Correspondence

Nature 449, 403 (27 September 2007) | doi:10.1038/449403b; Published online 26 September 2007

H-index: however ranked, citations need context

Michael C. Wendl1

  1. Washington University Medical School, 4444 Forest Park Boulevard, Box 8501, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA

Sir

The h-index (the number n of a researcher's papers that have received at least n citations) may paint a more objective picture of productivity than some metrics, as your News story 'Achievement index climbs the ranks' (Nature 448, 737; 2007) points out. But for all such metrics, context is critical.

Many citations are used simply to flesh out a paper's introduction, having no real significance to the work. Citations are also sometimes made in a negative context, or to fraudulent or retracted publications. Other confounding factors include the practice of 'gratuitous authorship' and the so-called 'Matthew effect', whereby well-established researchers and projects are cited disproportionately more often than those that are less widely known. Finally, bibliometrics do not compensate for the well-known citation bias that favours review articles.

Contributions to Correspondence may be submitted to correspondence@nature.com. They should be no longer than 300 words. Published contributions are edited. We welcome comments at Nautilus (http://blogs.nature.com/nautilus).


Sorry, post comment service is unavailable now due to some technical problem. Please try again later.