Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Article
Nature 449, 677-681 (11 October 2007) | doi:10.1038/nature06151; Received 26 June 2007; Accepted 8 August 2007
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
nature jobs
Senior Research Fellow - Atlantic Ocean Circulation and Climate
- University of Southampton
- Southampton / Hampshire United Kingdom
Research Group Leader
- University of Vienna
- Vienna, Austria
Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch
Chris Todd Hittinger1,2 & Sean B. Carroll1
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- Present address: Center for Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.
Correspondence to: Sean B. Carroll1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.B.C. (Email: sbcarrol@wisc.edu) and C.T.H. (Email: cthittinger@wustl.edu).
Abstract
How gene duplication and divergence contribute to genetic novelty and adaptation has been of intense interest, but experimental evidence has been limited. The genetic switch controlling the yeast galactose use pathway includes two paralogous genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encode a co-inducer (GAL3) and a galactokinase (GAL1). These paralogues arose from a single bifunctional ancestral gene as is still present in Kluyveromyces lactis. To determine which evolutionary processes shaped the evolution of the two paralogues, here we assess the effects of precise replacement of coding and non-coding sequences on organismal fitness. We suggest that duplication of the ancestral bifunctional gene allowed for the resolution of an adaptive conflict between the transcriptional regulation of the two gene functions. After duplication, previously disfavoured binding site configurations evolved that divided the regulation of the ancestral gene into two specialized genes, one of which ultimately became one of the most tightly regulated genes in the genome.
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
- Present address: Center for Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.
Correspondence to: Sean B. Carroll1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.B.C. (Email: sbcarrol@wisc.edu) and C.T.H. (Email: cthittinger@wustl.edu).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Evolutionary genetics Making the most of redundancyNature News and Views (11 Oct 2007)
Evolutionary genomics Seeing doubleNature News and Views (01 Jul 2004)
See all 3 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Gal80????Gal80 interaction on adjacent Gal4p binding sites is required for complete GAL gene repressionThe EMBO Journal Article (15 Feb 2001)
Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeastMolecular Systems Biology Article (31 Jul 2007)
See all 12 matches for Research
