Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Commentary
Nature 456, 871-872 (18 December 2008) | doi:10.1038/456871a; Published online 17 December 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Research Assistant / Associate
- University of Glasgow
- Glasgow, UK
Faculty Positions
- University of Texas Medical Branch
- Galveston, TX United States
Three rules for technological fixes
Daniel Sarewitz1 & Richard Nelson2
- Daniel Sarewitz is co-director of the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, and Professor of Science and Society, at Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA.
Email: daniel.sarewitz@asu.edu - Richard Nelson is George Blumenthal Professor of International and Public Affairs Emeritus at Columbia University, New York 10027, USA, and visiting professor at the University of Manchester Business School.
Email: rrn2@columbia.edu
Abstract
Not all problems will yield to technology. Deciding which will and which won't should be central to setting innovation policy, say Daniel Sarewitz and Richard Nelson.
For some social problems, scientific research and technological innovation deliver significant progress, whereas for others, such activities lead to little if any improvement. Remarkable advances have been made in disease reduction through vaccination efforts, for example.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
