Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A role for the immunological synapse in lineage commitment of CD4 lymphocytes

Abstract

Activation of the naive T-helper lymphocyte (Thp) directs it down one of two major developmental pathways called Th1 and Th2. Signals transmitted by T cell, co-stimulatory and cytokine receptors control Thp lineage commitment but the mechanism by which these signals are integrated remains a mystery. The interferon-γ (IFNGR) and interleukin 4 (IL-4R) cytokine receptors, in particular, direct the earliest stages of T-helper commitment. Here we report that on engagement of the T-cell receptor (TCR) on Thp cells, rapid co-polarization of IFNGR with the TCR occurs within the developing immunological synapse. Thp cells from the intrinsically Th1-like C57BL/6 mouse strain have significantly more receptor co-polarization than Th2-prone BALB/c Thp cells. Remarkably, in the presence of IL-4, a cytokine required for Th2 differentiation, IFNGR co-polarization with TCR is prevented. This inhibition depends on Stat6, the transcription factor downstream of IL-4R that is required for Th2 differentiation. This cytokine receptor crossregulation provides an explanation for the effect of IL-4 in inhibiting Th1 differentiation. These observations suggest a scenario in which physical co-polarization of critical receptors directs the fate of the naive Thp, and offer a novel function for the immunological synapse in directing cell differentiation. They further suggest a new mechanism of membrane-bound signalling control by the physical disruption of large receptor-rich domains on signalling through a functionally antagonistic receptor.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: TCRβ and IFNGR colocalize at the immunological synapse.
Figure 2: IFNGR co-polarization and partial IL-2R co-polarization with the TCR after T cell activation.
Figure 3: B6 Thp display increased co-polarization of TCR and IFNGR compared to BALB/c Thp.
Figure 4: IL-4 impedes the co-polarization of IFNGR with TCR in a Stat6-dependent manner.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huppa, J. B. & Davis, M. M. T-cell-antigen recognition and the immunological synapse. Nature Rev. Immunol. 3, 973–983 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Grakoui, A. et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285, 221–227 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bromley, S. K. et al. The immunological synapse. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19, 375–396 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Viola, A., Schroeder, S., Sakakibara, Y. & Lanzavecchia, A. T lymphocyte costimulation mediated by reorganization of membrane microdomains. Science 283, 680–682 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Balamuth, F., Leitenberg, D., Unternaehrer, J., Mellman, I. & Bottomly, K. Distinct patterns of membrane microdomain partitioning in Th1 and Th2 cells. Immunity 15, 729–738 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Madrenas, J. A SLAT in the Th2 signalosome. Immunity 18, 459–461 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Szabo, S. J., Sullivan, B. M., Peng, S. L. & Glimcher, L. H. Molecular mechanisms regulating Th1 immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 713–758 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. O'Garra, A. Cytokines induce the development of functionally heterogeneous T helper cell subsets. Immunity 8, 275–283 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy, K. M. & Reiner, S. L. The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2, 933–944 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, M. J., Wei, S. H., Parker, I. & Cahalan, M. D. Two-photon imaging of lymphocyte motility and antigen response in intact lymph node. Science 296, 1869–1873 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vereb, G. et al. Cholesterol-dependent clustering of IL-2Ralpha and its colocalization with HLA and CD48 on T lymphoma cells suggest their functional association with lipid rafts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6013–6018 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, J., Cote-Sierra, J., Guo, L. & Paul, W. E. Stat5 activation plays a critical role in Th2 differentiation. Immunity 19, 739–748 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takaoka, A. et al. Cross talk between interferon-gamma and -alpha/beta signaling components in caveolar membrane domains. Science 288, 2357–2360 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fowell, D. J. & Locksley, R. M. Leishmania major infection of inbred mice: unmasking genetic determinants of infectious diseases. Bioessays 21, 510–518 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Watzl, C. & Long, E. O. Natural killer cell inhibitory receptors block actin cytoskeleton-dependent recruitment of 2B4 (CD244) to lipid rafts. J. Exp. Med. 197, 77–85 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, C. H. et al. Transforming growth factor beta blocks Tec kinase phosphorylation, Ca2+ influx, and NFATc translocation causing inhibition of T cell differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 197, 1689–1699 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, K. H. et al. T cell receptor signaling precedes immunological synapse formation. Science 295, 1539–1542 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huppa, J. B., Gleimer, M., Sumen, C. & Davis, M. M. Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential. Nature Immunol. 4, 749–755 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, K. H. et al. The immunological synapse balances T cell receptor signaling and degradation. Science 302, 1218–1222 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poo, W. J., Conrad, L. & Janeway, C. A. Receptor-directed focusing of lymphokine release by helper T cells. Nature 332, 378–380 (1988)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Trambas, C. M. & Griffiths, G. M. Delivering the kiss of death. Nature Immunol. 4, 399–403 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reichert, P., Reinhardt, R. L., Ingulli, E. & Jenkins, M. K. Cutting edge: in vivo identification of TCR redistribution and polarized IL-2 production by naive CD4 T cells. J. Immunol. 166, 4278–4281 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Granucci, F. et al. Inducible IL-2 production by dendritic cells revealed by global gene expression analysis. Nature Immunol. 2, 882–888 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Welte, T. et al. STAT5 interaction with the T cell receptor complex and stimulation of T cell proliferation. Science 283, 222–225 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gamero, A. M. & Larner, A. C. Signaling via the T cell antigen receptor induces phosphorylation of Stat1 on serine 727. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16574–16578 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu, J. et al. Transient inhibition of interleukin 4 signaling by T cell receptor ligation. J. Exp. Med. 192, 1125–1134 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Y. et al. Interferon gamma stabilizes the T helper cell type 1 phenotype. J. Exp. Med. 194, 165–172 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Launois, P. et al. IL-4 rapidly produced by Vβ4 Vα8 CD4+ T cells instructs Th2 development and susceptibility to Leishmania major in BALB/c mice. Immunity 6, 541–549 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Manes, S. et al. Membrane raft microdomains in chemokine receptor function. Semin. Immunol. 13, 147–157 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsui-Pierchala, B. A., Encinas, M., Milbrandt, J. & Johnson, E. M. Jr Lipid rafts in neuronal signaling and function. Trends Neurosci. 25, 412–417 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Shaw, G. Petsko, M. Grusby and G. Lord for thoughtful review of the manuscript, and G. Petsko for advice on the statistical analysis. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants. R.M. is a recipient of the Kelli and Gerald Ford Irvington Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurie H. Glimcher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

TCRß and IFNGR colocalize at the IS. (PDF 359 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Neither IFNγ or Stat1 are required for IFNGR/TCR copolarization. (PDF 1103 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3

Neither the presence of IL-4 nor absence of IFNγ induce IL-4R and TCR copolarization after Thp activation. (PDF 859 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4

The polarization of IFNGR and TCR is not increased in IL-4-deficient BALB/c Thp. (PDF 471 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Dynamics of Thp and DC coculture. (MP4 790 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

4D observation of the dynamics of Thp activation and receptor motility in the presence of OVA protein/peptide-loaded DC. (MOV 2296 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maldonado, R., Irvine, D., Schreiber, R. et al. A role for the immunological synapse in lineage commitment of CD4 lymphocytes. Nature 431, 527–532 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02916

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02916

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing