Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 461, 636-639 (1 October 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature08395; Received 25 April 2009; Accepted 6 August 2009
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
nature jobs
John Innes Centre Project Leader in Plant or Microbial Sciences
- University of East Anglia
- Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Professor of Experimental Virology (W3)
- University Hospital Jena, Institute of Virology and Antivirale Therapy
- Jena, Germany
Remote triggering of fault-strength changes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield
Taka'aki Taira1, Paul G. Silver1,4, Fenglin Niu2 & Robert M. Nadeau3
- Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, District of Columbia 20015, USA
- Department of Earth Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
- Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
- Deceased.
Correspondence to: Taka'aki Taira1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.T. (Email: taira@dtm.ciw.edu).
Abstract
Fault strength is a fundamental property of seismogenic zones, and its temporal changes can increase or decrease the likelihood of failure and the ultimate triggering of seismic events. Although changes in fault strength have been suggested to explain various phenomena, such as the remote triggering of seismicity1, there has been no means of actually monitoring this important property in situ. Here we argue that
20 years of observation (1987–2008) of the Parkfield area at the San Andreas fault have revealed a means of monitoring fault strength. We have identified two occasions where long-term changes in fault strength have been most probably induced remotely by large seismic events, namely the 2004 magnitude (M) 9.1 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake and the earlier 1992 M = 7.3 Landers earthquake. In both cases, the change possessed two manifestations: temporal variations in the properties of seismic scatterers—probably reflecting the stress-induced migration of fluids—and systematic temporal variations in the characteristics of repeating-earthquake sequences that are most consistent with changes in fault strength. In the case of the 1992 Landers earthquake, a period of reduced strength probably triggered the 1993 Parkfield aseismic transient2, 3, 4, 5 as well as the accompanying cluster of four M > 4 earthquakes at Parkfield. The fault-strength changes produced by the distant 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake are especially important, as they suggest that the very largest earthquakes may have a global influence on the strength of the Earth's fault systems. As such a perturbation would bring many fault zones closer to failure, it should lead to temporal clustering of global seismicity. This hypothesis seems to be supported by the unusually high number of M
8 earthquakes occurring in the few years following the 2004 Sumatra–Andaman earthquake.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Earthquakes Imperfect dominoesNature Geoscience News and Views (01 Feb 2009)
Earth Science Parkfield's unfulfilled promiseNature News and Views (19 Sep 2002)
See all 10 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Migration of seismic scatterers associated with the 1993 Parkfield aseismic transient eventNature Letters to Editor (04 Dec 2003)
Shallow fault-zone dilatancy recovery after the 2003 Bam earthquake in IranNature Letters to Editor (05 Mar 2009)
See all 56 matches for Research
