Letters to Nature
Nature 434, 192-194 (10 March 2005) | doi:10.1038/nature03293; Received 5 October 2004; Accepted 9 December 2004
An upper limit to the masses of stars
Donald F. Figer1
- STScI, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
Correspondence to: Donald F. Figer1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to the author (Email: figer@stsci.edu).
There is no accepted upper mass limit for stars. Such a basic quantity eludes both theory and observation, because of an imperfect understanding of the star-formation process and because of incompleteness in surveying the Galaxy1. The Arches cluster2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 is ideal for investigating such limits, being large enough to expect stars at least as massive as
500 solar masses (
500 M
; based on a typical mass function), and young enough for its most massive members to still be visible. It is also old enough to be free of its natal molecular cloud, it is at a well-established distance, and it is close enough for us to discern its individual stars2. Here I report an absence of stars with initial masses greater than 130 M
in the Arches cluster, whereas the typical mass function predicts 18. I conclude that this indicates a firm limit of 150 M
for stars; the probability that the observations are consistent with there being no upper limit is 10-8.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Astronomy Stellar mass limitedNature News and Views (10 Mar 2005)
Stirrings of the Galactic heartNature News and Views (03 Oct 1996)
See all 10 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Long γ-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae have different environmentsNature Article (25 May 2006)
An extraordinary cluster of massive stars near the centre of the Milky WayNature Letters to Editor (30 Jul 1998)
See all 60 matches for Research