Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
News
Nature 438, 900-901 (15 December 2005) | doi:10.1038/438900a; Published online 14 December 2005
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Postdoctoral Associate in Enzyme Biochemistry
- Cornell University
- Ithaca, New York
Manager Medical Writitng
- Indegene Lifesystems Pvt. Ltd
- Bengaluru 560 071 India
Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jim Giles
Abstract
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.
UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in the supplementary information.
UPDATE 2 (28 March 2006). The results reported in this news story and their interpretation have been disputed by Encyclopaedia Britannica. Nature responded to these objections .
One of the extraordinary stories of the Internet age is that of Wikipedia, a free online encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. This radical and rapidly growing publication, which includes close to 4 million entries, is now a much-used resource.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
