Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Opinion
Nature 461, 347-348 (17 September 2009) | doi:10.1038/461347a; Published online 16 September 2009
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
nature jobs
Head of Analytical R&D
- Syngene International Limited
- Bangalore 560 099 India
University Full-Professor (W3, Tenure Track)
- University of Münster
- Munster 48149 Germany
Ocean fertilization: time to move on
Aaron Strong1, Sallie Chisholm2, Charles Miller3 & John Cullen4
Abstract
Adding iron to the ocean is not an effective way to fight climate change, and we don't need further research to establish that, say Aaron Strong, Sallie Chisholm, Charles Miller and John Cullen.
In the face of seemingly accelerating climate change, some have proposed tackling the problem with geoengineering: intentionally altering the planet's physical or biological systems to counteract global warming. One such strategy — fertilizing the oceans with iron to stimulate phytoplankton blooms, absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and export carbon to the deep sea — should be abandoned.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Biogeochemistry Iron findingsNature News and Views (26 Apr 2007)
Pumping iron in the PacificNature News and Views (24 Mar 1994)
See all 8 matches for News And Views
