Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Review
Nature 450, 1184-1189 (20 December 2007) | doi:10.1038/nature06393; Received 2 May 2007; Accepted 18 October 2007
After a dozen years of progress the origin of angiosperms is still a great mystery
Michael W. Frohlich1 & Mark W. Chase1
Abstract
Here we discuss recent advances surrounding the origin of angiosperms. Putatively primitive characters are now much better understood because of a vastly improved understanding of angiosperm phylogenetics, and recent discoveries of fossil flowers have provided an increasingly detailed picture of early diversity in the angiosperms. The 'anthophyte theory', the dominant concept of the 1980s and 1990s, has been eclipsed; Gnetales, previously thought to be closest to the angiosperms, are related instead to other extant gymnosperms, probably most closely to conifers. Finally, new theories of flower origins have been proposed based on gene function, duplication and loss, as well as on morphology. Further studies of genetic mechanisms that control reproductive development in seed plants provide a most promising avenue for further research, including tests of these recent theories. Identification of fossils with morphologies that convincingly place them close to angiosperms could still revolutionize understanding of angiosperm origins.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Time for the angiospermsNature News and Views (16 Dec 1993)
Botany The family tree flowersNature News and Views (25 Nov 1999)
See all 7 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Identification of diploid endosperm in an early angiosperm lineageNature Letters to Editor (31 Jan 2002)
See all 18 matches for Research