Letter
Nature 446, 1082-1085 (26 April 2007) | doi:10.1038/nature05733; Received 27 November 2006; Accepted 8 March 2007
How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings
D. Lentink1, U. K. Müller1, E. J. Stamhuis2, R. de Kat3, W. van Gestel1, L. L. M. Veldhuis3, P. Henningsson4, A. Hedenström4, J. J. Videler2,5 & J. L. van Leeuwen1
- Experimental Zoology Group, Wageningen University, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Marine Biology, Groningen University, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
- Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HS Delft, The Netherlands
- Department of Theoretical Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
- Institute of Biology, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: D. Lentink1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.L. (Email: david.lentink@wur.nl).
Gliding birds continually change the shape and size of their wings1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, presumably to exploit the profound effect of wing morphology on aerodynamic performance7, 8, 9. That birds should adjust wing sweep to suit glide speed has been predicted qualitatively by analytical glide models2, 10, which extrapolated the wing's performance envelope from aerodynamic theory. Here we describe the aerodynamic and structural performance of actual swift wings, as measured in a wind tunnel, and on this basis build a semi-empirical glide model. By measuring inside and outside swifts' behavioural envelope, we show that choosing the most suitable sweep can halve sink speed or triple turning rate. Extended wings are superior for slow glides and turns; swept wings are superior for fast glides and turns. This superiority is due to better aerodynamic performance—with the exception of fast turns. Swept wings are less effective at generating lift while turning at high speeds, but can bear the extreme loads. Finally, our glide model predicts that cost-effective gliding occurs at speeds of 8–10 m s-1, whereas agility-related figures of merit peak at 15–25 m s-1. In fact, swifts spend the night ('roost') in flight at 8–10 m s-1 (ref. 11), thus our model can explain this choice for a resting behaviour11, 12. Morphing not only adjusts birds' wing performance to the task at hand, but could also control the flight of future aircraft7.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Fat and formation in flightNature News and Views (18 Oct 2001)
Animal Locomotion: Hovering FlightNature News and Views (21 Apr 1972)
See all 15 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Efficiency characteristics of crescent-shaped wings and caudal finsNature Letters to Editor (29 Jan 1987)
Efficiency characteristics of crescent-shaped wings and caudal finsNature Letters to Editor (29 Jan 1987)
Comparative power curves in bird flightNature Letters to Editor (23 Jan 2003)
See all 38 matches for Research