Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 448, 129 (12 July 2007) | doi:10.1038/448129c; Published online 11 July 2007
Mentors could support a student reviewer database
Angelo P. Pernetta1
- Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, FBA East Stoke, Wareham, Dorset BH20 6BB, UK
Your Editorial 'Mentors of tomorrow' (Nature 447, 754; 2007) highlights a need to encourage ethical, honest and fair peer review by young scientists. Although I applaud the ethos of the argument presented, graduate students such as myself often suffer from anonymity in their field of research, even though our work is often at the cutting edge.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Genetic segregation of microsatellite markers in Saccharum officinarum and S. spontaneumHeredity Original Article
Phylogeographic structure in an Australian freshwater shrimp largely pre-dates the geological origins of its landscapeHeredity Original Article
Reform options for peer reviewNature Correspondence (15 Jul 1993)
Peer reviewNature Correspondence (08 Jun 1989)