Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 432, 1014-1017 (23 December 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature03174; Received 26 May 2004; Accepted 21 October 2004
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Fast Growth of Transformed Soybean Shoots
A method for accelerating growth of soybean shoots is desired.
-
Protect Enzyme from In Planta Degradation
A proposal for stable expression of an enzyme in corn seed is desired.
nature jobs
Tenure Track Faculty Position
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Pathology
- Worchester, MA
Assistant Editor - Nature Methods
- Nature Publishing Group
- New York, NY
The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing
Andrew S. Ackerman1, Michael P. Kirkpatrick2, David E. Stevens3 & Owen B. Toon4
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, USA
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94552, USA
- University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Correspondence to: Andrew S. Ackerman1 Email: andrew.ackerman@nasa.gov
Abstract
Some of the global warming from anthropogenic greenhouse gases is offset by increased reflection of solar radiation by clouds with smaller droplets that form in air polluted with aerosol particles that serve as cloud condensation nuclei1. The resulting cooling tendency, termed the indirect aerosol forcing, is thought to be comparable in magnitude to the forcing by anthropogenic CO2, but it is difficult to estimate because the physical processes that determine global aerosol and cloud populations are poorly understood2. Smaller cloud droplets not only reflect sunlight more effectively, but also inhibit precipitation, which is expected to result in increased cloud water3, 4. Such an increase in cloud water would result in even more reflective clouds, further increasing the indirect forcing. Marine boundary-layer clouds polluted by aerosol particles, however, are not generally observed to hold more water5, 6, 7. Here we simulate stratocumulus clouds with a fluid dynamics model that includes detailed treatments of cloud microphysics and radiative transfer. Our simulations show that the response of cloud water to suppression of precipitation from increased droplet concentrations is determined by a competition between moistening from decreased surface precipitation and drying from increased entrainment of overlying air. Only when the overlying air is humid or droplet concentrations are very low does sufficient precipitation reach the surface to allow cloud water to increase with droplet concentrations. Otherwise, the response of cloud water to aerosol-induced suppression of precipitation is dominated by enhanced entrainment of overlying dry air. In this scenario, cloud water is reduced as droplet concentrations increase, which diminishes the indirect climate forcing.
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035, USA
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94552, USA
- University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Correspondence to: Andrew S. Ackerman1 Email: andrew.ackerman@nasa.gov
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Breaking up is hard to doNature News and Views (17 Jun 1993)
Climate change The cloud conundrumNature News and Views (23 Dec 2004)
See all 3 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Effect of precipitation on the albedo susceptibility of clouds in the marine boundary layerNature Letters to Editor (17 Nov 1994)
A climatologically significant aerosol longwave indirect effect in the ArcticNature Letters to Editor (26 Jan 2006)
See all 12 matches for Research
