be explained as a consequence of rearrangement dead ends, that is, those that permanently prevent one allele to be productively expressed at the membrane, giving the other the chance to undergo multiple productive rearrangements within the clone. This explanation of a bias determined by a limiting number of rearranging cells is compatible with the more balanced IgMa/IgMb ratios in clones derived from HSCs and MPPs, in which rearrangement starts relatively late in the cultures, after the initial cell has expanded substantially. It also explains the slightly more pronounced IgMa/IgMb bias in Ly6d+-derived clones compared with the clones derived from the precursor Ly6d−, since the former start rearranging in culture earlier than the latter. Finally, it makes sense that, in CLP-derived clones, the allele rearrangement bias observed for the Igh alleles is not reproduced by the Igκ alleles, which typically rearrange after the substantial expansion of cells expressing the pre-BCR37,50. This last result is the only one addressing the Igκ locus in this work and does not reproduce the results presented in ref. 46. Further analysis is needed to address this issue thoroughly.
From these results, it can be concluded that the mechanism of allelic exclusion of the Igh locus differs from the one claimed for the Igκ locus46. In that study, it was proposed that stable epigenetic marks acquired around the time of lymphoid differentiation pre-determine a temporal hierarchy for rearrangement; however, the status of rearrangement of the silenced allele in the clones analysed was not reported, which limits the interpretation of the data. It is nevertheless possible that the Igh and the Igκ loci behave differently, particularly given the organization of the VH and JH elements that allows successive rearrangements in the Igκ alleles and the existence of DH elements in the Igh locus. Indeed, the Igh locus has more structural similarities with the Tcrβ locus than with the Igκ locus, namely the ordered rearrangement. Of note, the Tcrβ alleles were found to independently associate with pericentromeric heterochromatin51, an interaction that inhibits rearrangement, and this observation is compatible with our conclusions for the Igh locus. Furthermore, this model is also the simplest explanation. Unlike the ‘pre-determination’ model, in which the strict temporal hierarchy for recombination implies an ad hoc mechanism to render the second allele active for recombination, in the model of independent recruitment the second rearrangement will eventually occur unless the first rearrangement triggers the feedback mechanism that shuts down recombination or the cell dies. The idea of independent recruitment is also compatible with the existence of a proportion of cells with ‘synchronous’ rearrangements, that is, cells in which the second VH to DJH rearrangement occurs in the time window before the feedback mechanism triggered by the formation of the pre-BCR blocks further rearrangement of the Igh locus (Supplementary Fig. 7). It is not known what proportion of cells rearrange the alleles ‘synchronously’. However, in the absence of complementary feedback mechanisms mediated by ATM3 and the μ chain messenger RNA17, which respond to the first rearrangement faster than the feedback triggered by the pre-BCR, there is a measurable, although small, increase in the frequency of allelically included cells. We have confirmed this increase in genomic allelic inclusion for Atm−/− cells in our assay (Fig. 2c). Finally, this model of independent rearrangement is not incompatible with the existence of moderate and transient allelic biases in the probability to undergo VH to DJH rearrangement, if each allele behaves independently from the other while becoming accessible to rearrangement, but not from its previous copy in the mother cell. Thus, the simplest interpretation of our data is that in the vast majority of clones the two alleles gain recombination competence in a sufficiently synchronized way for the V(D)J mechanism to reveal its stochastic component. Any case of an initial asymmetry that may persist for a number of divisions and lead to biases in the recombination does not contradict the model. Indeed, we may have identified such possible bias in only one of the clones studied, and these rare cases are expected from a truly independent opening of the alleles (Supplementary Fig. 7).
For over three decades, the explanations of allelic exclusion have essentially differed on the weight given to the stochastic and the regulated events. Using in vivo and in vitro clonal approaches that are based on the outcome of the rearrangement process in genetically unmanipulated murine cells, we found that an independent recruitment of the Igh alleles underlies the mechanism of allelic exclusion of the Igh locus. This intrinsic stochastic feature establishes the default mechanism that ensures two rearrangement attempts per cell, unless the first rearrangement triggers the definitive feedback that shuts down further rearrangement.
Methods
Mice
All mice were bred and maintained at the specific pathogen-free animal facilities of the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (Oeiras, Portugal). BALB/c, C57BL/6J, B6.Rag2−/−, B6.SJL-Ptprca (the pan-leukocytic marker gene Ptprca is also known as CD 45.1 or Ly 5.1; the C57BL/6J strain carries the Ptprcb allele, also known as CD 45.2 or Ly5.2) and B6.Cg-Igha were originally received from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Mice with Foxp3gfp knock-in31 (B6.Foxp3gfp, courtesy of Dr Alexander Rudensky—Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA) were backcrossed with the C57BL/6J strain at our animal facility. Animals were bred to generate female heterozygous B6.Cg-CD45.1/45.2Igha/bFoxp3gfp/wt and used in cell transfer experiments. Female 8–12 week-old-mice were used as donors. For the in vitro cell culture system (BALB/c x C57BL/6J)F1, B6.Cg-Igha/b or B6;129.Igha/bIgkh/m mice heterozygous for the Igh and/or the Igκ loci were used (B6;129.Igκh mice52 were courtesy of Dr Michel Nussenzweig (Rockefeller University, NY, USA). Mice with a targeted deletion for the immunoglobulin heavy chain joining region (B6.Igh-Jht−/− mice33) were courtesy of Dr Jocelyne Demengeot—IGC, Oeiras, Portugal) or ATM knockout mice (B6;129.Atm−/− mice53, courtesy of Dr Almudena Ramiro—CNIO, Madrid, Spain). This research project was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, and by the Portuguese National Entity that regulates the use of laboratory animals (Direcção Geral de Alimentação e Veterinária. All experiments conducted on animals followed the Portuguese (Decreto-Lei n° 113/2013) and European (Directive 2010/63/EU) legislations concerning housing, husbandry and animal welfare.
Cell suspensions
All cells were suspended in Hanks’ balanced-salt solution (HBSS, Gibco) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies). BMs were flushed and single-cell-suspended from the femora and tibiae with a 26-gauge needle of 1-ml syringe, filtered and rinsed with HBSS 5% FBS. Thymi, spleens and lymph nodes were dissected and single-cell suspensions obtained using a 70-μm nylon mesh. Blood was collected from the facial vein in EDTA. Erythrocytes from blood and spleen samples were lysed using an NH4Cl hypotonic solution at a 9:1 NH4Cl:cell suspension ratio (no. 07850, STEMCELL Technologies), for 10 min and immediately rinsed at least twice and resuspended in HBSS with 5% FBS.
SP staining
BM cell suspensions were incubated with the FcBlock reagent (anti-CD16/32, in Rat serum—no. 13551, STEMCELL Technologies), labelled with the biotinylated antibodies anti-CD45R/B220, anti-CD19, anti-CD11b/Mac-1, anti-Ly6G/GR-1, anti-pan-NK, anti-Ly-76/TER and anti-CD3 (full list of antibodies and dyes in Supplementary Table 1), and incubated with Streptavidin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec), for negative selection of lineage-positive cells by immunomagnetic separation using a MACS column (Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were further incubated in serum-free media (StemSpam SFEM, no. 09650, StemCell Technologies) with 20 μg ml−1 Rhodamine 123 (no. R302, Invitrogen) for 30 min in a water bath at 37 °C (in the dark), cooled, rinsed with HBSS, 5% FBS and then stained with Hoechst 33342 (no. H3570, Invitrogen) at a concentration of 2.5 μg ml−1 diluted in the serum-free media as before, for 90 min at 37 °C, in the dark. Cells were then labelled in HBSS with 5% FBS for 30 min on ice, with Streptavidin-APC and anti-CD45-PE and 1 μg ml−1 Propidium Iodide (no. P3566, Invitrogen). For the long-term reconstituting SP cells gating adjustment, an aliquot of the sample was incubated with 25 mg ml−1 of Verapamil (no. 676777, Calbiochem) before staining with the dyes. Further stainings with different HSC-specific marker combinations were tested, confirming the enrichment of HSCs within the SP gates.
Cell sorting and in vivo single-cell repopulation assay
Single Lin−Rho−CD45intHoe− long-term reconstituting SP cells of adult female mice in the C57BL/6J background, heterozygous for CD 45.1/45.2, Foxp3gfp/x and Igha/b, stained as above described, were sorted using the single-cell deposition unit of a MoFlo (Beckman Coulter) or FACSAria (Becton Dickinson) fluorescence-activated cell sorter machine into the individual wells of Terasaki plates (no. 452256, MicroWell 60-well MiniTray, Nunc Brand, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) preloaded with 15 μl of serum-free media (StemSpam SFEM, StemCell Technologies). Sorted IgMa and IgMb populations had purities above 95% (for most samples the purity was assessed with flow cytometry immediately after the sorting and for a few samples the purity was assessed with flow cytometry and/or semiquantitative PCR analysis of an allele-specific polymorphism in the VH–D intergenic region). To check for the purity of the single-cell sorting used in the in vivo experiments, each well was examined in a 4 °C room using an inverted microscope and the wells containing single cells were used in reconstitutions (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Eight- to twelve-week-old recipient females of the B6.Rag2−/− background received sublethal whole-body γ-irradiation with 600 cGy (Gammacell 2000 Mølsgaard Medical), 4–8 h before an intravenous retro-orbital injection with one or more test cells, as indicated. Recipient animals were analysed routinely every 2 weeks for up to 10 weeks post reconstitution for the presence of chimeric cells in the peripheral blood by staining with anti-CD45.1 and anti-CD45.2 antibodies (Supplementary Table 1). Clonally repopulated animals were killed and cells from BM, spleen, thymus and lymph nodes (LNs) were analysed for the presence of terminally differentiated B cells, T cells and myeloid cells of donor origin, as well as progenitor donor cells (antibodies used are described in Supplementary Table 1). Animals selected for subsequent analysis showed in Tregs Foxp3gfp knock-in gene expression from a single X-chromosome. Splenic CD19+IgMa+ and IgMb+ cells were then sorted on a FACSAria instrument, their DNA extracted and the recombination status of the Igh gene was analysed as described below.
All flow cytometric data collection was performed on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson), a FACSAria (Becton Dickinson) or a CyAN ADP (Dako Cytomation, Beckman Coulter). The analysis was performed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).
In vitro B-cell clonal differentiation from precursors
BM cell suspensions enriched for haematopoietic progenitors (Lin−) were treated as described in ref. 34. Briefly, HSC, MPP and CLP cells were sorted using a FACSAria instrument after staining with anti-CD117(c-Kit), anti-Ly6A/E(Sca-1), anti-CD127(IL7Ralpha) and anti-CD135(FLK2; Supplementary Table 1). Single cells were directly sorted into flat-bottom 96-well plates (Techno Plastic Products) previously seeded with non-irradiated 2.5 × 103 OP-9 cells per well, in complete culture media (OPTI-MEM, Invitrogen), supplemented with 10% FBS (Life Technologies) penicillin (50 U ml−1), streptomycin (50 μg ml−1), β-mercaptoethanol (50 μM) and Gentamycin (50 μg ml−1) and cultured in saturating amounts of the following cytokines: interleukin-7 (IL-7), c-Kit ligand and Flt3 ligand. Supernatants of myeloma cell lines transfected with the DNA encoding the above-mentioned cytokines were kindly provided by Dr Ana Cumano, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
After 12–14, 17–20 or 34 days of culture of CLPs, MPPs or HSCs, respectively, individual plates were analysed for single colonies. Wells with single colonies were stained with anti-CD19, anti-IgMa and anti-IgMb (Supplementary Table 1) analysed with flow cytometry and each IgM+ allelic fraction (and in some cases also the IgM− fraction) was sorted in bulk using a FACSAria cell sorter instrument as described above.
DNA samples
Genomic DNA (gDNA) from in vivo-differentiated clonal CD19+IgMa and CD19+IgMb pools of at least 104 sorted cells was isolated by proteinase K (Sigma) digestion, phenol–chloroform-extracted, precipitated by ethanol and resuspended in TE buffer. The set of in vitro-differentiated sorted samples included also CD19+IgM− populations and the numbers of sorted cells were invariably smaller than those of the ex vivo samples (at least 2,000 cells); for these in vitro-derived samples, gDNA was obtained by incubation with cell digestion medium containing 400 ng μl−1 proteinase K and 17 μM sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, Sigma) in PBS (Invitrogen) for 1 h at 50 °C, followed by enzyme heat inactivation for 30 min at 95 °C. gDNA thus obtained was diluted to homogeneous cell-equivalents per μl, as determined by the number of cells sorted, and used directly in PCR reactions, as described below. Treatment of control samples was matched to that of each set of samples. As controls for in vivo-differentiated clones, ex vivo splenocytes of (C57BL/6*BALB/c)F1 WT animals and mice of the Rag2−/−, Jht−/−, Jht+/− and Atm−/− genotype were sorted and treated as the test samples. qDNA from the cells lines 18–81 and PD31 (cell lines kindly provided by Dr Michele Goodhardt, Institut Universitaire d’Hématologie, Paris, France and Dr Patricia Cortes, Icahn Medical Institute, New York, USA) were used as negative controls for the presence of VH–DH intergenic fragment.
Real-time quantitative PCR
The frequency of DJH only rearranged alleles in the IgMa and IgMb populations of the same B-cell clones was determined with real-time qPCR, with the test and reference sequences localized in the recombining and non-recombining regions of the Igh locus, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2a. The test primer pairs, VDi4FW_5′-GCAGGAAGACCACAGGAGC-3′ and VDi4RE_5′-AGCCACTGTAGATGAGGGGT-3′, amplify a ~100-bp fragment herein termed ‘VH–D intergenic fragment’ downstream of the last VH-gene segment of the Igh locus and upstream of the first DH-gene segment. The reference primer pairs, CmuFW_5′-GTTCTGTGCCTCCGTCTAGC-3′ and CmuRE_5′-CTTGGGGTGACTGAGCATTTGC-3′, also amplify a ~100-bp fragment located in the μ-constant region of the Igh locus (Cμ). Each primer pair was included in a different reaction mixture and runs were performed in triplicates or quadruplicates using the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), in 384-well plates with optical tape sealers (Applied Biosystems). Reactions were performed in 10 μl final volume containing 1 × the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and 0.2 μM of each primer. Thermocycling conditions were 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s. The melting curve of the finished PCR reaction was systematically used to confirm that a single amplicon was amplified.
Calibration curves were performed using six standard dilutions, in triplicates, of B6.Jht+/− gDNA from ex vivo-sorted IgM+ cells, ranging from 17 cell equivalents up to 54,240 cell equivalents per reaction (Supplementary Fig. 2b), and test sample concentrations used per run ranged from 200 to 700 cell equivalents per run. No template control reactions were performed using water or a diluted digestion medium solution without template. Beyond replicas, independent repetition of each sample quantification was performed whenever the sample amount was sufficient, in diverse dilutions, but given the low amount of DNA in the majority of samples it was not possible to repeat the PCR on a different day. The SDS software v.2.2 (Applied Biosystems) was used to calculate the quantification cycle (Cq) value. Real-time quantification data were averaged between replicates and relative amount of DNA was calculated with the Cμ constant fragment quantification as the reference, using the delta Cq method adjusted for PCR efficiency54.
Igh rearrangement PCR and sequencing
For the amplification of DJH and VHDJH rearrangements, we used the primer collection and the two-step nested PCR conditions previously described18. One thousand cell-equivalents per run were used for the first round multiplex PCR of VHDJH-rearrangement amplifications in a 100-μl final master mix volume. For the nested round of PCR, alternative reverse primers were JH1-, JH2- and JH3-specific (JH1A—5′-TGTGGCAGATGGCCTGACATGGGG-3′, JH2A-5′-TCAGCCAGGGCTCCCAATGACCC-3′, and JH3A-5′-CAGCAGGCAGAGAGTCCCTGACCC-3′), allowing allotype discrimination upon sequencing (Supplementary Fig. 3). For sequencing, PCR bands were cloned in the pGEM-T Easy VECTOR SYSTEM (Promega) and a number of clones were analysed. Typically, four clones were sequenced per band. Given both the high number of PCR cycles used and the cloning step before sequencing the VHDJH amplicons, it was necessary to evaluate the impact in the analysis of PCR/sequencing-introduced errors. This was estimated using the formula (fmut × pstop+findel−fmut × fstop × findel) × L/1,000, where fmut and findel stand for the number of PCR/sequencing-introduced point mutations (2.6) and the number of PCR/sequencing-introduced gaps/insertions (0.18) per 1,000 nucleotides, respectively, estimated from alignments of the germline regions (a total of 16,020 bp) downstream of the JH elements that we have sequenced, pstop is the probability of producing a stop codon from a PCR-introduced point mutation (0.071) taking in consideration the codon usage of the VHDJH sequences obtained in this study and L is the average size of the amplicons. If the entire VH and CDR3 regions (L=269 bp) of the amplicon are considered, the percentage of productive VHDJH rearrangements that become non-productive because of PCR errors is 8.9%. This percentage decreases to 2.0% if only a sequence region including the entire CDR3 is used (L=60 bp), which is feasible since the PCR errors in the VH region can be aligned with the known VH germline sequences from antigen receptor databases. In any case, the errors introduced by PCR do not affect our conclusions.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Pereira, C. F. A. et al. Independent recruitment of Igh alleles in V(D)J recombination. Nat. Commun. 5:5623 doi: 10.1038/ncomms6623 (2014).
References
Cebra, J. J., Colberg, J. E. & Dray, S. Rabbit lymphoid cells differentiated with respect to alpha-, gamma-, and mu- heavy polypeptide chains and to allotypic markers Aa1 and Aa2. J. Exp. Med. 123, 547–558 (1966).
Burnet, F. M. A modification of Jerne's theory of antibody production using the concept of clonal selection. Aust. J. Sci. 20, 67–68 (1957).
Hewitt, S. L. et al. RAG-1 and ATM coordinate monoallelic recombination and nuclear positioning of immunoglobulin loci. Nat. Immunol. 10, 655–664 (2009).
Tonegawa, S. Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302, 575–581 (1983).
Coleclough, C., Perry, R. P., Karjalainen, K. & Weigert, M. Aberrant rearrangements contribute significantly to the allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin gene expression. Nature 290, 372–378 (1981).
Barreto, V. & Cumano, A. Frequency and characterization of phenotypic Ig heavy chain allelically included IgM-expressing B cells in mice. J. Immunol. 164, 893–899 (2000).
Alt, F. W. et al. Ordered rearrangement of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region segments. EMBO J. 3, 1209–1219 (1984).
Selimyan, R. et al. Localized DNA demethylation at recombination intermediates during immunoglobulin heavy chain gene assembly. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001475–e1001475 (2013).
Rose, S. M. S., Kuehl, W. M. W. & Smith, G. P. G. Cloned MPC 11 myeloma cells express two kappa genes: a gene for a complete light chain and a gene for a constant region polypeptide. Cell 12, 453–462 (1977).
Alt, F. F., Rosenberg, N. N., Lewis, S. S., Thomas, E. E. & Baltimore, D. D. Organization and reorganization of immunoglobulin genes in A-MULV-transformed cells: rearrangement of heavy but not light chain genes. Cell 27, 381–390 (1981).
Weaver, D., Costantini, F., Imanishi-Kari, T. & Baltimore, D. A transgenic immunoglobulin mu gene prevents rearrangement of endogenous genes. Cell 42, 117–127 (1985).
Nussenzweig, M. C. et al. Allelic exclusion in transgenic mice that express the membrane form of immunoglobulin mu. Science 236, 816–819 (1987).
Kitamura, D. & Rajewsky, K. Targeted disruption of mu chain membrane exon causes loss of heavy-chain allelic exclusion. Nature 356, 154–156 (1992).
Boekel, E. T., Melchers, F. & Rolink, A. G. Precursor B cells showing H chain allelic inclusion display allelic exclusion at the level of pre-B cell receptor surface expression. Immunity 8, 199–207 (1998).
Löffert, D., Ehlich, A., Muller, W. & Rajewsky, K. Surrogate light chain expression is required to establish immunoglobulin heavy chain allelic exclusion during early B cell development. Immunity 4, 133–144 (1996).
Hauser, J., Grundström, C. & Grundström, T. Allelic exclusion of IgH through inhibition of E2A in a VDJ recombination complex. J. Immunol. 192, 2460–2470 (2014).
Lutz, J. et al. Pro-B cells sense productive immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangement irrespective of polypeptide production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10644–10649 (2011).
Ehlich, A., Martin, V., Muller, W. & Rajewsky, K. Analysis of the B-cell progenitor compartment at the level of single cells. Curr. Biol. 4, 573–583 (1994).
Kosak, S. T. et al. Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science 296, 158–162 (2002).
Sayegh, C. E., Sayegh, C., Jhunjhunwala, S., Riblet, R. & Murre, C. Visualization of looping involving the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus in developing B cells. Genes Dev. 19, 322–327 (2005).
Roldán, E. et al. Locus ‘decontraction’ and centromeric recruitment contribute to allelic exclusion of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene. Nat. Immunol. 6, 31–41 (2005).
Guo, C. C. et al. CTCF-binding elements mediate control of V(D)J recombination. Nature 477, 424–430 (2011).
Fuxa, M. et al. Pax5 induces V-to-DJ rearrangements and locus contraction of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene. Genes Dev. 18, 411–422 (2004).
Skok, J. A. et al. Nonequivalent nuclear location of immunoglobulin alleles in B lymphocytes. Nat. Immunol. 2, 848–854 (2001).
Holwerda, S. J. B. et al. Allelic exclusion of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus is independent of its nuclear localization in mature B cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 6905–6916 (2013).
Chess, A. Random and non-random monoallelic expression. Neuropsychopharmacology 38, 55–61 (2012).
Singh, N. et al. Coordination of the random asynchronous replication of autosomal loci. Nat. Genet. 33, 339–341 (2003).
Mostoslavsky, R. et al. Asynchronous replication and allelic exclusion in the immune system. Nature 414, 221–225 (2001).
Pereira, J. P., Girard, R., Chaby, R., Cumano, A. & Vieira, P. Monoallelic expression of the murine gene encoding Toll-like receptor 4. Nat. Immunol. 4, 464–470 (2003).
Osawa, M., Hanada, K., Hamada, H. & Nakauchi, H. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science 273, 242–245 (1996).
Fontenot, J. D. et al. Regulatory T cell lineage specification by the forkhead transcription factor foxp3. Immunity 22, 329–341 (2005).
Vettermann, C. & Schlissel, M. S. Allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin genes: models and mechanisms. Immunol. Rev. 237, 22–42 (2010).
Gu, H. H., Zou, Y. R. Y. & Rajewsky, K. K. Independent control of immunoglobulin switch recombination at individual switch regions evidenced through Cre-loxP-mediated gene targeting. Cell 73, 1155–1164 (1993).
Vieira, P. & Cumano, A. Differentiation of B lymphocytes from hematopoietic stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 271, 67–76 (2004).
Inlay, M. A. et al. Ly6d marks the earliest stage of B-cell specification and identifies the branchpoint between B-cell and T-cell development. Genes Dev. 23, 2376–2381 (2009).
Decker, D. J., Boyle, N. E., Koziol, J. A. & Klinman, N. R. The expression of the Ig H chain repertoire in developing bone marrow B lineage cells. J. Immunol. 146, 350–361 (1991).
Hess, J. et al. Induction of pre-B cell proliferation after de novo synthesis of the pre-B cell receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1745–1750 (2001).
Wang, Y.-H. et al. V(D)J recombinatorial repertoire diversification during intraclonal pro-B to B-cell differentiation. Blood 101, 1030–1037 (2003).
Gu, H., Kitamura, D. & Rajewsky, K. B cell development regulated by gene rearrangement: arrest of maturation by membrane-bound Dμ protein and selection of DHelement reading frames. Cell 65, 47–54 (1991).
Allen, E. et al. High concentrations of long interspersed nuclear element sequence distinguish monoallelically expressed genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9940–9945 (2003).
Chow, J. C. et al. LINE-1 activity in facultative heterochromatin formation during X chromosome inactivation. Cell 141, 956–969 (2010).
Kitsberg, D. et al. Allele-specific replication timing of imprinted gene regions. Nature 364, 459–463 (1993).
Chess, A., Simon, I., Cedar, H. & Axel, R. Allelic inactivation regulates olfactory receptor gene expression. Cell 78, 823–834 (1994).
Takagi, N. Differentiation of X chromosomes in early female mouse embryos. Exp. Cell Res. 86, 127–135 (1974).
Lebon, J. M., Tam, P. P., Singer-Sam, J., Riggs, A. D. & Tan, S. S. Mouse endogenous X-linked genes do not show lineage-specific delayed inactivation during development. Genet. Res. 65, 223–227 (1995).
Farago, M. et al. Clonal allelic predetermination of immunoglobulin-κ rearrangement. Nature 490, 561–565 (2012).
Keller, G., Paige, C., Gilboa, E. & Wagner, E. F. Expression of a foreign gene in myeloid and lymphoid cells derived from multipotent haematopoietic precursors. Nature 318, 149–154 (1985).
Mostoslavsky, R. & Alt, F. W. The lingering enigma of the allelic exclusion mechanism. Cell 118, 539–544 (2004).
Gribnau, J. X chromosome choice occurs independently of asynchronous replication timing. J. Cell Biol. 168, 365–373 (2005).
Yamagami, T., Boekel, ten, E., Andersson, J., Rolink, A. & Melchers, F. Frequencies of multiple IgL chain gene rearrangements in single normal or kappaL chain-deficient B lineage cells. Immunity 11, 317–327 (1999).
Schlimgen, R. J., Reddy, K. L., Singh, H. & Krangel, M. S. Initiation of allelic exclusion by stochastic interaction of Tcrb alleles with repressive nuclear compartments. Nat. Immunol. 9, 802–809 (2008).
Casellas, R. R. et al. Contribution of receptor editing to the antibody repertoire. Science 291, 1541–1544 (2001).
Elson, A. et al. Pleiotropic defects in ataxia-telangiectasia protein-deficient mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13084–13089 (1996).
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).
Hesse, J. E., Lieber, M. R., Gellert, M. & Mizuuchi, K. Extrachromosomal DNA substrates in pre-B cells undergo inversion or deletion at immunoglobulin V-(D)-J joining signals. Cell 49, 775–783 (1987).
Alamyar, E., Duroux, P., Lefranc, M. P. & Giudicelli, V. IMGT(®) tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. Methods Mol. Biol. 882, 569–604 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We thank Marie Bonnet, Thiago Carvalho, Ana Cumano, Revati Masilamani, Gillian Wu and all the members of our laboratory for the critical reading of the manuscript. C.F.A.P. is supported by an FCT fellowship (SFRH/BD/33217/2007). This work was supported by an FCT grant (PTDC/BIA-BCM/108020/2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.F.A.P. and V.M.B. designed the experiments, analysed the data, discussed the results and wrote the manuscript. C.F.A.P. performed all the experiments. R.de.F and F.M. provided technical assistance. T.L. and R.G. gave support concerning flow cytometry. P.V. advised and gave support to all experiments. V.M.B. supervised all the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-7, Supplementary Tables 1-6 and Supplementary References. (PDF 1769 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Alves-Pereira, C., de Freitas, R., Lopes, T. et al. Independent recruitment of Igh alleles in V(D)J recombination. Nat Commun 5, 5623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6623
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6623
This article is cited by
-
Chromosome choice for initiation of V–(D)–J recombination is not governed by genomic imprinting
Immunology & Cell Biology (2017)
-
Programming asynchronous replication in stem cells
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2017)
-
Modification of single molecule fluorescence using external fields
Frontiers of Physics (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.