Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Cognitive neuroscience

Practice doesn't make perfect

Nature volume 423, pages 696–697 (2003)Cite this article

It may seem counterintuitive, but we are not very efficient at recognizing even the most common words. This finding suggests strict limits on how flexible we are in learning to recognize new patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Why are we so inefficient at recognizing words?

References

  1. Pelli, D. G., Farell, B. & Moore, D. C. Nature 423, 752–756 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Green, D. M. & Swets, J. A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barlow, H. B. Vision Res. 18, 637–650 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess, A. E., Wagner, R. F., Jennings, R. J. & Barlow, H. B. Science 214, 93–94 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Geisler, W. S. Psychol. Rev. 96, 267–314 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geisler, W. S. & Kersten, D. Nature Neurosci. 5, 508–510 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peterson, W. W., Birdsall, T. G. & Fox, W. C. Trans. Inst. Radio Engineers Prof. Group Information Theory 4, 171–212 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gold, J. M., Murray, R. F., Bennett, P. J. & Sekuler, A. B. Curr. Biol. 10, 663–666 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Perceptual Systems and the Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, 78712, Texas, USA

    Wilson Geisler & Richard Murray

Authors
  1. Wilson Geisler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Murray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilson Geisler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geisler, W., Murray, R. Practice doesn't make perfect. Nature 423, 696–697 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/423696a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/423696a

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing