Letter

Nature 453, 1216-1219 (26 June 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature07070; Received 5 December 2007; Accepted 23 April 2008

Mega-impact formation of the Mars hemispheric dichotomy

Margarita M. Marinova1, Oded Aharonson1 & Erik Asphaug2

  1. California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, MC 150-21, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  2. Earth Sciences Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA

Correspondence to: Margarita M. Marinova1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.M.M. (Email: mmm@caltech.edu).

The Mars hemispheric dichotomy is expressed as a dramatic difference in elevation, crustal thickness and crater density between the southern highlands and northern lowlands (which cover approx42% of the surface)1, 2. Despite the prominence of the dichotomy, its origin has remained enigmatic and models for its formation largely untested3, 4, 5. Endogenic degree-1 convection models with north–south asymmetry are incomplete in that they are restricted to simulating only mantle dynamics and they neglect crustal evolution, whereas exogenic multiple impact events are statistically unlikely to concentrate in one hemisphere6. A single mega-impact of the requisite size has not previously been modelled. However, it has been hypothesized that such an event could obliterate the evidence of its occurrence by completely covering the surface with melt7 or catastrophically disrupting the planet3, 8. Here we present a set of single-impact initial conditions by which a large impactor can produce features consistent with the observed dichotomy's crustal structure and persistence. Using three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations, large variations are predicted in post-impact states depending on impact energy, velocity and, importantly, impact angle, with trends more pronounced or unseen in commonly studied smaller impacts9. For impact energies of approx(3–6) times 1029 J, at low impact velocities (6–10 km s-1) and oblique impact angles (30–60°), the resulting crustal removal boundary is similar in size and ellipticity to the observed characteristics of the lowlands basin. Under these conditions, the melt distribution is largely contained within the area of impact and thus does not erase the evidence of the impact's occurrence. The antiquity of the dichotomy10 is consistent with the contemporaneous presence of impactors of diameter 1,600–2,700 km in Mars-crossing orbits3, and the impact angle is consistent with the expected distribution11.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.