Habenular α5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
471,
Pages:
597–601
Date published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature09797
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

Genetic variation in CHRNA5, the gene encoding the α5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit, increases vulnerability to tobacco addiction and lung cancer, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Here we report markedly increased nicotine intake in mice with a null mutation in Chrna5. This effect was ‘rescued’ in knockout mice by re-expressing α5 subunits in the medial habenula (MHb), and recapitulated in rats through α5 subunit knockdown in MHb. Remarkably, α5 subunit knockdown in MHb did not alter the rewarding effects of nicotine but abolished the inhibitory effects of higher nicotine doses on brain reward systems. The MHb extends projections almost exclusively to the interpeduncular nucleus (IPN). We found diminished IPN activation in response to nicotine in α5 knockout mice. Further, disruption of IPN signalling increased nicotine intake in rats. Our findings indicate that nicotine activates the habenulo-interpeduncular pathway through α5-containing nAChRs, triggering an inhibitory motivational signal that acts to limit nicotine intake.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Increased nicotine intake in [agr]5* knockout mice.
    Figure 1: Increased nicotine intake in α5* knockout mice.

    a, Data are presented as mean (± s.e.m.) number of nicotine infusions earned across a range of nicotine doses. Two-way ANOVA: genotype, F(1,91) = 28.57, P<0.0001; dose, F(6,91) = 13.69, P<0.0001; interaction, F(6,75) = 2.55, P<0.05; n = 10–11 per group. b, Data from a are presented as mean (± s.e.m.) total nicotine intake at each dose. Genotype, F(1,91) = 67.98, P<0.0001; dose, F(6,91) = 39.06, P<0.0001; interaction, F(6,791 = 14.25, P<0.0001. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 compared with wild-type mice at the same nicotine dose.

  2. /`Rescue/' of [agr]5* nAChRs in the habenulo-interpeduncular tract normalizes nicotine intake.
    Figure 2: ‘Rescue’ of α5* nAChRs in the habenulo-interpeduncular tract normalizes nicotine intake.

    a, Mean (± s.e.m.) nicotine infusions in Lenti-Control mice. Genotype, F(1,22) = 7.70, P<0.05; dose, F(2,22) = 19.34, P<0.0001; interaction, F(2,22) = 3.75, P<0.05. **P<0.01 between genotypes. b, Mean (± s.e.m.) nicotine infusions in Lenti-CHRNA5 mice. Genotype, F(1,28) = 0.17, not significant (NS); dose, F(2,28) = 16.05, P<0.0001; interaction, F(2,28) = 0.36, NS; n = 6–9 per group. c, GFP immunostaining confirmed MHb virus delivery. Hipp, hippocampus; LHb, lateral habenula; LV, lateral ventricle; MHb, medial habenula. Scale bars, 500 μm (left), 200μm (right). d, GFP-labelled cells in MHb, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-counterstained in left panel, extend into the fasciculus retroflexus (Fr). Scale bar, 200μm. e, GFP-positive axons detected in IPN. Left panel is labelled with vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) (red) to identify the IPN. Scale bars, 50μm (left), 10μm (right).

  3. [agr]5* nAChRs in the habenulo-interpeduncular tract control nicotine intake and its reward-inhibiting effects in rats.
    Figure 3: α5* nAChRs in the habenulo-interpeduncular tract control nicotine intake and its reward-inhibiting effects in rats.

    a, Nicotine self-administration in rats injected with Lenti-Control or Lenti-α5-shRNA in the MHb. Data are presented as mean (± s.e.m.) number of nicotine infusions earned. Lentivirus, F(1,60) = 21.07, P<0.01; dose, F(6,60) = 3.84, P<0.01; interaction, F(6,60) = 1.57, NS; ; n = 5–7 per group. b, Intracranial self-stimulation thresholds in rats. Data are presented as mean (± s.e.m.) percentage change from baseline reward threshold. Lentivirus, F(1,60) = 13.23, P<0.001; dose, F(5,60) = 6.38, P<0.0001; interaction, F(5,60) = 4.19, P<0.01. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 indicate statistically significant differences between groups; n = 6–8 per group.

  4. Nicotine-induced activation of the IPN in mice.
    Figure 4: Nicotine-induced activation of the IPN in mice.

    a, Photomicrograph of IPN showing Fos immunoreactivity in wild-type (left) and α5 knockout (right) mice following saline (top), 0.5mgkg−1 nicotine (centre), or 1.5mgkg−1 nicotine (bottom); n = 5 per group. Scale bar, 100μm. b, Cell density was quantified with unbiased stereology. Data are presented as the mean (± s.e.m.) density of Fos-immunoreactive cells (number per mm3). Genotype, F(1,24) = 13.50, P<0.01; drug, F(2,24) = 21.13, P<0.0001; interaction, F(2,24) = 8.64, P<0.01. ***P<0.001 compared with saline treatment; ****P<0.001 compared with knockout mice at the same nicotine dose.

  5. Disruption of IPN or MHb signalling increases nicotine intake in rats.
    Figure 5: Disruption of IPN or MHb signalling increases nicotine intake in rats.

    ad, All data are presented as mean (± s.e.m.) number of nicotine infusions earned. a, Lidocaine infused into the IPN increased nicotine intake in rats; **P<0.01. b, Lidocaine into the MHb increased nicotine intake in rats self-administering a high unit dose (0.12mgkg−1 per infusion); *P<0.05. c, LY235959 infused into the IPN increased nicotine intake in rats (n = 9). F(3,24) = 6.08, P<0.01. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 compared to control. d, LY235959 (10ng per side) into the MHb increased nicotine intake in rats responding for a high unit dose (0.12mgkg−1 per infusion; n = 5); *P<0.05.

References

  1. Mokdad, A. H., Marks, J. S., Stroup, D. F. & Gerberding, J. L. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 291, 12381245 (2004)
  2. Stolerman, I. P. & Jarvis, M. J. The scientific case that nicotine is addictive. Psychopharmacology 117, 210 (1995)
  3. Le Novère, N., Corringer, P. J. & Changeux, J. P. The diversity of subunit composition in nAChRs: evolutionary origins, physiologic and pharmacologic consequences. J. Neurobiol. 53, 447456 (2002)
  4. Picciotto, M. R. et al. Acetylcholine receptors containing the β2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature 391, 173177 (1998)
  5. Tapper, A. R. et al. Nicotine activation of α4* receptors: sufficient for reward, tolerance, and sensitization. Science 306, 10291032 (2004)
  6. Corrigall, W. A., Franklin, K. B., Coen, K. M. & Clarke, P. B. The mesolimbic dopaminergic system is implicated in the reinforcing effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 107, 285289 (1992)
  7. Ikemoto, S., Qin, M. & Liu, Z. H. Primary reinforcing effects of nicotine are triggered from multiple regions both inside and outside the ventral tegmental area. J. Neurosci. 26, 723730 (2006)
  8. Maskos, U. et al. Nicotine reinforcement and cognition restored by targeted expression of nicotinic receptors. Nature 436, 103107 (2005)
  9. Berrettini, W. et al. α-5/α-3 nicotinic receptor subunit alleles increase risk for heavy smoking. Mol. Psychiatry 13, 368373 (2008)
  10. Saccone, S. F. et al. Cholinergic nicotinic receptor genes implicated in a nicotine dependence association study targeting 348 candidate genes with 3713 SNPs. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 3649 (2007)
  11. Liu, J. Z. et al. Meta-analysis and imputation refines the association of 15q25 with smoking quantity. Nature Genet. 42, 436440 (2010)
  12. Bierut, L. J. et al. Variants in nicotinic receptors and risk for nicotine dependence. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 11631171 (2008)
  13. Kuryatov, A., Berrettini, W. & Lindstrom, J. Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) α5 subunit variant associated with risk for nicotine dependence and lung cancer reduces (α4β2)2α5 AChR function. Mol. Pharmacol. 79, 119125 (2011)
  14. Hung, R. J. et al. A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature 452, 633637 (2008)
  15. Wang, Y., Broderick, P., Matakidou, A., Eisen, T. & Houlston, R. S. Role of 5p15.33 (TERT-CLPTM1L), 6p21.33 and 15q25.1 (CHRNA5-CHRNA3) variation and lung cancer risk in never-smokers. Carcinogenesis 31, 234238 (2010)
  16. Amos, C. I. et al. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nature Genet. 40, 616622 (2008)
  17. Le Marchand, L. et al. Smokers with the CHRNA lung cancer-associated variants are exposed to higher levels of nicotine equivalents and a carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamine. Cancer Res. 68, 91379140 (2008)
  18. Henningfield, J. E. & Goldberg, S. R. Nicotine as a reinforcer in human subjects and laboratory animals. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 19, 989992 (1983)
  19. Le Foll, B., Wertheim, C. & Goldberg, S. R. High reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in non-human primates. PLoS ONE 2, e230 (2007)
  20. Risner, M. E. & Goldberg, S. R. A comparison of nicotine and cocaine self-administration in the dog: fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules of intravenous drug infusion. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 224, 319326 (1983)
  21. Corrigall, W. A. & Coen, K. M. Nicotine maintains robust self-administration in rats on a limited-access schedule. Psychopharmacology 99, 473478 (1989)
  22. Jackson, K. J. et al. Role of α5 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in pharmacological and behavioral effects of nicotine in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 334, 137146 (2010)
  23. Matta, S. G. et al. Guidelines on nicotine dose selection for in vivo research. Psychopharmacology 190, 269319 (2007)
  24. Russell, M. A., Wilson, C., Patel, U. A., Feyerabend, C. & Cole, P. V. Plasma nicotine levels after smoking cigarettes with high, medium, and low nicotine yields. BMJ 2, 414416 (1975)
  25. Lynch, W. J. & Carroll, M. E. Regulation of drug intake. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 9, 131143 (2001)
  26. Lynch, W. J. & Carroll, M. E. Regulation of intravenously self-administered nicotine in rats. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 7, 198207 (1999)
  27. Marks, M. J. et al. Nicotine binding and nicotinic receptor subunit RNA after chronic nicotine treatment. J. Neurosci. 12, 27652784 (1992)
  28. Herkenham, M. & Nauta, W. J. Efferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 187, 1947 (1979)
  29. Grady, S. R. et al. Rodent habenulo-interpeduncular pathway expresses a large variety of uncommon nAChR subtypes, but only the α3β4* and α3β3β4* subtypes mediate acetylcholine release. J. Neurosci. 29, 22722282 (2009)
  30. London, E. D., Connolly, R. J., Szikszay, M., Wamsley, J. K. & Dam, M. Effects of nicotine on local cerebral glucose utilization in the rat. J. Neurosci. 8, 39203928 (1988)
  31. Donovick, P. J., Burright, R. G. & Zuromski, E. Localization of quinine aversion within the septum, habenula, and interpeduncular nucleus of the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 71, 376383 (1970)
  32. Salas, R., Sturm, R., Boulter, J. & De Biasi, M. Nicotinic receptors in the habenulo-interpeduncular system are necessary for nicotine withdrawal in mice. J. Neurosci. 29, 30143018 (2009)
  33. Glick, S. D., Ramirez, R. L., Livi, J. M. & Maisonneuve, I. M. 18-Methoxycoronaridine acts in the medial habenula and/or interpeduncular nucleus to decrease morphine self-administration in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 537, 9498 (2006)
  34. Matsumoto, M. & Hikosaka, O. Lateral habenula as a source of negative reward signals in dopamine neurons. Nature 447, 11111115 (2007)
  35. Brown, R. W., Collins, A. C., Lindstrom, J. M. & Whiteaker, P. Nicotinic α5 subunit deletion locally reduces high-affinity agonist activation without altering nicotinic receptor numbers. J. Neurochem. 103, 204215 (2007)
  36. Kenny, P. J. & Markou, A. Nicotine self-administration acutely activates brain reward systems and induces a long-lasting increase in reward sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 12031211 (2006)
  37. Schaefer, G. J. & Michael, R. P. Task-specific effects of nicotine in rats: intracranial self-stimulation and locomotor activity. Neuropharmacology 25, 125131 (1986)
  38. Kenny, P. J. Brain reward systems and compulsive drug use. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 28, 135141 (2007)
  39. Qin, C. & Luo, M. Neurochemical phenotypes of the afferent and efferent projections of the mouse medial habenula. Neuroscience 161, 827837 (2009)
  40. Hussain, R. J., Taraschenko, O. D. & Glick, S. D. Effects of nicotine, methamphetamine and cocaine on extracellular levels of acetylcholine in the interpeduncular nucleus of rats. Neurosci. Lett. 440, 270274 (2008)
  41. Girod, R., Barazangi, N., McGehee, D. & Role, L. W. Facilitation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neuropharmacology 39, 27152725 (2000)
  42. McGehee, D. S., Heath, M. J., Gelber, S., Devay, P. & Role, L. W. Nicotine enhancement of fast excitatory synaptic transmission in CNS by presynaptic receptors. Science 269, 16921696 (1995)
  43. Rauhut, A. S., Hawrylak, M. & Mardekian, S. K. Bupropion differentially alters the aversive, locomotor and rewarding properties of nicotine in CD-1 mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 90, 598607 (2008)
  44. Gavrilov, Y. V., Perekrest, S. V., Novikova, N. S. & Korneva, E. A. Stress-induced changes in cellular responses in hypothalamic structures to administration of an antigen (lipopolysaccharide) (in terms of c-Fos protein expression). Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 38, 189194 (2008)
  45. Laviolette, S. R., Alexson, T. O. & van der Kooy, D. Lesions of the tegmental pedunculopontine nucleus block the rewarding effects and reveal the aversive effects of nicotine in the ventral tegmental area. J. Neurosci. 22, 86538660 (2002)
  46. Kenny, P. J., Chartoff, E., Roberto, M., Carlezon, W. A., Jr & Markou, A. NMDA receptors regulate nicotine-enhanced brain reward function and intravenous nicotine self-administration: role of the ventral tegmental area and central nucleus of the amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 266281 (2009)
  47. Hong, L. E. et al. A genetically modulated, intrinsic cingulate circuit supports human nicotine addiction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1350913514 (2010)
  48. Schlaepfer, I. R. et al. The CHRNA5/A3/B4 gene cluster variability as an important determinant of early alcohol and tobacco initiation in young adults. Biol. Psychiatry 63, 10391046 (2008)
  49. Salas, R. et al. The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit α5 mediates short-term effects of nicotine in vivo. Mol. Pharmacol. 63, 10591066 (2003)
  50. Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K. B. J. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2nd edn (Academic, 2001)
  51. Paxinos, G. & Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 3rd edn (Academic, 1997)
  52. Lecourtier, L., Neijt, H. C. & Kelly, P. H. Habenula lesions cause impaired cognitive performance in rats: implications for schizophrenia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 25512560 (2004)
  53. Kornetsky, C., Esposito, R. U., McLean, S. & Jacobson, J. O. Intracranial self-stimulation thresholds: a model for the hedonic effects of drugs of abuse. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 36, 289292 (1979)
  54. Huston-Lyons, D. & Kornetsky, C. Effects of nicotine on the threshold for rewarding brain stimulation in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 41, 755759 (1992)
  55. Marks, M. J. et al. Two pharmacologically distinct components of nicotinic receptor-mediated rubidium efflux in mouse brain require the β2 subunit. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 289, 10901103 (1999)
  56. Shoaib, M. et al. The role of nicotinic receptor beta-2 subunits in nicotine discrimination and conditioned taste aversion. Neuropharmacology 42, 530539 (2002)

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Behavioral and Molecular Neuroscience, Department of Molecular Therapeutics, The Scripps Research Institute—Scripps Florida, Jupiter, Florida 33458, USA

    • Christie D. Fowler,
    • Qun Lu,
    • Paul M. Johnson &
    • Paul J. Kenny
  2. Institute of Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

    • Michael J. Marks

Contributions

C.D.F., Q.L., P.M.J. and M.J.M. performed all experiments; M.J.M. also provided essential reagents and assisted in manuscript editing; C.D.F. and P.J.K. designed the experiments, performed the statistical analyses and wrote the manuscript.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Author details

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. Supplementary Information (23.7M)

    The file contains Supplementary Figures 1-19 with legends, Supplementary Methods and additional references.

Additional data