Letters to Nature

Nature 434, 636-640 (31 March 2005) | doi:10.1038/nature03405; Received 22 November 2004; Accepted 27 January 2005

Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations

Matthew R. Goddard1,2, H. Charles J. Godfray1 & Austin Burt1

  1. NERC Centre for Population Biology and Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK
  2. Present address: School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to: Matthew R. Goddard1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.R.G. (Email: m.goddard@auckland.ac.nz).

Why sex evolved and persists is a problem for evolutionary biology, because sex disrupts favourable gene combinations and requires an expenditure of time and energy1. Further, in organisms with unequal-sized gametes, the female transmits her genes at only half the rate of an asexual equivalent (the twofold cost of sex)2. Many modern theories that provide an explanation for the advantage of sex incorporate an idea originally proposed by Weismann more than 100 years ago: sex allows natural selection to proceed more effectively because it increases genetic variation3, 4, 5. Here we test this hypothesis, which still lacks robust empirical support, with the use of experiments on yeast populations. Capitalizing on recent advances in the molecular biology of recombination in yeast, we produced by genetic manipulation strains that differed only in their capacity for sexual reproduction. We show that, as predicted by the theory, sex increases the rate of adaptation to a new harsh environment but has no measurable effect on fitness in a new benign environment where there is little selection.


These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.


Evolutionary biology Why sex is good

Nature News and Views (31 Mar 2005)

A champion thallus

Nature News and Views (02 Apr 1992)