Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028d; Published online 5 March 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Assistant or Associate Professor of Neurobiology
- Medical College of Georgia
- Augusta, GA United States
Postdoctoral Positions
- Meharry Medical College
- Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Double-blind review: let diversity reign
Bob O'Hara1
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, PO Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
The aim of blinding in peer-review is to improve the quality of reviews by removing any bias that might arise from knowing the identity of the authors. As your Editorial 'Working double-blind' (Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer in Europe: critical evaluation of data from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry 1990?1999Bone Marrow Transplantation Original Article
Why negatives should be viewed as positivesNature Correspondence (16 Feb 2006)
European grants: a different view puts rich countries aheadNature Correspondence (18 Sep 2008)
High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodentsNature Letters to Editor (04 Jan 2007)
