Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 451, 189-192 (10 January 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature06455; Received 15 October 2007; Accepted 6 November 2007
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
nature jobs
Protein Expression / Purification Scientist - Biological Reagents and Assay Development
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Harlow, Essex - United Kingdom
Gastrointestinal Pathologist
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Boston, MA
The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation
John M. McNamara1, Zoltan Barta2, Lutz Fromhage3 & Alasdair I. Houston3
- Department of Mathematics, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TW, UK
- Department of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4010, Hungary
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
Correspondence to: Lutz Fromhage3 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.F. (Email: lutzfromhage@web.de).
Abstract
Explaining the rise and maintenance of cooperation is central to our understanding of biological systems1, 2 and human societies3, 4. When an individual's cooperativeness is used by other individuals as a choice criterion, there can be competition to be more generous than others, a situation called competitive altruism5. The evolution of cooperation between non-relatives can then be driven by a positive feedback between increasing levels of cooperativeness and choosiness6. Here we use evolutionary simulations to show that, in a situation where individuals have the opportunity to engage in repeated pairwise interactions, the equilibrium degree of cooperativeness depends critically on the amount of behavioural variation that is being maintained in the population by processes such as mutation. Because our model does not invoke complex mechanisms such as negotiation behaviour, it can be applied to a wide range of species. The results suggest an important role of lifespan in the evolution of cooperation.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Behavioural evolution Cooperate with thy neighbour?Nature News and Views (08 Apr 2004)
Evolutionary biology Help and you shall be helpedNature News and Views (11 Jun 1998)
See all 13 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift gameNature Letters to Editor (08 Apr 2004)
The coevolution of choosiness and cooperationNature Letters to Editor (10 Jan 2008)
See all 29 matches for Research
