Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 438, 500-503 (24 November 2005) | doi:10.1038/nature04171; Received 19 May 2005; Accepted 1 September 2005
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
nature jobs
Senior Staff Scientist
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Bethesda, Maryland
Senior Scientific Manager (In Vivo Biology)
- Syngene International
- Bangalore, Karnataka 560099 India
Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory
Edward K. Vogel1, Andrew W. McCollough1 & Maro G. Machizawa1
- Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1227, USA
Correspondence to: Edward K. Vogel1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to E.K.V. (Email: vogel@uoregon.edu).
Abstract
The capacity of visual short-term memory is highly limited, maintaining only three to four objects simultaneously1, 2. This extreme limitation necessitates efficient mechanisms to select only the most relevant objects from the immediate environment to be represented in memory and to restrict irrelevant items from consuming capacity3, 4, 5. Here we report a neurophysiological measure of this memory selection mechanism in humans that gauges an individual's efficiency at excluding irrelevant items from being stored in memory. By examining the moment-by-moment contents of visual memory6, we observe that selection efficiency varies substantially across individuals and is strongly predicted by the particular memory capacity of each person. Specifically, high capacity individuals are much more efficient at representing only the relevant items than are low capacity individuals, who inefficiently encode and maintain information about the irrelevant items present in the display. These results provide evidence that under many circumstances low capacity individuals may actually store more information in memory than high capacity individuals. Indeed, this ancillary allocation of memory capacity to irrelevant objects may be a primary source of putative differences in overall storage capacity.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
The bouncer in the brainNature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Jan 2008)
The scratchpad of the mindNature News and Views (17 Jun 1993)
RESEARCH
Evidence that bone morphogenetic protein 4 has multiple biological functions during kidney and urinary tract developmentKidney International Original Article
Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacityNature Letters to Editor (15 Apr 2004)
See all 22 matches for Research
