Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 441, 735-738 (8 June 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature04799; Received 7 October 2005; Accepted 10 April 2006
nature jobs
PhD or Postdoctoral Fellow: DFT Calculations in Materials Science
- KAUST (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)
- Saudi Arabia
Laboratory Technician (Pharmaceutical Analysis & Quality Control)
- Alliance Institute of Advanced Pharmacy and Health Sciences
- Hyderabad 500038 India
Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress
K. R. Felzer1 & E. E. Brodsky2
- US Geological Survey, 525 S. Wilson, Pasadena, California 91106, USA
- Department of Earth Science, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA
Correspondence to: K. R. Felzer1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.R.F. (Email: kfelzer@gps.caltech.edu).
Abstract
The majority of earthquakes are aftershocks1, yet aftershock physics is not well understood. Many studies suggest that static stress changes2, 3 trigger aftershocks, but recent work suggests that shaking (dynamic stresses) may also play a role4, 5. Here we measure the decay of aftershocks as a function of distance from magnitude 2–6 mainshocks in order to clarify the aftershock triggering process. We find that for short times after the mainshock, when low background seismicity rates allow for good aftershock detection, the decay is well fitted by a single inverse power law over distances of 0.2–50 km. The consistency of the trend indicates that the same triggering mechanism is working over the entire range. As static stress changes at the more distant aftershocks are negligible, this suggests that dynamic stresses may be triggering all of these aftershocks. We infer that the observed aftershock density is consistent with the probability of triggering aftershocks being nearly proportional to seismic wave amplitude. The data are not fitted well by models that combine static stress change with the evolution of frictionally locked faults3.
- US Geological Survey, 525 S. Wilson, Pasadena, California 91106, USA
- Department of Earth Science, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA
Correspondence to: K. R. Felzer1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.R.F. (Email: kfelzer@gps.caltech.edu).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Earth science A different kind of foreshockNature News and Views (24 Mar 2005)
Earthquakes A hand on the aftershock triggerNature News and Views (08 Jun 2006)
See all 13 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stressNature Letters to Editor (08 Jun 2006)
Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faultsNature Article (24 Mar 2005)
See all 57 matches for Research
