Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

8-oxo-guanine bypass by human DNA polymerases in the presence of auxiliary proteins

Abstract

Specialized DNA polymerases (DNA pols) are required for lesion bypass in human cells1. Auxiliary factors have an important, but so far poorly understood, role. Here we analyse the effects of human proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication protein A (RP-A) on six different human DNA pols—belonging to the B, Y and X classes—during in vitro bypass of different lesions. The mutagenic lesion 8-oxo-guanine (8-oxo-G) has high miscoding potential2,3,4. A major and specific effect was found for 8-oxo-G bypass with DNA pols λ and η. PCNA and RP-A allowed correct incorporation of dCTP opposite a 8-oxo-G template 1,200-fold more efficiently than the incorrect dATP by DNA pol λ, and 68-fold by DNA pol η, respectively. Experiments with DNA-pol-λ-null cell extracts suggested an important role for DNA pol λ. On the other hand, DNA pol ι, together with DNA pols α, δ and β, showed a much lower correct bypass efficiency. Our findings show the existence of an accurate mechanism to reduce the deleterious consequences of oxidative damage and, in addition, point to an important role for PCNA and RP-A in determining a functional hierarchy among different DNA pols in lesion bypass.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: PCNA and RP-A influence bypass of 8-oxo-G by human DNA pol λ.
Figure 2: 8-oxo-G bypass by human DNA pols η and ι with RP-A and PCNA.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hubscher, U., Maga, G. & Spadari, S. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 133–163 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins, A. R. Oxidative DNA damage, antioxidants, and cancer. Bioessays 21, 238–246 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krahn, J. M., Beard, W. A., Miller, H., Grollman, A. P. & Wilson, S. H. Structure of DNA polymerase β with the mutagenic DNA lesion 8-oxodeoxyguanine reveals structural insights into its coding potential. Structure 11, 121–127 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shibutani, S., Takeshita, M. & Grollman, A. P. Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG. Nature 349, 431–434 (1991)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Y. et al. Lesion bypass activities of human DNA polymerase μ. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 44582–44587 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maga, G., Shevelev, I., Villani, G., Spadari, S. & Hubscher, U. Human replication protein A can suppress the intrinsic in vitro mutator phenotype of human DNA polymerase λ. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 1405–1415 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maga, G. et al. Human DNA polymerase λ functionally and physically interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen in normal and translesion DNA synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48434–48440 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maga, G. et al. DNA elongation by the human DNA polymerase λ polymerase and terminal transferase activities are differentially coordinated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen and replication protein A. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1971–1981 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Haracska, L., Yu, S. L., Johnson, R. E., Prakash, L. & Prakash, S. Efficient and accurate replication in the presence of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine by DNA polymerase η. Nature Genet. 25, 458–461 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaisman, A. & Woodgate, R. Unique misinsertion specificity of pol ι may decrease the mutagenic potential of deaminated cytosines. EMBO J. 20, 6520–6529 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Maga, G., Frouin, I., Spadari, S. & Hubscher, U. Replication protein A as a “fidelity clamp” for DNA polymerase α. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18235–18242 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanca, G. et al. Human DNA polymerases λ and β show different efficiencies of translesion DNA synthesis past abasic sites and alternative mechanisms for frameshift generation. Biochemistry 43, 11605–11615 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haracska, L., Kondratick, C. M., Unk, I., Prakash, S. & Prakash, L. Interaction with PCNA is essential for yeast DNA polymerase η function. Mol. Cell 8, 407–415 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haracska, L. et al. Targeting of human DNA polymerase ι to the replication machinery via interaction with PCNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14256–14261 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffmann, J. S. et al. DNA polymerase β bypasses in vitro a single d(GpG)-cisplatin adduct placed on codon 13 of the HRAS gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5356–5360 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bassett, E. et al. Frameshifts and deletions during in vitro translesion synthesis past Pt-DNA adducts by DNA polymerases β and η. DNA Repair (Amst.) 1, 1003–1016 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiser, T. et al. Biochemical and functional comparison of DNA polymerases α, δ and ε from calf thymus. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 10420–10428 (1991)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bertocci, B., De Smet, A., Weill, J. C. & Reynaud, C. A. Nonoverlapping functions of DNA polymerases μ, λ, and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase during immunoglobulin V(D)J recombination in vivo. Immunity 25, 31–41 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Todaro, G. J. & Green, H. Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines. J. Cell Biol. 17, 299–313 (1963)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Woodgate for his generous gift of recombinant human DNA pol η and ι. U.H. and U.W. are supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, by the UBS “im Auftrag eines Kunden”, and U.H. and E.F. by the University of Zürich, which gave a grant in aid to G.M. G.M. is supported partially by the CARIPLO Foundation Project “Oncogenetica e Proteomica della Replicazione”. G.V. is supported by CNRS and ARC.

Author Contributions G.M. and U.H. had the original idea. G.M. supervised the overall experimental strategy and performed all the experiments with human DNA pol λ and cell extracts; E.C. performed all the experiments with human DNA polymerases α, δ, β, ι and η; U.W. and B.B. generated the DNA POLL+/+ and POLL-/- MEFs and characterized their phenotype; G.V. provided the damaged templates; E.F. purified DNA pols α, δ, PCNA and RP-A; G.M., G.V. and U.H. designed and interpreted all the experiments and equally contributed to manuscript writing and figures preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Maga.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S5 with Legends and Supplementary Table S1. The Supplementary Figures provide additional evidences for the specificity of the observed effects of PCNA and RP-A on DNA polymerases lambda and eta during 8-oxo-G bypass, including results with other lesions such as abasic site and cis-platinum adduct.The Supplementary Table 1 summarizes all the kinetic constants for nucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerases lambda, alpha eta and iota opposite a normal G or an 8-oxo-G. (PDF 977 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maga, G., Villani, G., Crespan, E. et al. 8-oxo-guanine bypass by human DNA polymerases in the presence of auxiliary proteins. Nature 447, 606–608 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05843

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05843

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing