Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focuses
Conferences
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Bioentrepreneur
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Nature
Nature Medicine
Nature Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Methods
Nature Chemical Biology
news@nature.com
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Nature Conferences
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Review
Nature Biotechnology 24, 167 - 175 (2006)
Published online: 7 February 2006; | doi:10.1038/nbt1186

Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis

Nathalie Malo1, 2, James A Hanley2, Sonia Cerquozzi1, Jerry Pelletier3 & Robert Nadon1, 4

1  McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, 740 avenue du Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A4.

2  McGill University Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A4.

3  McGill University Department of Biochemistry, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A4.

4  McGill University Department of Human Genetics, 1205 avenue du Docteur Penfield N5/13, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1B1.

Correspondence should be addressed to Robert Nadon robert.nadon@mcgill.ca

High-throughput screening is an early critical step in drug discovery. Its aim is to screen a large number of diverse chemical compounds to identify candidate 'hits' rapidly and accurately. Few statistical tools are currently available, however, to detect quality hits with a high degree of confidence. We examine statistical aspects of data preprocessing and hit identification for primary screens. We focus on concerns related to positional effects of wells within plates, choice of hit threshold and the importance of minimizing false-positive and false-negative rates. We argue that replicate measurements are needed to verify assumptions of current methods and to suggest data analysis strategies when assumptions are not met. The integration of replicates with robust statistical methods in primary screens will facilitate the discovery of reliable hits, ultimately improving the sensitivity and specificity of the screening process.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

 Top
Abstract
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Full textFull text
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
Order commercial reprintsOrder commercial reprints
CrossRef lists 23 articles citing this articleCrossRef lists 23 articles citing this article
Save this linkSave this link
Figures & Tables
Export citation

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
Nature Biotechnology
ISSN: 1087-0156
EISSN: 1546-1696
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | Focuses | Conferences | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy