Pollinators may be seeking more than just food as a reward when they choose one flower over another.
Abstract
Floral colour signals are used by pollinators as predictors of nutritional rewards, such as nectar1,2,3. But as insect pollinators often need to invest energy to maintain their body temperature4 above the ambient temperature, floral heat might also be perceived as a reward. Here we show that bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) prefer to visit warmer flowers and that they can learn to use colour to predict floral temperature before landing. In what could be a widespread floral adaptation, plants may modulate their temperature to encourage pollinators to visit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Some beetles spend extended periods (about 24 hours) inside specialized thermogenic flowers, even in the absence of a nutritional reward5, and basking insects will take advantage of floral suntraps6. Visits to flowers by pollinating insects in order to imbibe carbohydrates in nectar are typically much briefer. But it is possible that endothermic pollinators might also seek a metabolic reward in the form of heat, given that the temperature of floral nectar is the same as the flower containing it. Differences in floral temperature occur widely between and within plant species6,7,8,9 and, if these variations can influence the preference of pollinators, pollinators may forage adaptively by paying attention to temperature when choosing between flowers10.
To test whether warmer nectar is preferred by pollinators, we connected a bumblebee nest box to a flight arena where sucrose solution (20% by volume) was available from two identical feeders, one at room temperature (18.5 °C ± 0.3 s.d.) and the other at 18.5 °C, 22.5 °C, 27 °C or 29.5 °C (for details, see supplementary information). There was a significant increase in bees' preference for the warmer feeder (Pearson's R = 0.9870, P = 0.012), and this preference was significant when the temperature difference was 4 °C or more (Fig. 1a). In this case, bees were using spatial positioning to identify the warmer feeder.
To test whether bees can learn to use flower colour to identify warmer flowers, we exposed them to coloured artificial flowers (four purple 'flowers' at 28.8±0.2 °C and four pink 'flowers' at 20.8±0.1 °C), which were positioned randomly and which each presented 20 µl sucrose solution (40% by volume) (see supplementary information).
Choice frequency for bees landing on the warmer purple flowers was 58.0% (±2.6 s.d.; χ2 = 25.6, d.f. = 1, P<0.001; n = 10 bees) (Fig. 1b). This was significantly higher than the choice frequency in a control group, for which there was no temperature difference between the purple and pink flowers, and indicates that the bees did not simply prefer purple flowers (Fig. 1b; mean, 49.4%±3.0 s.d.; independent samples t-test, t = 9.54, d.f. = 18, P<0.001; n=10 bees per treatment). When the pink flowers were warmer than the purple ones, the pink colour was preferred (Fig. 1b; mean, 61.6%±3.8 s.d.; χ2 = 53.8, d.f. = 1, P<0.001; n = 10 bees).
We conclude that the bees preferred to land on the warmer flowers, even though the similarly coloured alternative contained the same nutritional reward. In another control experiment in which flowers varied in temperature but not colour, discrimination fell to chance levels (50.8%±3.1 s.d.; χ2 = 0.3, d.f. = 1; P = 0.64, NS; n = 10 bees), indicating that the bees must use colour as a cue, rather than directly gauging temperature by remote perception.
Our findings indicate that floral temperature can serve as an additional reward for pollinator insects when nutritional rewards are also available. They may also have implications for the evolution of specific floral structures and for the connection between floral sensory cues, floral temperature and pollinator behaviour9.
References
Menzel, R. & Backhaus, W. in The Perception of Colour (ed. Gouras, P.) 262–293 (Macmillan, London, 1991).
Chittka, L., Dyer, A. G., Bock, F. & Dornhaus, A. Nature 424, 388 (2003).
Giurfa, M. Naturwissenschaften 91, 228–231 (2004).
Heinrich, B. & Esch, H. Am. Sci. 82, 164–170 (1994).
Seymour, R. S., White, C. R. & Gibernau, M. Nature 426, 243–244 (2003).
Kevan, P. G. Science 189, 723–726 (1975).
Sapir, Y., Shmida, A. & Ne'eman, G. Oecologia 147, 53–59 (2006).
Miller, G. A. Oecologia 70, 155–160 (1986).
Comba, L. et al. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 639–647 (2000).
Thien, L. B., Azuma, H. & Kawano, S. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (suppl.), 225–235 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyer, A., Whitney, H., Arnold, S. et al. Bees associate warmth with floral colour. Nature 442, 525 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/442525a
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/442525a
This article is cited by
-
The role of petal transpiration in floral humidity generation
Planta (2022)
-
Phylogenetic signal in floral temperature patterns
BMC Research Notes (2021)
-
Floral infrared emissivity estimates using simple tools
Plant Methods (2021)
-
Disentangling the path of pollinator attraction in temporarily colored flowers
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science (2021)
-
Influence of Climate Change on Flowering Time
Journal of Plant Biology (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.