Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 450, 27 (1 November 2007) | doi:10.1038/450027b; Published online 31 October 2007
Ethics reviews can be centralized without delays
Jeffrey Abrams1 & Jacquelyn Goldberg1
- Central Institutional Review Board Initiative, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
The problems inherent in continuing the current system of local ethics reviews for multicentre trials are appropriately highlighted in your News Feature 'Trial and error' (Nature 448, 530–532; 2007). However, you state that the Central Institutional Review Board of the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) adds bureaucracy by its efforts to centralize review.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Concern at animal research should not be dismissedNature Correspondence (20 Oct 2005)
Missing the mark on biomedical researchNature Correspondence (01 Nov 2007)
The action of enhancers can lead to addictionNature Correspondence (31 Jan 2008)
System to rank scientists was pedalled by JeffreysNature Correspondence (13 Oct 2005)
See all 5 matches for Research