Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements and Focuses
Image gallery
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
UCSD-Nature Signaling Gateway
The Cell Migration Gateway
Nature Reports Stem Cells
Nature Reports Avian Flu
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Letter
Nature Cell Biology 8, 78 - 83 (2005)
Published online: 4 December 2005; | doi:10.1038/ncb1341

The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores

Benjamin A. Pinsky1, Charles Kung2, Kevan M. Shokat2, 3 & Sue Biggins1

1  Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

2  Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Box 2280, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

3  Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Correspondence should be addressed to Sue Biggins sbiggins@fhcrc.org

The spindle checkpoint ensures accurate chromosome segregation by delaying cell-cycle progression until all sister kinetochores capture microtubules from opposite poles and come under tension (for reviews, see refs 1, 2). Although the checkpoint is activated by either the lack of kinetochore-microtubule attachments or defects in the tension exerted by microtubule-generated forces, it is not clear whether these signals are linked. We investigated the connection between tension and attachment by studying the conserved budding yeast Ipl1Aurora protein kinase that is required for checkpoint activation in the absence of tension but not attachment3. Here, we show that spindle-checkpoint activation in kinetochore mutants that seem to have unattached kinetochores depends on Ipl1 activity. When Ipl1 function was impaired in these kinetochore mutants, the attachments were restored and the checkpoint was turned off. These data indicate that Ipl1 activates the checkpoint in response to tension defects by creating unattached kinetochores. Moreover, although the Dam1 kinetochore complex has been implicated as a key downstream target, we found the existence of unidentified Ipl1 sites on Dam1 or additional important substrates that regulate both microtuble detachment and the checkpoint.


MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 10 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 10 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Figures & Tables
Supplementary info
Export citation

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Cell Biology
ISSN: 1465-7392
EISSN: 1476-4679
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | For authors | Online submission | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | Reprints and permissions | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy