Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Ecological risk assessment for Bt crops

Nature Biotechnology volume 24, pages 749–751 (2006)Cite this article

A Correspondence to this article was published on 01 July 2006

To the editor:

In their Perspective on commercialized Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin transgenic crops and biological control in the January issue (Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 63–71, 2006), Jörg Romeis et al. draws some conclusions that do not fully and accurately represent the published data, and more importantly make several recommendations for ecological risk assessment (ERA) that are unduly narrow and restrictive. In this letter, we focus on the role of laboratory studies in ERA and discuss the significance of the limitations in their perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Tritrophic interaction showing Bt plant, herbivore and natural enemy, illustrating the first part of risk hypotheses useful for ERA.

References

  1. Romeis, J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 63–71 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crickmore, N. et al. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature. http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/ (accessed 30 Nov, 2005).

  3. Haider, M.Z. Eur. J. Biochem. 156, 531–540 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Omolo, E.O. et al. Curr. Microb. 34, 118–121 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lövei, G.L. & Arpaia, S. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 114, 1–14 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hilbeck, A. et al. Environ. Entomol. 27, 1255–1263 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Romeis et al. J. Insect Physiol. 50, 175–184 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodrigo-Simón et al. Appl. Env. Microb. 72, 1595–1603 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Maagd et al. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 409–433 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Fed. Register 63, 26846–26924 (1998)

  11. European Food Safety Agency. Eur. Fed. Safety Agency J. 99, 1–94 (2004).

  12. Hilbeck, A. et al. Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms: Methodologies for Assessing Bt cotton in Brazil (CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2006).

  13. Andow, D.A. & Hilbeck, A. BioSci. 54, 637–649 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Birch, A.N.E. et al. in Environmental Risk Assessment of Transgenic Organisms: A Case Study of Bt Maize in Kenya (Hilbeck, A. & Andow, D.A., eds). 117–185 (CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andow, D.A. & Zwahlen, C. Ecol. Lett. 9, 196–214 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, P.Y. et al. Crop Prot. 24, 229–239 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pemsl, D. et al. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 3, 44–56 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. North American Free Trade Alliance-Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Maize & Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico (Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Montreal, Canada, 2004)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology and Center for Community Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 55108, Minnesota, USA

    David A. Andow

  2. Department of Integrated Pest Management, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Flakkebjerg Research Centre, Slagelse, DK-4200, Denmark

    Gábor L. Lövei

  3. ENEA National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment, Research Centre Trisaia, Rotondella, I-75026, Italy

    Salvatore Arpaia

Authors
  1. David A. Andow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gábor L. Lövei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salvatore Arpaia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andow, D., Lövei, G. & Arpaia, S. Ecological risk assessment for Bt crops. Nat Biotechnol 24, 749–751 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0706-749

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0706-749

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing