Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letters to Nature
Nature 430, 768-772 (12 August 2004) | doi:10.1038/nature02771; Received 29 March 2004; Accepted 16 June 2004
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
nature jobs
Assistant / Associate / Full Professor
- Northeastern University
- Boston, MA
Project Director, Nouabalé-Ndoki Park Project
- Wildlife Conservation Society
- Congo Republic
Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations
James M. Murphy1, David M. H. Sexton1, David N. Barnett1, Gareth S. Jones1, Mark J. Webb1, Matthew Collins1 & David A. Stainforth2
- Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK
Correspondence to: James M. Murphy1 Email: james.murphy@metoffice.com
Abstract
Comprehensive global climate models1 are the only tools that account for the complex set of processes which will determine future climate change at both a global and regional level. Planners are typically faced with a wide range of predicted changes from different models of unknown relative quality2, 3, owing to large but unquantified uncertainties in the modelling process4. Here we report a systematic attempt to determine the range of climate changes consistent with these uncertainties, based on a 53-member ensemble of model versions constructed by varying model parameters. We estimate a probability density function for the sensitivity of climate to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, and obtain a 5–95 per cent probability range of 2.4–5.4 °C. Our probability density function is constrained by objective estimates of the relative reliability of different model versions, the choice of model parameters that are varied and their uncertainty ranges, specified on the basis of expert advice. Our ensemble produces a range of regional changes much wider than indicated by traditional methods based on scaling the response patterns of an individual simulation5, 6.
- Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK
Correspondence to: James M. Murphy1 Email: james.murphy@metoffice.com
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Climate change Models change their tuneNature News and Views (12 Aug 2004)
Lessons from past climatesNature News and Views (10 Dec 1992)
See all 3 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gasesNature Letters to Editor (27 Jan 2005)
See all 57 matches for Research
