Access

Letter

Nature 439, 965-968 (23 February 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature04336; Received 9 August 2005; Accepted 19 October 2005

Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates

Frédéric Delsuc1,3, Henner Brinkmann1, Daniel Chourrout2 & Hervé Philippe1

  1. Département de Biochimie, Centre Robert-Cedergren, Université de Montréal, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec H3C3J7, Canada
  2. Sars Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, Bergen High Technology Centre, University of Bergen, Thormøhlensgaten 55, 5008 Bergen, Norway
  3. †Present address: Laboratoire de Paléontologie, Phylogénie et Paléobiologie, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, UMR 5554-CNRS, Université Montpellier II, France

Correspondence to: Hervé Philippe1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.P. (Email: herve.philippe@umontreal.ca).

Top

Tunicates or urochordates (appendicularians, salps and sea squirts), cephalochordates (lancelets) and vertebrates (including lamprey and hagfish) constitute the three extant groups of chordate animals. Traditionally, cephalochordates are considered as the closest living relatives of vertebrates, with tunicates representing the earliest chordate lineage1, 2. This view is mainly justified by overall morphological similarities and an apparently increased complexity in cephalochordates and vertebrates relative to tunicates2. Despite their critical importance for understanding the origins of vertebrates3, phylogenetic studies of chordate relationships have provided equivocal results4, 5, 6, 7. Taking advantage of the genome sequencing of the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica, we assembled a phylogenomic data set of 146 nuclear genes (33,800 unambiguously aligned amino acids) from 14 deuterostomes and 24 other slowly evolving species as an outgroup. Here we show that phylogenetic analyses of this data set provide compelling evidence that tunicates, and not cephalochordates, represent the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Chordate monophyly remains uncertain because cephalochordates, albeit with a non-significant statistical support, surprisingly grouped with echinoderms, a hypothesis that needs to be tested with additional data. This new phylogenetic scheme prompts a reappraisal of both morphological and palaeontological data and has important implications for the interpretation of developmental and genomic studies in which tunicates and cephalochordates are used as model animals.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Evolution Careful with that amphioxus

Nature News and Views (23 Feb 2006)

Developmental biology A chordate with a difference

Nature News and Views (10 May 2007)

See all 15 matches for News And Views