Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Past versus present: the importance of tense in patent application examples

The Federal Circuit questions an example's validity in Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Promega.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Promega, 323 F.3d 1354 (CAFC, 2003).

  2. Described in 37 CFR § 1.71.

  3. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure §; 608.01(p)(II), August 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potter, J., Talukder, G. Past versus present: the importance of tense in patent application examples. Nat Biotechnol 21, 1397–1398 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1103-1397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1103-1397

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing