Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Interpretation of tomography and spectroscopy as dual forms of quantum computation

Abstract

It is important to be able to determine the state of a quantum system and to measure properties of its evolution. State determination can be achieved using tomography1, in which the system is subjected to a series of experiments, whereas spectroscopy can be used to probe the energy spectrum associated with the system's evolution. Here we show that, for a quantum system whose state or evolution can be modelled on a quantum computer, tomography and spectroscopy can be interpreted as dual forms of quantum computation2. Specifically, we find that the phase estimation algorithm3 (which underlies a quantum computer's ability to perform efficient simulations4 and to factorize large numbers5) can be adapted for tomography or spectroscopy. This is analogous to the situation encountered in scattering experiments, in which it is possible to obtain information about both the state of the scatterer and its interactions. We provide an experimental demonstration of the tomographic application by performing a measurement of the Wigner function (a phase space distribution) of a quantum system. For this purpose, we use three qubits formed from spin-1/2 nuclei in a quantum computation involving liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The scattering circuit.
Figure 2: Circuit for evaluating the spectral density of a hamiltonian h modulated by the energy populations of the state ρ.
Figure 3: Measured Wigner functions for the four computational states of a two-qubit system.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smithey, D. T., Beck, M., Reymer, M. G. & Farydani, A. Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1244–1247 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen, M. & Chuang, I. Quantum Information and Computation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitaev, A. Yu. Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem. Preprint quant-ph/9511026 at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov〉 (1995).

  4. Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073–1078 (1996)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shor, P. W. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J. Comput. Sci. 26, 1484–1509 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cleve, R., Ekert, A., Macchiavello, C. & Mosca, M. Quantum algorithms revisited. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454, 339–354 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Barenco, A. et al. Elementary gates for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457–3467 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feynman, R. P. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467–488 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Abraham, D. & Lloyd, S. Quantum algorithm providing exponential speed increase for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5162–5165 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Knill, E. & Laflamme, R. Power of one bit of quantum information. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5672–5675 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillery, M., O'Connell, R. F., Scully, M. O. & Wigner, E. P. Distribution functions in physics: fundamentals. Phys. Rep. 106, 121–167 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Paz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. in Coherent Matter Waves, Les Houches Session LXXII (eds Kaiser, R., Westbrook, C. & David, F.) 533–614 (EDP Sciences, Springer, Berlin, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wootters, W. K. A Wigner function formulation for finite state quantum mechanics. Ann. Phys. NY 176, 1–21 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leonhardt, U. Discrete Wigner function and quantum-state tomography. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2998–3013 (1996)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miquel, C., Paz, J. P. & Saraceno, M. Quantum computers in phase space. Phys. Rev. A (in the press); preprint quant-ph/0204149 at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov〉 (2002)

  16. Miquel, C., Paz, J. P. & Perazzo, R. Factoring in a dissipative quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A 54, 2605–2613 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zurek, W. H. Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence. Nature 412, 712–717 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cory, D. G. et al. Experimental quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2152–2155 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Knill, E., Chuang, I. & Laflamme, R. Effective pure states for bulk quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 57, 3348–3363 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lutterbach, L. G. & Davidovich, L. Method for direct measurement of the Wigner function in cavity QED and ion traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2547–2550 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lvovsky, L. et al. Quantum state reconstruction of the single-photon Fock state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 402–405 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nogues, G. et al. Measurement of a negative value for the Wigner function of radiation. Phys. Rev. A 62, 4101–4104 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by UBACYT, ANPCYT, Fundación Autorchas (J.P.P., C.M. and M.S.) and NSA (E.K., R.L. and C.N.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Pablo Paz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miquel, C., Paz, J., Saraceno, M. et al. Interpretation of tomography and spectroscopy as dual forms of quantum computation. Nature 418, 59–62 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00801

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00801

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing