Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
News
Nature 439, 520-521 (2 February 2006) | doi:10.1038/439520a; Published online 1 February 2006
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Professor of Psychosomatic Medicine (W2)
- The University Hospital Jena, Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy
- Jena Germany
Laboratory Technician (Pharmaceutics)
- Alliance Institute of Advanced Pharmacy and Health Sciences
- Hyderabad 500038 India
Special Report Should journals police scientific fraud?
Emma Marris
Abstract
Editors don't expect peer review to catch deliberate fakers. But recent scandals mean that journals are looking at other ways to detect fabricated papers. Emma Marris investigates.
The scientific community is sunk in one of its periodic bouts of angst over research fraud. After the Korean researcher Woo Suk Hwang's cloning work turned out to be spectacularly false, recent weeks have brought revelations that range from spurious Norwegians in a cancer study to doubts over RNA work in Japan (see page 514).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
