Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 444, 1065-1068 (21 December 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature05386; Received 26 July 2006; Accepted 23 October 2006
nature jobs
Dermapathologist
- Indiana University School of Medicine
- Indiana, USA
Senior Scientist, Cellular & Molecular Pharmacology
- Cortex Search Inc.
- Vancouver, British Columbia
Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals
T. H. Clutton-Brock1,2, S. J. Hodge1, G. Spong1,3, A. F. Russell1,4, N. R. Jordan1, N. C. Bennett2, L. L. Sharpe5 & M. B. Manser6
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
- Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Animal Ecology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, Matieland 7602, South Africa
- Zoologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
Correspondence to: T. H. Clutton-Brock1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.H.C.B. (Email: thcb@cam.ac.uk).
Abstract
In most animals, the sex that invests least in its offspring competes more intensely for access to the opposite sex and shows greater development of secondary sexual characters than the sex that invests most1, 2. However, in some mammals where females are the primary care-givers, females compete more frequently or intensely with each other than males3, 4, 5. A possible explanation is that, in these species, the resources necessary for successful female reproduction are heavily concentrated and intrasexual competition for breeding opportunities is more intense among females than among males. Intrasexual competition between females is likely to be particularly intense in cooperative breeders where a single female monopolizes reproduction in each group6. Here, we use data from a twelve-year study of wild meerkats (Suricata suricatta), where females show high levels of reproductive skew, to show that females gain greater benefits from acquiring dominant status than males and traits that increase competitive ability exert a stronger influence on their breeding success. Females that acquire dominant status also develop a suite of morphological, physiological and behavioural characteristics that help them to control other group members. Our results show that sex differences in parental investment are not the only mechanism capable of generating sex differences in reproductive competition and emphasize the extent to which competition for breeding opportunities between females can affect the evolution of sex differences and the operation of sexual selection.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Pretender punishment induced by chemical signalling in a queenless antNature Letters to Editor (05 Sep 2002)
Tug-of-war over reproduction in a social beeNature Letters to Editor (22 Apr 2004)
Helping behaviour in brown hyenasNature Letters to Editor (26 Apr 1984)
Mammalian sex ratios and variation in costs of rearing sons and daughtersNature Letters to Editor (18 Jan 1990)
See all 8 matches for Research
