Access

Correspondence

Nature 439, 782 (16 February 2006) | doi:10.1038/439782a; Published online 15 February 2006

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

More science jobs
Post a job for free

Why negatives should be viewed as positives

Bob O'Hara1, Mike S. Fowler2 & Christine A. Johnson3

  1. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, PO Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b), FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
  2. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
  3. Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, 314 Aronoff Laboratory, 318 West 12th Street, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

Your News story "Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process" (Nature 439, 252; 200610.1038/439252b) reports findings of no bias against manuscripts presenting negative results.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

RESEARCH

Double-blind review: let diversity reign

Nature Correspondence (06 Mar 2008)

European grants: a different view puts rich countries ahead

Nature Correspondence (18 Sep 2008)

negative results in social science

European Political Science Research Article

Is the nitric oxide system involved in genetic hypertension in Dahl rats?

Kidney International Original Article

High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents

Nature Letters to Editor (04 Jan 2007)