Abstract
One of the most pressing issues facing the global conservation community is how to distribute limited resources between regions identified as priorities for biodiversity conservation1,2,3. Approaches such as biodiversity hotspots4, endemic bird areas5 and ecoregions6 are used by international organizations to prioritize conservation efforts globally7. Although identifying priority regions is an important first step in solving this problem, it does not indicate how limited resources should be allocated between regions. Here we formulate how to allocate optimally conservation resources between regions identified as priorities for conservation—the ‘conservation resource allocation problem’. Stochastic dynamic programming is used to find the optimal schedule of resource allocation for small problems but is intractable for large problems owing to the “curse of dimensionality”8. We identify two easy-to-use and easy-to-interpret heuristics that closely approximate the optimal solution. We also show the importance of both correctly formulating the problem and using information on how investment returns change through time. Our conservation resource allocation approach can be applied at any spatial scale. We demonstrate the approach with an example of optimal resource allocation among five priority regions in Wallacea and Sundaland, the transition zone between Asia and Australasia.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Possingham, H. P., Andelman, S. J., Noon, B. R., Trombulak, S. & Pulliam, H. R. in Research Priorities for Conservation Biology (eds Orians, G. & Soulé, M.) 225–244 (Island Press, Washington DC, 2001)
Pimm, S. L. et al. Can we defy nature's end? Science 293, 2207–2208 (2001)
Dalton, R. Biodiversity cash aimed at hotspots. Nature 406, 818 (2000)
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000)
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. & Wege, D. C. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation (Birdlife International, Cambridge, UK, 1998)
Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. The global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 89, 199–224 (2002)
Halpern, B. S. et al. Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending. Conserv. Biol. (in the press)
Bellman, R. Dynamic Programming (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1957)
Wilson, K. A. et al. Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environ. Manag. 35, 527–543 (2005)
Orme, C. D. L. et al. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436, 1016–1019 (2005)
Balmford, A., Gaston, K. J., Rodrigues, A. S. L. & James, A. Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting. Conserv. Biol. 14, 1–9 (2000)
Moore, J., Balmford, A., Allnutt, T. & Burgess, N. Integrating costs into conservation planning across Africa. Biol. Conserv. 117, 343–350 (2004)
Frazee, S. R., Cowling, R. M., Pressey, R. L., Turpie, J. K. & Lindenberg, N. Estimating the costs of conserving a biodiversity hotspot: a case-study of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 112, 275–290 (2003)
Possingham, H. & Wilson, K. Biodiversity—turning up the heat on hotspots. Nature 436, 919–920 (2005)
Odling-Smee, L. Conservation: dollars and sense. Nature 437, 614–616 (2005)
Groves, C. et al. Designing a Geography of Hope. A Practitioner's Guide for Ecoregional Conservation Planning (The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC, 2000)
Clark, C. W. & Mangel, M. Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2000)
Meir, E., Andelman, S. & Possingham, H. P. Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecol. Lett. 7, 615–622 (2004)
Rosenzweig, M. Species Diversity in Space and Time (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995)
Brooks, T. M. et al. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 16, 909–923 (2002)
MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1967)
Achard, F. et al. Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science 297, 999–1002 (2002)
Linkie, M., Smith, R. J. & Leader-Williams, N. Mapping and predicting deforestation patterns in the lowlands of Sumatra. Biodivers. Conserv. 13, 1809–1818 (2004)
Curran, L. M. et al. Lowland forest loss in protected areas in Indonesian Borneo. Science 303, 1000–1003 (2004)
Balmford, A., Gaston, K. J., Blyth, S., James, A. & Kapos, V. Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1046–1050 (2003)
Possingham, H., Day, J., Goldfinch, M. & Salzborn, F. in Decision Sciences: Tools for Today, 12th Australian Operations Research Conference (eds Sutton, D., Cousins, E. & Pearce, C.) 536–545 (ASOR, Univ. Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 1993)
Costello, C. & Polasky, S. Dynamic reserve site selection. Res. Energy Econ. 26, 157–174 (2004)
Drechsler, M. Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection. Biol. Conserv. 122, 253–262 (2005)
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Elkin, T. Martin and E. Game for comments on the manuscript; and P. Kareiva, S. Polasky, R. L. Pressey, S. Andelman and B. Murdoch for discussions. The work was supported by The University of Queensland and grants from the Australian Research Council (to H.P.P, M. A. McCarthy and R. L. Pressey).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table
The sources of data for each priority region. (DOC 24 kb)
Supplementary Methods
This file contains the supplementary methods. (PDF 159 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, K., McBride, M., Bode, M. et al. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440, 337–340 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04366
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04366
This article is cited by
-
An updated floristic map of the world
Nature Communications (2023)
-
A multi-ecosystem prioritization framework to balance competing habitat conservation needs of multiple species in decline
Landscape Ecology (2023)
-
Quantitative Analysis of Tarsier Duet Calls from Field Surveys Reveals a New Acoustic Form in Gorontalo (Indonesia)
International Journal of Primatology (2023)
-
A new approach to define an economically important fish as an umbrella flagship species to enhance collaborative stakeholder-management agency habitat conservation
Environmental Biology of Fishes (2023)
-
Environmental drivers of seasonal shifts in abundance of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in a tropical island environment
Ecological Processes (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.