Editorials in 2013

Filter By:

Article Type
Year
  • For the past six months Nature Climate Change has been offering authors the option of double-blind peer review. Here we report on some preliminary findings from the trial.

    Editorial
  • Limited progress was made in Warsaw towards a universal agreement on action over climate change.

    Editorial
  • Keeping politicians and the public informed about advances in climate science would benefit from the active participation of social scientists in the process.

    Editorial
  • Dealing with the impacts of climate change is better than suffering their full extent — even if it's not the best possible outcome — but to what extent are we doing so?

    Editorial
  • A well-organized global grassroots campaign for climate protection could eclipse the IPCC in political influence.

    Editorial
  • Lessons from addiction may help to transform our high-carbon lifestyle.

    Editorial
  • The effect of climate change on precipitation and flooding is of global concern.

    Editorial
  • A report that assesses a decade of extreme events provokes thoughts on weather, climate change and what is to come.

    Editorial
  • As the journal's first impact factor is released, it is time to reflect on journal metrics and how Nature Climate Change has been making its mark.

    Editorial
  • Countries met again at a new climate change meeting, but this time to work out solutions.

    Editorial
  • Many believe that double-blind peer review reduces referee bias, real or perceived.

    Editorial
  • Although a policy consensus regarding shale gas is emerging in the United States, arguments about fracking continue unabated in Europe.

    Editorial
  • People's acceptance of global warming can be influenced by many filters.

    Editorial
  • There are many barriers that must be overcome if South Africa is to control its greenhouse-gas emissions.

    Editorial
  • The success of Nature Climate Change in attracting an increasing number of high-quality submissions necessarily means that editorial criteria for publication are becoming steadily more demanding.

    Editorial
  • California's newly inaugurated carbon-trading scheme should contribute to a cleaner, greener future.

    Editorial