Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Tunable delay of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen entanglement

Nature volume 457, pages 859–862 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Entangled systems display correlations that are stronger than can be obtained classically. This makes entanglement an essential resource for a number of applications, such as quantum information processing, quantum computing and quantum communications1,2. The ability to control the transfer of entanglement between different locations will play a key role in these quantum protocols and enable quantum networks3. Such a transfer requires a system that can delay quantum correlations without significant degradation, effectively acting as a short-term quantum memory. An important benchmark for such systems is the ability to delay Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) levels of entanglement and to be able to tune the delay. EPR entanglement is the basis for a number of quantum protocols, allowing the remote inference of the properties of one system (to better than its standard quantum limit) through measurements on the other correlated system. Here we show that a four-wave mixing process based on a double-lambda scheme in hot 85Rb vapour allows us to obtain an optically tunable delay for EPR entangled beams of light. A significant maximum delay, of the order of the width of the cross-correlation function, is achieved. The four-wave mixing also preserves the quantum spatial correlations of the entangled beams. We take advantage of this property to delay entangled images, making this the first step towards a quantum memory for images4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Experimental set-up.
Figure 2: Delay of EPR entanglement.
Figure 3: Effect of the gain in the slow light cell on the quantum correlations.
Figure 4: Delay of an entangled image of the ‘ ’ symbol.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galindo, A. & Martin-Delgado, M. A. Information and computation: Classical and quantum aspects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 347–423 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Braunstein, S. L. & van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513–577 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasilyev, D. V., Sokolov, I. V. & Polzik, E. S. Quantum memory for images: A quantum hologram. Phys. Rev. A 77, 020302(R) (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hau, L. V., Harris, S. E., Dutton, Z. & Behroozi, C. H. Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas. Nature 397, 594–598 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Camacho, R. M., Pack, M. V., Howell, J. C., Schweinsberg, A. & Boyd, R. W. Wide-bandwidth, tunable, multiple-pulse-width optical delays using slow light in cesium vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 153601 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyer, V., McCormick, C. F., Arimondo, E. & Lett, P. D. Ultraslow propagation of matched pulses by four-wave mixing in an atomic vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 143601 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Broadbent, C. J., Camacho, R. M., Xin, R. & Howell, J. C. Preservation of energy-time entanglement in a slow light medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133602 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chaneliere, T. et al. Storage and retrieval of single photons transmitted between remote quantum memories. Nature 438, 833–836 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisaman, M. D. et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency with tunable single-photon pulses. Nature 438, 837–841 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi, K. S., Deng, H., Laurat, J. & Kimble, H. J. Mapping photonic entanglement into and out of a quantum memory. Nature 452, 67–71 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Akamatsu, D. et al. Ultraslow propagation of squeezed vacuum pulses with electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 153602 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Honda, K. et al. Storage and retrieval of a squeezed vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093601 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Appel, J., Figueroa, E., Korystov, D., Lobino, M. & Lvovsky, A. I. Quantum memory for squeezed light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093602 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hétet, G. et al. Delay of squeezing and entanglement using electromagnetically induced transparency in a vapour cell. Opt. Express 16, 7369–7381 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan, L. M., Giedke, G., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2722–2725 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reid, M. D. Demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification. Phys. Rev. A 40, 913–923 (1989)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McCormick, C. F., Marino, A. M., Boyer, V. & Lett, P. D. Strong low-frequency quantum correlations from a four-wave-mixing amplifier. Phys. Rev. A 78, 043816 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boyer, V., Marino, A. M., Pooser, R. C. & Lett, P. D. Entangled images from four-wave mixing. Science 321, 544–547 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ou, Z. Y., Pereira, S. F., Kimble, H. J. & Peng, K. C. Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous-variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663–3666 (1992)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowen, W. P., Schnabel, R., Lam, P. K. & Ralph, T. C. Experimental characterization of continuous-variable entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 69, 012304 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weedbrook, C., Grosse, N. B., Symul, T., Lam, P. K. & Ralph, T. C. Quantum cloning of continuous-variable entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052313 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan, S. M. Confirming entanglement in continuous variable quantum teleportation. Phys. Rev. A 60, 2752–2758 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grosshans, F. & Grangier, P. Quantum cloning and teleportation criteria for continuous quantum variables. Phys. Rev. A 64, 010301(R) (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Boyd, R. W., Gauthier, D. J., Gaeta, A. L. & Willner, A. E. Maximum time delay achievable on propagation through a slow-light medium. Phys. Rev. A 71, 023801 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vudyasetu, P. K., Camacho, R. M. & Howell, J. C. Storage and retrieval of multimode transverse images in hot atomic rubidium vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 123903 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shuker, M., Firstenberg, O., Pugatch, R., Ron, A. & Davidson, N. Storing images in warm atomic vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 223601 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Boyer, V., Marino, A. M. & Lett, P. D. Generation of spatially broadband twin beams for quantum imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 143601 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Collins, O. A., Jenkins, S. D., Kuzmich, A. & Kennedy, T. A. B. Multiplexed memory insensitive quantum repeaters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060502 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tordrup, K., Negretti, A. & Molmer, K. Holographic quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 040501 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.C.P. is supported by the Intelligence Community Postdoctoral Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Joint Quantum Institute, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Maryland, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA ,

    A. M. Marino, R. C. Pooser, V. Boyer & P. D. Lett

  2. MUARC, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK ,

    V. Boyer

Authors
  1. A. M. Marino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. C. Pooser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Boyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. D. Lett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Marino.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Figures 1-2 with Legends and a Supplementary Reference (PDF 198 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marino, A., Pooser, R., Boyer, V. et al. Tunable delay of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen entanglement. Nature 457, 859–862 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07751

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07751

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing