Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Commentary
Nature 435, 737-738 (9 June 2005) | doi:10.1038/435737a; Published online 8 June 2005
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
nature jobs
Associate Professor or Full Professor
- South Dakota State University
- Brookings, SD
Apply for PhD Program
- Shinshu University
- Ueda, Nagano 386-8567 Japan
Scientists behaving badly
Brian C. Martinson1, Melissa S. Anderson2 & Raymond de Vries3
- Brian C. Martinson is at the HealthPartners Research Foundation, 8100 34th Avenue South, PO Box 1524, Mailstop 21111R, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440-1524, USA.
- Melissa S. Anderson is at the University of Minnesota, Educational Policy and Administration, 330 Wulling Hall, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
- Raymond de Vries is at the University of Minnesota, Center for Bioethics, N504 Boynton, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Abstract
To protect the integrity of science, we must look beyond falsification, fabrication and plagiarism, to a wider range of questionable research practices, argue Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson and Raymond de Vries.
Serious misbehaviour in research is important for many reasons, not least because it damages the reputation of, and undermines public support for, science. Historically, professionals and the public have focused on headline-grabbing cases of scientific misconduct, but we believe that researchers can no longer afford to ignore a wider range of questionable behaviour that threatens the integrity of science.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
|
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated NEWS AND VIEWS |

